Is progression an amendment I haven't heard of. Maybe your mortgage should be a living document. House is worth more? Well, your payment goes up.
>>>>Good question Bodyman.
what's wrong with progression?
>>>Everything if you expect the court to provide you with progress. If you offer and amendment that you view as progress then I am not opposed to that at all, even if I don't agree with your amendment.
Our Constitution has been amended throughout the years.
>>>Yes, and some amendments were sorely needed and long over due. Some were not so good and repealed. Not a thing wrong with this process.
When did you want this to stop happening
>>> I do not wish to see the process stop. Not sure why you think this would be the case?
why would anyone compare what the original 13 colonies mapped out with what America is today?
>>> I didn't. Why do you ask?
I think you're stereotyping generations and assuming what they favor
>>> Perhaps I am, I would hope to be wrong. However, I do not see one post in this thread that supports the idea of appointing a judge to the court that will follow the Constitution with the philosophy of original intent. If you do not like what the Constitutions says then it should be amended if agreeable, rather than rely on the court to reinterpret what it says to fit the current progressive view.
you seem to want to hang on to pre Civil War attitudes
>>> Wild man! I say what I mean, but I can't help what you infer.
>>> A good example. This has been front and center for far too long now. A bull shit ruling by the court did not end the question. An amendment put through process should have been done.
I would support it even though I find the idea repugnant. I would even be in favor of having the Federal Government pay for the proceedure when appropriate. We do not need more feral children in this country.
>>>The right to bare arm shall not be infringed. If you wish to remove that right or infringe on it, then lets see the amendment.
Sounds like the Constitution party would be your party of choice.
>>>It might seem that way, but I am not likely to cast a vote that probably has no meaning. As it stands now, I agree with the Democrats about 10% of the time,
with the Republicans about 75% of the time. No other party is relevant even if you agree with them 90+% of the time.
As it is today, I agree with Trump more that the Republicans and Hillary on about nothing, especially her statement about appointing justices that will enable the progressive agenda[/QUOTE]
