theprunetang
Shaedon "Deadly Nightshade" Sharpe is HIM
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2008
- Messages
- 11,731
- Likes
- 21,456
- Points
- 113
Holy shit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds like Borat is in pretty big trouble. Would you say that crime is more, or less serious, than, say, acting as a foreign agent while employed as National Security Advisor?
barfo
So, behead or hang Trump then? Tough choice.While it's certain that's exactly what Susan Rice did, she has not yet been tried and convicted.
As for the legal severity scale for various crimes against America I guess you'd have to googoo it.
I regard all acts of treason pretty much the same.
While it's certain that's exactly what Susan Rice did, she has not yet been tried and convicted.
As for the legal severity scale for various crimes against America I guess you'd have to googoo it.
I regard all acts of treason pretty much the same.
Yeah sure, Democrats are gonna get killed this November. I've got you marked down for that claim.I agree that he lied repeatedly, but subpoenaed Congressional testimony under oath is not something you can take back.
Peter Strzok can run, but he can no longer hide.
More importantly, Democratic swamp continues to obliviously seal their own fate by publicly defending exposed traitors to America.
November will see Dems losing more seats, and what tiny hope they had to re-design the party's anti-American image in time for 2020 will be gone.
You know, she's gonna be indicted any day now.While it's certain that's exactly what Susan Rice did, she has not yet been tried and convicted.
As for the legal severity scale for various crimes against America I guess you'd have to googoo it.
I regard all acts of treason pretty much the same.
It's funny how people can claim "FAKE NEWS" whilst simultaneously disseminating anything from this source...
Fox News is extremely unreliable.
How is an interview with a public figure unreliable? Did they dub in someone else's voice. You guys are hilarious.
It doesn't matter if HE is the lyingist liar that ever lied.Bob Goodlatte is unreliable.
Also, he missed his calling. Should have been a barista.
barfo
It doesn't matter if HE is the lyingist liar that ever lied.
I don't waste my time with Fox not because they are rarely right but because they are so often full of shit.How is an interview with a public figure unreliable? Did they dub in someone else's voice. You guys are hilarious.
I don’t watch any major news outlets cause I thought they were all full of crap. Here’s the thing though and I’m just as guilty, just because I strongly disagree with someone doesn’t invalidate everything they say or do.I don't waste my time with Fox not because they are rarely right but because they are so often full of shit.
Political debates include a man's character.I don’t watch any major news outlets cause I thought they were all full of crap. Here’s the thing though and I’m just as guilty, just because I strongly disagree with someone doesn’t invalidate everything they say or do.
Not pointed at you, but I think we have a strong problem here of ad hominem towards news outlets, and just people in general, we don’t like I really dislike Trump but I think the biggest thing he has going for him is that the media spent the entire campaign attacking him rather than his politics. I don’t remember a single real debate on policies in 2016...
Of course they do, but they also include a slew of other things that they never got to because Hillary and Trump were too busy telling us how big of a pile of crap they thought they other one was / is...Political debates include a man's character.
Good thing he's the only one. So, going forward Fox News is fine as long as Goodcoffee ain't on there.Perhaps not to your point to dviss. But it does matter that he's a liar, in the real world.
barfo
I 100% wholeheartedly disagree, and not only because a large portion of American citizens dearly hold values I find abhorrent (and probably vice-versa). Political debates include debates on the politics. See: Romney vs. Obama, 2012. See Perot vs. Bush vs. Clinton. Hell, see Quayle/Gore/Stockdale. I'm having a hard time thinking of a politician in my lifetime who holds a candle to Stockdale's character and values, but that wasn't the point of the debates.Political debates include a man's character.
Good thing he's the only one. So, going forward Fox News is fine as long as Goodcoffee ain't on there.
Sarcasm isn't something....ah, nevermindThat logic leaves a little something to be desired.
barfo
Sarcasm isn't something....ah, nevermind
How is an interview with a public figure unreliable? Did they dub in someone else's voice. You guys are hilarious.
A lot more than often. I'd say he lies virtually all the time.Well if the guy is portraying things inaccurately then I would say it's unreliable. It's why Trump is an unreliable source. He lies often.
Political debates include a man's character.
A lot more than often. I'd say he lies virtually all the time.
The qualities that we consider makes up a mans character can and do differ greatly. Then the weight we assign to these qualities may differ even more.
Then the filters we use in making these judgements are not close to the same. Where you see virtual liar, I am amazed at your obstinance.
It's funny how people can claim "FAKE NEWS" whilst simultaneously disseminating anything from this source...