CNN Sources: 3 al Qaeda operatives took part in Benghazi attack

[jlprk]

Yes, a couple of Democrats talked a good game against Iraq while Clinton was President. Yes, more Democrats temporarily followed the Republican lead while Bush was President.

But it was a Republican administration which led Democrats into these stupid wars. Not the reverse.

 

[Denny Crane]

Yes, a couple of Democrats talked a good game against Iraq while Clinton was President. Yes, more Democrats temporarily followed the Republican lead while Bush was President.

But it was a Republican administration which led Democrats into these stupid wars. Not the reverse.

A couple? LOL. 30 in the Senate, another 150 in the house (at least).


And it was Clinton who made the policy of regime change in Iraq.

 

[jlprk]

So Clinton started the war on Saddam while the first Bush was President. I didn't know that.

Talk is cheap, and that's all that Democrats did while in power. There would have been no actual wars without Republican presidents. You know that as well as I do.

 

[Denny Crane]

So Clinton started the war on Saddam while the first Bush was President. I didn't know that.

Talk is cheap, and that's all that Democrats did while in power. There would have been no actual wars without Republican presidents. You know that as well as I do.

You think you're clever.

Democrats get 50,000 troops killed in police actions. They weren't declared wars.

Oh wait, WW I and WW II were actual wars.

 

[jlprk]

I better stop before you say that when Cyrus sailed to Cyprus to beat Darius in the Peloponnesian War, it was Clinton's fault.

I wouldn't want to stray from all those verified facts you use.

 

[Denny Crane]

I better stop before you say that when Cyrus sailed to Cyprus to beat Darius in the Peloponnesian War, it was Clinton's fault.

I wouldn't want to stray from all those verified facts you use.

Vietnam never happened, right? It passes the duck test. Looks like a war, walks like a war, quacks like a war. It must be a war.

 

[jlprk]

It is certainly timely for you to broach your ducks, my fine feathered friend, because today you have gone certifiable crackers. I don't want to be the one to do it, so please--call the government right now and have yourself committed.

 

[jlprk]

I just called the high-end place closest to you. It's the evening, but they can send an ambulance if you call right now.

 

[Denny Crane]

You suggest Vietnam didn't happen? or LBJ was a republican? Or JFK?

Or that Truman was a republican who started the Korean war? Or that FDR before him was a republican that somehow set it up?

So Clinton started the war on Saddam while the first Bush was President. I didn't know that.

Talk is cheap, and that's all that Democrats did while in power. There would have been no actual wars without Republican presidents. You know that as well as I do.

Your own words, in bold above, are utter bullshit.

 

[Denny Crane]

Multiple choice trivia question.

Q. In which of these countries did President Clinton (DEMOCRAT) use military force?

1) Bosnia
2) Kosovo
3) Haiti
4) Iraq
5) Afghanistan
6) Somalia
7) Sudan
8) Liberia
9) East Timor
10) Serbia
11) Sierra Leone
12) Yemen
13) All of the above

 

[jlprk]

You suggest Vietnam didn't happen? or LBJ was a republican? Or JFK?

Or that Truman was a republican who started the Korean war? Or that FDR before him was a republican that somehow set it up?

Your own words, in bold above, are utter bullshit.

Yes, Denny, that must be what I said. The world can be a calm and gentle place for the weary. Just step high into the back of this vehicle and don't bump your head. Has that happened to you before?

 

[Denny Crane]

Yes, Denny, that must be what I said. The world can be a calm and gentle place for the weary. Just step high into the back of this vehicle and don't bump your head. Has that happened to you before?

You said there'd be no wars without republican presidents. Vietnam happened without republican presidents. So did Korea.

Next baseless claim?

 

[PapaG]

Most transparent administration ever. That the media would accept this type of action is probably more disgusting, though.

Probably went something like this. "Please keep ignoring this story, because it's really, really damaging to a lot of us".

Watergate 2013 – only this time, the media is in on the collusion instead of investigating and reporting it.

W.H. holds off-the-record Benghazi briefing

http://www.politico.com/blogs/media...rd-benghazi-briefing-163704.html#.UY0_rCerNpR

The White House held an off-the-record briefing with reporters on Friday afternoon to discuss recent revelations about the Benghazi investigation, sources familiar with the meeting tell POLITICO.

The meeting began around 12:45 p.m. and postponed the daily, on-the-record White House press briefing to 1:45 p.m. White House press secretary Jay Carney did not respond to a request for confirmation of the meeting.

The off-the-record session was announced to reporters in the wake of an ABC News report showing that White House and State Dept. officials were involved in revising the now-discredited CIA talking points about the attack on Benghazi.

Emails obtained by ABC News show that State Dept. spokesperson Victoria Nuland requested that the CIA scrub references to an Al Qaeda-linked group, which, Nuland told White House officials, “could be abused by members [of Congress] to beat up the State Department for not paying attention to warnings."

 

[PapaG]

You said there'd be no wars without republican presidents. Vietnam happened without republican presidents. So did Korea.

Next baseless claim?

So did WWII with FDR as President.

So did WWI with Woodrow Wilson as President.

jlprk sucks at history.

 

[PapaG]

She stood in front of those coffins and knowingly lied. What an incredibly despicable human being, with her crocodile tears as she knows there is a cover-up in process to cover her own ass.

Clinton said the rage and violence aimed at American missions was prompted by 'an awful Internet video that we had nothing to do with.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Obama-Clinton-pay-tribute.html#ixzz2Sv46zC5D
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[PapaG]

At least the PBS WH reporter knows something is fishy. Were the reporters given questions for the briefing that is starting soon?

 

[Denny Crane]

I think this was rather transparent. It wasn't more than the next day before everyone knew what had happened, almost all the details even. Everyone knew the administration was in campaign mode spinning away.

I don't think the truth would have changed the election outcome, but the lack of truth speaks wonders for what the campaign thought of the voter's intelligence.

 

[PapaG]

James Carney just blamed the CIA. Bad move...

Fox's @jamesrosenfnc reports that "several more" #Benghazi whistleblowers are considering coming forward, including CIA officials.— Stephen Hayes (@stephenfhayes) May 10, 2013

 

[DaLincolnJones]

I think this was rather transparent. It wasn't more than the next day before everyone knew what had happened, almost all the details even. Everyone knew the administration was in campaign mode spinning away.

I don't think the truth would have changed the election outcome, but the lack of truth speaks wonders for what the campaign thought of the voter's intelligence.

at this point it is moot re: the election outcome

what pisses me off is two fold

one, Our guys kill badguy numero uno one year ago..pre election there was eerything disclosed tot he point of putting the very lives of theheros that did the job at risk. Pre election there was a big time movie and no less than ten specials on channels like thehistory channel, military channel discovery channel and so on. EVERY fucking one paints that fucking pos as a hero...

eight months ago..almost as much time as the above event, benghazi happens after the prez claims that the war on terror had been won..we still arebeing fed BS from the white house

 

[Denny Crane]

You act like the administration is competent.

That's the first mistake people make.

Ok, so they lied and they'll be caught in their lie. I don't see a constitutional crisis here.

 

[PapaG]

The WH presser w/Carney was a hoot! Reporters actually grilling him on obvious lies, and he actually tried to blame MITT ROMNEY!!!

Classic...

 

[PapaG]

You act like the administration is competent.

That's the first mistake people make.

Ok, so they lied and they'll be caught in their lie. I don't see a constitutional crisis here.

Watergate wasn't a constitutional crisis, either, and nobody died because of it.

 

[Denny Crane]

Watergate wasn't a constitutional crisis, either, and nobody died because of it.

Yeah it was. Nixon illegally used the FBI and other agencies to threaten people on his enemies list. That's the tip of a really big iceberg.

 

[PapaG]

Yeah it was. Nixon illegally used the FBI and other agencies to threaten people on his enemies list. That's the tip of a really big iceberg.

Bill Clinton illegally had access to FBI files as well, including many of his GOP 'enemies'. Funny how that wasn't considered a 'constitutional crisis', and was explained as a "mistake".

http://articles.chicagotribune.com/...est-bureaucratic-snafu-fbi-files-enemies-list

 

[Denny Crane]

Clinton isn't Obama.

 

[PapaG]

Wow, it's fun watching the press actually do their jobs. Carney just keeps repeating the same lies over and over again.

 

[oldguy]

(Reuters) - The Obama administration denied Republican accusations of a cover-up in last year's deadly attack in Libya, moving on Friday to defuse a renewed political controversy after a news report said memos on the incident were edited to omit references to a CIA warning of an al Qaeda threat.

ABC News reported emails between the White House, State Department and intelligence agencies about the Benghazi attack went through 12 extensive revisions and were scrubbed clean of warnings about a militant threat.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/05/10/us-usa-benghazi-idUSBRE9490VD20130510?feedType=RSS

What does it matter?

Because they covered up what happened during the run-up to an election for the president of the United States. It could have changed the outcome.

You can't handle the truth! We'll tell you what to believe. Vote for us, then we'll "get to the bottom of all this."

Baaaaaaa

Go Blazers

 

[Denny Crane]

Binders of women was a campaign issue. Benghazi wasn't.

It wasn't going to be, no matter what.

 

[PapaG]

Binders of women was a campaign issue. Benghazi wasn't.

It wasn't going to be, no matter what.

It's going to be a big issue for Clinton in 2016, and it sounds like Petreaus is going back to testify again to refute the administration's claims. Already there are rumblings of a subpoena for Hillary to come back and answer questions under oath this time.

"What difference does it make" is going to ruin her.

 

[Denny Crane]

It's going to be a big issue for Clinton in 2016, and it sounds like Petreaus is going back to testify again to refute the administration's claims. Already there are rumblings of a subpoena for Hillary to come back and answer questions under oath this time.

"What difference does it make" is going to ruin her.

There will be something like binders of women, and it'll be 24/7 on the networks, instead.