OT CNN SUES WHITEHOUSE

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I'm 100 percent sure what the difference is. YouTube has every right to ban Alex Jones.

Nobody is stopping Jim Acosta and CNN from reporting anything.

I'm not sure why you guys don't understand the difference.

Uh huh, until my last post to you which was addressing something you posted my only post in this thread was a gif that said Who gives a fuck. So I'm not really sure "which guys" you think I'm a part of in this argument, lol.
 
One just needs to be a passive viewer of some of the news to know that Trump's preferred target is CNN as he pretty much bad mouths the network at every rally or press conference and much more than any of the other networks.
I believe that to be totally correct. Perhaps the President's statement confirming that might be some sort of evidence.
 
One more question for y'all.

There are rules for taking press passes away from people at the White House. The judge said they weren't followed.

Soooooooooooo.....

If you're going to interpret the First Amendment as the absolute right of freedom of the press shouldn't THOSE rules be unconstitutional?
The judge doesn't think so. I consider that to be pretty strong evidence.
 
They will lose the First Amendment case just like Alex Jones would. People sue all the time doesn't mean they'll win.

Boy old Jim Acosta should pay his bills late and challenge late fees under the First Amendment.
It's already been successfully challenged. Not the fees entirely but the amount.
 
Two strawmen in one short post. At least you're efficient.

Acosta already won. He gets his hard pass back immediately. The First Amendment case will only serve to set a precedent, one way or the other.

Yes, people sue all the time. Doesn't mean he'll lose. In fact, it's totally irrelevant. Each case is different.

BNM
Did you read anything about this or just heard from a guy who knows a guy?

He won TEMPORARILY based on the Fifth Amendment claim.

Why can't anyone besides Stevenson admit it?
 
Uh huh, until my last post to you which was addressing something you posted my only post in this thread was a gif that said Who gives a fuck. So I'm not really sure "which guys" you think I'm a part of in this argument, lol.
You don't seem to understand what the First Amendment says if you are going to accuse me of not understanding it. So you're lumped in with the rest of them until you explain how I was wrong.
 
You don't seem to understand what the First Amendment says if you are going to accuse me of not understanding it. So you're lumped in with the rest of them until you explain how I was wrong.

LOL!

This statement is wrong.

The left sure loves the First Amendment when YouTube bans Alex Jones.

I assumed you didn't know what the 1st Amendment was since you posted it.

I guess you're just bored and wanting to argue.

Have fun!
 
You know the one thing missing from this discussion? A persuasive argument why it is A) ethical to lie, and B) ethical to bully someone who catches you.

Even if Trump had the law on his side (and I don't believe he does) he is still a scumbag.
 
Acosta is such an embarrassment to our country as a faux journalist, but he'd be great starring in one of those "Child's mind in an adult's body" kid-flicks.

He won't be able to control himself and he's as good as gone.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders also implemented a series of rules that will govern White House press conferences going forward.

According to Sanders, the new rules are:

  • A journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then will yield the floor to other journalists.
  • At the discretion of the President or other White House official taking questions, a follow-up question or questions may be permitted; and where a follow up has been allowed and asked, the questioner will then yield the floor.
  • Yielding the floor” includes, when applicable, physically surrendering the microphone to White House staff for use by the next questioner.
  • Failure to abide by any of rules may result in suspension or revocation of the journalist’s hard pass.
“We are mindful that a more elaborate and comprehensive set of rules might need to be devised," Sanders said.

donald-trump-jim-acosta-Reuters.jpg

CNN's Jim Acosta questions U.S. President Donald Trump during his news conference following Tuesday's midterm U.S. congressional elections at the White House in Washington, U.S., November 7, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC189F0AFAA0


“The White House’s interaction with the press is, and generally should be, subject to a natural give-and-take. President Trump believes strongly in the First Amendment, and a free press and is the most accessible President in modern history. It would be a great loss for all if, instead of relying on the professionalism of White House journalists, we were compelled to devise a lengthy and detailed code of conduct for White House events,” Sanders said to conclude her statement.
 
Acosta is such an embarrassment to our country as a faux journalist, but he'd be great starring in one of those "Child's mind in an adult's body" kid-flicks.

He won't be able to control himself and he's as good as gone.


You spelled "Trump" and "President" wrong.

You're welcome for the tips.
 
Acosta is such an embarrassment to our country as a faux journalist, but he'd be great starring in one of those "Child's mind in an adult's body" kid-flicks.

He won't be able to control himself and he's as good as gone.

White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders also implemented a series of rules that will govern White House press conferences going forward.

According to Sanders, the new rules are:

  • A journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then will yield the floor to other journalists.
  • At the discretion of the President or other White House official taking questions, a follow-up question or questions may be permitted; and where a follow up has been allowed and asked, the questioner will then yield the floor.
  • Yielding the floor” includes, when applicable, physically surrendering the microphone to White House staff for use by the next questioner.
  • Failure to abide by any of rules may result in suspension or revocation of the journalist’s hard pass.
“We are mindful that a more elaborate and comprehensive set of rules might need to be devised," Sanders said.

donald-trump-jim-acosta-Reuters.jpg

CNN's Jim Acosta questions U.S. President Donald Trump during his news conference following Tuesday's midterm U.S. congressional elections at the White House in Washington, U.S., November 7, 2018. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst - RC189F0AFAA0


“The White House’s interaction with the press is, and generally should be, subject to a natural give-and-take. President Trump believes strongly in the First Amendment, and a free press and is the most accessible President in modern history. It would be a great loss for all if, instead of relying on the professionalism of White House journalists, we were compelled to devise a lengthy and detailed code of conduct for White House events,” Sanders said to conclude her statement.
Yeah, how do you know you can ask a follow up? This is going to cause quite a stir because it flies in the face of long standing tradition.
And what about yielding the microphone before your question is addressed?
Yeah, the new rules need to be reviewed and this time by someone that knows their ass from a hole in the ground.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top