Classic example of why Brooks is a terrible writer

[dumpstralmannow]

In his article today about the game, not one mention of Kreider who was the best player on the ice. I swear, that scrub needs to retire.

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Dump he won't retire he has you to thank reading his articles

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk

 

[dumpstralmannow]

Al, here is a thought. Why don't you post something that isn't just taking the opposite of what I post just to be a pain in the ass. Are you capable of that any longer?

 

[Puckmeat]

I'll take a different approach, lol. Who did he talk about in the article, and is there a link to this, or is it something you've subscribed to? Also, while I was very impressed with Krieder, I thought the whole team played pretty well, until about the last 5 minutes or so, when Montreal woke up and finally started playing. The only exceptions would be Pouliot and Faulk, and they didn't play badly, they just played.

 

[Disturbed]

Kreider played great. So did the defense and Cam and everyone played well. As good as Kreider was Price was the best player on the ice

 

[cagedlion]

I don't read his scribble. In New York City it is a joke that he is 'the' hockey reporter.
That alone tells me the sport does not get the respect it claims it deserves. He is crap.
Until this town get legit reporters, hockey flounders in the media.

 

[dumpstralmannow]

The other guy who writes on the Rangers at least doesn't bitch and complain every article like Brooks does.