I just find it odd that out of this entire thread you chose to call out Bones for a post he made 3 years ago when you're one of the people that accuses him of starting issues in threads. You can't see some hypocrisy there?
You seem to have an issue with it....just like I did....if calling my response hypocrisy makes sense to you...it's all good. I try not to escalate these things...just call them as I see them. It's interesting that you view me as "one of the people that has had issues with the snark" ...in my view that's very selective of you although I know you are friends...good to have your friend's back hoopsjock….I don't think I've ever read a lot of snark in your posts...I enjoy them. Kingspeed is a friend of mine or I like to think so.....I got his back just the same...Eric and I took the bulk of the Homer bashing around here for years. riverman is a fan
Your post is a fucking prick. Is your posts penis that small that it needs to bump an old thread to laugh at people?Hahahaha
To me it is. I have no say though
Yes he's so small my girlfriend needs 5 Minutes to find him
adds to the foreplay!
that would require age group tags...….to be fair
Age group tags? Why? Because some of us piss slower than others? Or is it just because some of us start pissing slower?
IIRC it happened multiple times in a short span. Is was trade idea artciles masqueraded as a "Rumor". So instead of trade ideas for Otto Porter, the article would be titled "Portland could land Otto Porter Jr, per source" and then the source would be another wesbites trade idea.
Of course he not. Ive actually been friendly wirh Riverman for the past couple of weeks at least. He's the one who's always said he wanted to forum to be friendlier! And then he's randomly calling me out for calling a source "BS" in 2016? Im the one who wants no battles now, yet this... It doesnt make sense.
This article is a trade idea thread pretending to be an actual rumor. Its like me coming up with a trade idea then making up something like "These teams are looking to make this deal". Hopefully you understand the context now.
I didn't bump this thread ….it was on the top of the thread page ….I don't vet sports articles that are editorials and consider them facts bones...even legit big names do the same thing....I didn't go back and even bother to read it....as I said...I didn't know until later that the thread was that old...it doesn't matter.....I'm not escalating this thread....actually mods can lock the damned thing....the speed of internet information false or otherwise makes it really easy for anyone to reference an article of interest and share it without vetting it. I've done that here, most posters have....like a fake Woj twitter acct.....but if one catches the glitch....snark isn't necessary in my view....you have definitely toned down and I don't have issues ...this thread was the first thing I opened with coffee this morning ….should have ended at one post
As a young man I could carve diamonds with my stream.....at 65....I can melt snow at best
You probably don't recall correctly because it was 3 fucking years ago
The thread is titled "CJ for Whiteside" so it has to be a bit old.
I just remember the types of articles I described being rampant around that time period.
Plumlee at the 4 wouldve been disastrous. Two guys that cant shoot outside of 5 feet away.
