CNN Poll: Clinton outperformed Bush

[Justice]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ May 30 2006, 07:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It doesn't matter THAT IS NOT OUR BUISNESS WE ARE NOT THE WORLD LEADERS, that is what i'm trying to get through to you, we don't run this world.</div>Protecting ourselves is not our business? Oh GArenas, you are such a card.My point is that the UN doesn't do a good job of controling what goes on in the world. We don't control the world, but we do have a large part in it and thusly, have say in what goes on. You can't even get your facts straight, let alone make a worthwhile argument for why the UN is worth a dime. I understood your point the first time and rejected it; putting in in CAPITAL LETTERS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE ME AGREE WITH YOU EVEN IF YOU THINK YOU ARE MORE RIGHT THAN ME BECAUSE YOU THINK SOMETHING BASED ON PERSONAL OPINION AND ZERO FACTS. Thanks.

 

[GArenas]

We're not protecting ourselves there was never a threat, why are you even arguing with me anymore, you're not saying anything that makes sense.

 

[Justice]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ May 31 2006, 07:55 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>We're not protecting ourselves there was never a threat, why are you even arguing with me anymore, you're not saying anything that makes sense.</div>

Obviously you know nothing about the enriched uranium that Iran got that everyone was all upset over. You never said anything that made sense.Edit: Okay, okay. I will stop arguing, since you have nothing to say, apparently. I just want to see one fact out of you. What is the name of this "contract" we signed to not have nuclear arms?

 

[GArenas]

Wow, are you kidding me. I never said we signed a contract to not have nucleur arms. Oh my god, I have never seen someone as dumb as you in this political debate. You didn't portray a signle argument that supported Bush watsoever, you did not prove a single point. What are you twelve? Do you really understand this world so little. Also Iran is allowed to have what they want, as long as they don't make threats with it, and they haven't. I'm Iranian and you have no right to attack us, we're allowed to have what we want, if we abuse it believe me that I wouldn't mind the U.N. attacking, which they will if their is a reason to. What I will give to you is you're a pretty good debater, just dont agree with your side.

 

[Justice]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GArenas @ May 31 2006, 05:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Wow, are you kidding me. I never said we signed a contract to not have nucleur arms. Oh my god, I have never seen someone as dumb as you in this political debate. You didn't portray a signle argument that supported Bush watsoever, you did not prove a single point. What are you twelve? Do you really understand this world so little. Also Iran is allowed to have what they want, as long as they don't make threats with it, and they haven't. I'm Iranian and you have no right to attack us, we're allowed to have what we want, if we abuse it believe me that I wouldn't mind the U.N. attacking, which they will if their is a reason to. What I will give to you is you're a pretty good debater, just dont agree with your side.</div>Okay then, if you look at the link I gave earlier, you would see that only certain countries are allowed to have nuclear arms. This is supported by the UN, not opposed by it. You said they disagreed with the US, and I'm trying to figure out when or where they disagreed with us.And I already told you that I don't support Bush. Calling me twelve doesn't make you look any brighter than you're looking already, especially when you can't get your facts straight.I didn't claim anyone should attack Iran, but I don't get why you think the US should follow every rule, but Iran shouldn't. That's what I'm trying to figure out. The UN allows America to have nuclear arms, but not Iran. All I want is for you to disprove this with facts and not just personal opinion (and calling me twelve).

 

[GArenas]

All of this is true, as you are saying. However it is the UN's buisness to take care of Iran, not our decision. When the U.N. decides that htey have had enough, then we should attack together, not alone without the approval. As for them disagreeing with the US, I'm talking about Iraq (where no nucleur weapons were found). As for the other factor, I'm arguing the U.N. contract that is passed about the nucleur arms, as long as you have showed no sign of danger when holding them you shouldn't be restricted from them. Also it is the U.N. that passed this law, so it is the U.N. all together to decide to take care of it.

 

[SirLaker]

clinton and bush both suckbut i disagree with the clinton being impeachedfor what?cheating on his wife and lying about it?i mean cmonBTWi realize there are other reasons dont worry im not an idot