CJ McCollum is the backup PG (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

CJ will be a backup pt guard just like Mo Williams or Jason Terry are backups..scoring 6 men..can distribute..he didn't study with Nash to be a power forward
 
I'm sure CJ won't be happy about not starting, but I bet they told him how he will be the focal point and get unlimited shots with that 2nd unit. I like the move.
 
I think Henderson and Crabbe are going to be solid at the 2
 
Just because he's the backup point guard doesn't necessarily mean he's not starting at SG as well. I still think mccollum starts at SG, subs out sometime in the first quarter for crabbe/Henderson, then takes over for Lillard at the beginning of second quarter.
 
Just because he's the backup point guard doesn't necessarily mean he's not starting at SG as well. I still think mccollum starts at SG, subs out sometime in the first quarter for crabbe/Henderson, then takes over for Lillard at the beginning of second quarter.

Yeah thats how I read the article; CJ is still likely starting at SG we'll just leave one of him or Dame in the game at all times. Thats what we did in the GS game last night; Dame sat and CJ played the point. CJ still started both halfs.
 
Sure, if you want each of them playing 40 mpg.

We don't.

Dame will be close; probably at 36. I'd rather see CJ lower around 32. You can still do that while starting both of them Stotts will just have to plan out rigid substitutions. Rotations would be more flexible with CJ off the bench. If we stick with both starting my guess is the team really wants to see how the duo fare against other starting backcourts.
 
First unit:

Lillard
McCollum
Aminu
Leonard
Plumlee

Second unit:

McCollum
Crabbe and Henderson
Harkless
Vonleh
Davis

--------
Nice
 
First unit:

Lillard
McCollum
Aminu
Leonard
Plumlee

Second unit:

McCollum
Crabbe and Henderson
Harkless
Vonleh
Davis

--------
Nice
To say Henderson will be the backup to CJ or Crabbe to start the season is just foolish.
 
To say Henderson will be the backup to CJ or Crabbe to start the season is just foolish.

If he's cleared he will be. He's a proven player who isn't even that old. Seriously since when is 27 old? And I'm not talking about just the beginning of the season.
 
CJ and Crabbe are both playing well. They've been playing with the whole team for months and with Dame/Meyers for years. They both started for a 54 win team; Hendo has never done that. I'm all for giving Hendo a chance but to expect him to come in off an injury having never played with any of his teammates and immediately win a starting job; well it just may not happen. Lets see him put together multiple productive games on the court until we think about penciling him in.
 
CJ and Crabbe are both playing well. They've been playing with the whole team for months and with Dame/Meyers for years. They both started for a 54 win team; Hendo has never done that. I'm all for giving Hendo a chance but to expect him to come in off an injury having never played with any of his teammates and immediately win a starting job; well it just may not happen. Lets see him put together multiple productive games on the court until we think about penciling him in.

Who said he's going to start? And btw he's proven more in this league than CJ and Crabbe combined. People are underrating him. He attacks the basket and has a bit of a post game. Those are two things we really don't have. IMO were going to struggle in half court so anyone that can play it is welcome. He will be in the rotation if he's healthy. It remains to be seen if he will be.
 
Last edited:
I had a feeling Stotts will mess up the rotation.
CJ is doing way too many shenanigans for a PG at this point, it's like making Jamal Crawford your backup PG.

Why come out with these kind of weird declarations when Fraizer is playing great?
 
It means what I said a couple days ago. We will run a 3 guard rotation Of Dame - CJ - Henderson and Frazier will get 5-8mpg maybe. That would put Pressey as our 4th string PG.
What about Allen Crabbe though? If Harkless continues to impress, he and Aminu will get minutes at SF. I wonder if Henderson won't be a bench rider like Kaman. He's not under contract next year.
 
What about Allen Crabbe though? If Harkless continues to impress, he and Aminu will get minutes at SF. I wonder if Henderson won't be a bench rider like Kaman. He's not under contract next year.

I expect to see Aminu starting at the 3 with Harkless backing him up.

Crabbe hit his shots and played well defensively against the Warriors. Perhaps this is his breakout year and become our starting SG for years to come!
 
Wouldn't it be nice if nobody gave a shit if they were starting or not and the coach could let the opposing team determine which lineup he wanted to use? You know: teams with a big scoring SG - start Crabbe or Henderson. Teams with a scrubby SG, we're fine with CJ.
 
I like Henderson's tenacity, but if Crabbe continues to play well, I don't imagine he'll be in the blazer's long term plans. Also he's coming off a hip surgery and hasn't even participated in contract drills. I think he'll only get into the lineup if someone starts stinking it up.
 
C.J will be the Blazers Jamal Crawford. So get used to it.

A me-first lockeroom cancer that takes ill-advised shots?

That Jamal Crawford?

Really? Did you think before you typed this, or did you draw this name out of a hat, and we just got lucky you didn't draw Travis Outlaw instead?
 
I like Henderson's tenacity, but if Crabbe continues to play well, I don't imagine he'll be in the blazer's long term plans. Also he's coming off a hip surgery and hasn't even participated in contract drills. I think he'll only get into the lineup if someone starts stinking it up.

Actually I'd prefer to see him play and play well so we can trade him at or before the deadline to a team that needs a solid SG, be nice to get something back for him
 
Last edited:
Wouldn't it be nice if nobody gave a shit if they were starting or not and the coach could let the opposing team determine which lineup he wanted to use? You know: teams with a big scoring SG - start Crabbe or Henderson. Teams with a scrubby SG, we're fine with CJ.

Yeah I dunno I think I'd rather just see us stick with a consistent rotation. What I mostly would be excited to see is play everyone except Dame under 30mpg so we have the energy to run around like madmen 48mins and wear out the other team. It doesn't have to all be fast breaks either just run around a ton in the half court offense and hustle to every spot on the floor.
 
I like Henderson's tenacity, but if Crabbe continues to play well, I don't imagine he'll be in the blazer's long term plans. Also he's coming off a hip surgery and hasn't even participated in contract drills. I think he'll only get into the lineup if someone starts stinking it up.

Unfortunately we won't get through 82 games without some extended injuries. Regardless of how well everyone plays Hendo will get a chance. Hell look we've already had Hendo, Alexander, Aminu, Harkless, Kaman, Lillard miss games and we're only two games through the preseason.
 
I had a feeling Stotts will mess up the rotation.
CJ is doing way too many shenanigans for a PG at this point, it's like making Jamal Crawford your backup PG.

Why come out with these kind of weird declarations when Fraizer is playing great?
Well for one, Frazier is a third string PG (great is subjective). Secondly, Neil and Terry have said all summer long CJ will play backup PG. It insures more important players (than Frazier) get consistent development time (Harkless, Crabbe, Pat).
 
A me-first lockeroom cancer that takes ill-advised shots?

That Jamal Crawford?

Really? Did you think before you typed this, or did you draw this name out of a hat, and we just got lucky you didn't draw Travis Outlaw instead?
C.J is a volume shooter. There's going to be nights when he will take ill-advised shots and there will be nights when he's just off. Then there will be times after the game when people come bitch about it in this forum. There will also be nights when he can't miss. I didn't say anything about his locker room presence.
 
This is weird. Cj is a guard, he will play some point, but wtf stotts. Really no need for declarations at this point.

Hendo will definitely get minutes anyways, so maybe that's the angle, cj gets backup minutes at both spots, everyone's happy.
 
The Blazers have officially declared that CJ is our backup PG.

I take that to mean he's the #2 one on the team. He will also play the two. He may be our #1 two, or our #2 two. Maybe even our #3 two.

Officially? So Stotts and Olshey saying it all summer long wasn't official?

Well for one, Frazier is a third string PG (great is subjective). Secondly, Neil and Terry have said all summer long CJ will play backup PG.

I took that to mean that he would get some minimal number of minutes this season at the one, e.g. one minute. He'd probably get more than one at the one, especially if he's more than the #3 one, but the summer sayings didn't say.
 
To quote Jalen Rose from his podcasts here, "positions were created so that a novice could understand the game of basketball."

Feel like it applies here.

CJ is a guard, a perimeter player with a good handle who initiates offense (whether it be for himself or his teammates). Think what Stotts is trying to say is that CJ will get PT with the second unit and have the ball in his hands. The "PG" thing is simply lip service.
 
I think CJ is backup PG for lack of anyone else.

The team is 2-3 deep at every position but PG.

For example...

If Leonard misses games, Davis or Vonleh can play and it's not a giant step down.

If Plumlee misses games, Davis, Kaman, or even Leonard or Vonleh can fill in.

If Aminu or Harkless misses games, Crabbe is more than a decent sub.

Crabbe also gives us excellent depth at SG.

But at PG...

Lillard misses a few games and it's CJ (a SG, not a PG) playing PG with a massive drop off to the reserve, Frazier.

It's a long season and guys are sure to miss games here and there for all sorts of reasons.

From Yahoo! Blazers page:

upload_2015-10-14_6-43-11.png
 
I think CJ is backup PG for lack of anyone else.

The team is 2-3 deep at every position but PG.

For example...

If Leonard misses games, Davis or Vonleh can play and it's not a giant step down.

If Plumlee misses games, Davis, Kaman, or even Leonard or Vonleh can fill in.

If Aminu or Harkless misses games, Crabbe is more than a decent sub.

Crabbe also gives us excellent depth at SG.

But at PG...

Lillard misses a few games and it's CJ (a SG, not a PG) playing PG with a massive drop off to the reserve, Frazier.

It's a long season and guys are sure to miss games here and there for all sorts of reasons.

From Yahoo! Blazers page:

View attachment 6211

I agree with this. I do think Frazier could be just as good with most of the PG responsibilities, ie bringing the ball up court against pressure, passing, defense.....

But in Terry's offense the PG apparently needs to be able to shoot, and that's where the drop off will occur. Maybe Stotts likes CJ as the BU PG because he doesn't have to change the offense when Dame goes out. If Frazier is in he pretty much becomes strictly a distributor. (except for the occasional wide open 3) Someone else will have to step up on offense and be aggressive with the ball in his hands. Not a lot of candidates. Possibly Henderson or Crabbe????
 
I agree with this. I do think Frazier could be just as good with most of the PG responsibilities, ie bringing the ball up court against pressure, passing, defense.....

But in Terry's offense the PG apparently needs to be able to shoot, and that's where the drop off will occur. Maybe Stotts likes CJ as the BU PG because he doesn't have to change the offense when Dame goes out. If Frazier is in he pretty much becomes strictly a distributor. (except for the occasional wide open 3) Someone else will have to step up on offense and be aggressive with the ball in his hands. Not a lot of candidates. Possibly Henderson or Crabbe????

How would the lineup look if we had a guy like DJ Augustin as backup? Or CJ Watson (another CJ!)?

This guys were had for vet minimum, I believe (Augustin since signed a little bit bigger contract).

I'm not really seeing much potential in Frazier.
 
How would the lineup look if we had a guy like DJ Augustin as backup? Or CJ Watson (another CJ!)?

This guys were had for vet minimum, I believe (Augustin since signed a little bit bigger contract).

I'm not really seeing much potential in Frazier.
I've been wanting Watson here for nearly five years. He's be a perfect backup PG.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top