adisodes
Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2007
- Messages
- 342
- Likes
- 2
- Points
- 18
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (adisodes @ Mar 5 2008, 11:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Mar 5 2008, 10:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Denny Crane @ Mar 5 2008, 10:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Both states combined won't push either candidate over the top (enough votes to win the nomination).
They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote.
Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div>
They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise.
And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle.
</div>
Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that?
I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit.
</div>
First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life.
How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case.
And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly.
</div>
Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches.
</div>
She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004.
</div>
He has changed positions on the war. You can find the video on youtube probably where he says he would have conducted the war the same Bush would. Clinton supported giving the troops armor, Obama didn't. She does not have connections to Rezko. Okay so she returned money cause of people she knows, then why doesn't Obama return the hundreds of thousands Rezko helped him raise? She was in White Water? Are you serious? That was nothing! They investigated that throughout Clinton's entire presidency basically. There's nothing there.
They SHOULD redo the votes so people get to exercise their right to vote.
Tho they already did vote. Can't take that back.</div>
They should and they will, I have not heard any real reason to think otherwise.
And I've said before that Obama is full of shit as well (no duh so is anyone that runs for this race), some people just don't follow my posts very carefully. I don't buy everything he says, but he's my candidate this cycle.
</div>
Okay so my bad for not memorizing all your posts? Cause I have time to do that?
I'm just saying people give her a lot of flack when Obama is even more full of shit.
</div>
First, you need to stop generalizing me with whatever pussy ass Obama supporter you know in real life.
How do you even know he's more full of shit? I'd like to hear that case.
And even if he was, he wants the nominee to win fairly.
</div>
Tony Rezko. Obama's connection to subprime mortgage sharks. One of his campaign people in California was giving out fliers telling republicans to register as democrats for a day to stop Clinton. He's been talking shit about her for over a year now in her stump speeches and when she finally attacks him he tries to look all innocent. He talks about giving kids health care in Illinois when it was a subdivision of CHIP. He didn't do anything for the innercities in Chicago. When it was time to vote for Iran, he didn't have the time to stop campaigning there when Hillary did -- and then he attacks her for voting that way. The whole Canada/NAFTA thing. There's a lot of shit he has done that has been going completely against the whole 'politics of hope' he preaches.
</div>
She's been saying that he was not 100% Pro-Choice, and he was. She says he waffled on the war, he didn't, you just don't send troops out to die because you won't give them armor. She has connections to the same slumlord, she's had to return more money because of shitty people she knows, she was in White water, she's said offensive stuff to Jewish people directly from her mouth. She has the same BS views on Nafta, and lied about not supporting it in a direct quote in 2004.
</div>
He has changed positions on the war. You can find the video on youtube probably where he says he would have conducted the war the same Bush would. Clinton supported giving the troops armor, Obama didn't. She does not have connections to Rezko. Okay so she returned money cause of people she knows, then why doesn't Obama return the hundreds of thousands Rezko helped him raise? She was in White Water? Are you serious? That was nothing! They investigated that throughout Clinton's entire presidency basically. There's nothing there.
