TowelBoy
Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 300
- Likes
- 7
- Points
- 18
I'm arbitrarily making these numbers up, but I'm going to try to make them both very appealing--just in different ways--so I'm not stacking the deck or making it a leading question. I think the give-and-take between the options is pretty realistic. I start with 2012-2013 Batum as a baseline.
2012-2013 Batum:
14.3 PPG - 5.6 RPG - 4.9 APG - 2.9 FTA/gm - 2.3 3PM/gm - B defense
Batum A:
18.0 PPG - 5.0 RPG - 4.0 APG - 4.0 FTA/gm - 2.3 3PM/gm - B defense
Batum B:
14.0 PPG - 5.5 RPG - 5.5 APG - 2.5 FTA/gm - 3.0 3PM/gm - A defense
I'll just assume blocks and steals both stay in the low 1s either way.
Batum A would probably get more All-Star buzz. His 18.0 PPG puts him in a completely different tier, and his 4.0 FTA/gm would be a big career high showing more aggressiveness attacking the basket. 2.3 treys is the same as 2012-2013.
Batum B takes a small step backward in scoring and aggressiveness, and "settles" for staying out on the perimeter more as a 3-point specialist on offense. I hypothesize he could elevate his perimeter defense slightly in this scenario.
2012-2013 Batum:
14.3 PPG - 5.6 RPG - 4.9 APG - 2.9 FTA/gm - 2.3 3PM/gm - B defense
Batum A:
18.0 PPG - 5.0 RPG - 4.0 APG - 4.0 FTA/gm - 2.3 3PM/gm - B defense
Batum B:
14.0 PPG - 5.5 RPG - 5.5 APG - 2.5 FTA/gm - 3.0 3PM/gm - A defense
I'll just assume blocks and steals both stay in the low 1s either way.
Batum A would probably get more All-Star buzz. His 18.0 PPG puts him in a completely different tier, and his 4.0 FTA/gm would be a big career high showing more aggressiveness attacking the basket. 2.3 treys is the same as 2012-2013.
Batum B takes a small step backward in scoring and aggressiveness, and "settles" for staying out on the perimeter more as a 3-point specialist on offense. I hypothesize he could elevate his perimeter defense slightly in this scenario.


