Cho wanted to suspend B-Roy, was ruled out by Allen and McMillan

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

james3921

Member
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
101
Likes
3
Points
18
Canzano was talking yesterday about how Cho was pushing for a suspension on B-roy after his game 2 comments, and was overruled by Allen and McMillan.

Now says Portland is making Cho do as many interviews as he can.

hmmmmmmmm.....
 
yes. hm.

not sure what I'm hming about though.
 
Canzano was talking yesterday about how Cho was pushing for a suspension on B-roy after his game 2 comments, and was overruled by Allen and McMillan.

Now says Portland is making Cho do as many interviews as he can.

hmmmmmmmm.....


What are we hmmmmmming about?

Is he interviewing with other teams, or the local media, and if it's the local media, why are you hmmmming.

But I like Cho more after hearing that he wanted to suspend him after those comments, and like PA and Nate (if that's even possible) less after hearing it
 
And we have what to backup Canzano's ramblings about the Roy suspension rumor?
 
What does this even mean?

From his Twitter:

"Blazers trying to book GM Rich Cho for a lineup of local interviews. Are you interested in what he has to say?"

"Cho did not return calls or messages seeking comment. Blazers putting him on Courtside next Monday night."

"Blazers source: GM Rich Cho pushed for Roy suspension after Game 2 comments. He was met with resistance from McMillan and owner Paul Allen."
 
And we have what to backup Canzano's ramblings about the Roy suspension rumor?

e_blazer, again, a rare voice of reason, even Canzano's own tweet simply implies that the idea was floated and nixed. Fortunately!
 
Twitters are so informative.
 
Don't blame twitter, Canzano is a tool.
 
If true, good for Nate and PA.

Cho wasn't here during the dark days and didn't watch as Roy became the face of the franchise this city needed in the worst way. This face of the franchise has been an upstanding citizen and should be given a lot of credit for turning around the image of the Blazers.

With everything he has gone through in his career and this year, Roy venting in the playoffs should be cut some slack. Glad the people who has been around to see all this weighed in (if that is the way it went down).
 
"Cho did not return calls or messages seeking comment. Blazers putting him on Courtside next Monday night."

Translation: He din't return my calls, therefore, I'm going to trash his ass using my usual method...

"Blazers source: GM Rich Cho pushed for Roy suspension after Game 2 comments. He was met with resistance from McMillan and owner Paul Allen."

The unnamed source. I have made a career making up shit and always attributing it to "an unnamed source". You think by now people would start holding me accountable. I guess you really can fool most of the people most of the time. Even if my unfounded speculation ends up being partially rue, with no real source to quote, I can spin it any way I want. Life is good.

BNM
 
If true, good for Nate and PA.

Cho wasn't here during the dark days and didn't watch as Roy became the face of the franchise this city needed in the worst way. This face of the franchise has been an upstanding citizen and should be given a lot of credit for turning around the image of the Blazers.

With everything he has gone through in his career and this year, Roy venting in the playoffs should be cut some slack. Glad the people who has been around to see all this weighed in (if that is the way it went down).

I don't know that I think Roy deserves to get suspended, but if a player (who hadn't been a regular problem child) should have been, then Roy should have been.

It doesn't matter to me that he was there during the "dark days"... very few of the players are left from that team, and they shouldn't have to put up with things that are suspension-inducing merely because he used to play for the team when it was really bad.

The rumor, though, doesn't really matter to me one way or the other unless it is part of a pattern that has yet to be revealed... and I'm not going to make that leap just yet.

Ed O.
 
I have an unnamed source who claims that John Canzano and Jason Quick are secretly dating.
 
What are we hmmmmmming about?

Is he interviewing with other teams, or the local media, and if it's the local media, why are you hmmmming.

But I like Cho more after hearing that he wanted to suspend him after those comments, and like PA and Nate (if that's even possible) less after hearing it

Ditto. It sounds to me like Cho has a sense of accountability that he'd like to instill in the team, whereas Allen and Nate seem to be reinforcing a sense of entitlement.

At the very least Roy should have been fined (maybe he was and I don't remember?)
 
Ditto. It sounds to me like Cho has a sense of accountability that he'd like to instill in the team, whereas Allen and Nate seem to be reinforcing a sense of entitlement.

At the very least Roy should have been fined (maybe he was and I don't remember?)

Maybe it was a double secret fine like the Darius Miles (secretly rescinded fine).
 
I have an unnamed source who claims that John Canzano and Jason Quick are secretly dating.

Well, sounds like they deserve each other.

At least I don't have to feel sorry for a nice person dating a jerk!
 
Let's see: teamates didn't seemed bothered by Roy's comments. Coach didn't seem bothered by Roy's comments. RG fans didn't seemed bothered by Roy's comments.

I suppose Cho could suspended Roy (probably polorize magmt and players), and Blazers likely get swept. Instead, Blazers take no action, Roy plays, helps Blazers win game 3, wins game 4 in one of the largest and most dramatic Blazer playoff comebacks. Fans have a lifetime memory and teammates embrace Roy in a moment they all know how much he needed and deserved that. I would say good call not punishing him.
 
Last edited:
We should make an S2 Twitter account that looks like it is associated to Canzano and just tweet away random ass bullshit as if it was from him. Wouldn't be much of a stretch if you ask this gangster!
 
We should make an S2 Twitter account that looks like it is associated to Canzano and just tweet away random ass bullshit as if it was from him. Wouldn't be much of a stretch if you ask this gangster!

Someone did a fake Canzano twitter account a few years back and he went bat shit crazy over it. That guy was really funny who did it too.
 
Somebody do it!!!

Seriously Canzano was a little bitch about things, threatened to sue, had his lawyer on his radio show. Finally got twitter to ban the account.
 
If true, good for Nate and PA.

Cho wasn't here during the dark days and didn't watch as Roy became the face of the franchise this city needed in the worst way. This face of the franchise has been an upstanding citizen and should be given a lot of credit for turning around the image of the Blazers.

With everything he has gone through in his career and this year, Roy venting in the playoffs should be cut some slack. Glad the people who has been around to see all this weighed in (if that is the way it went down).

If it is true about Cho wanting to suspend Roy, then I lose some respect for Cho. Roy was upset that his team lost, and that he didn't play. If he had said those things after a win, sure, suspend him. But, Brandon just wanted to help his team win, which he did in Games 3 and 4.
 
I doubt Cho advocated a suspension. A fine, or at least a reprimand, possibly.

OTOH, if Nate didn't sit him down and tell him he was out-of-line, I have lost some respect for Nate.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top