Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bears mentioning.
First time since Ted Williams accomplished this feat....45 years ago!!
MVP. Hopefully the MLB gets that right.
if mike trout doesnt win it it will be understandable, but a mistake
if mike trout doesnt win it it will be understandable, but a mistake
Which is why Cabrera should win the Hank Aaron and Silver Slugger. There's more to baseball than what goes on in the batters' box, which is why Verlander was able to win.
I really disagree about Mike Trout winning
Both had fielding ratings over .900. Trout was better, but Cabrera plays 3rd base. What else does he need to do?
Comparing an infielder to an outfielder is like comparing an infantryman to a drone pilot.
Or 60 homers against weenie-arms throwing 70 mph to 61 homers against aces throwing 90mph and faster.
the importance of a centerfielder is comparable to only shortstop and catcher defensively
they stick the bad fielders at 1b, 3b, rf, and lf usually
You didn't fix anything.
Ruth hit his 60 homers against a league with fewer teams, thus deeper pitching staffs.
True dat!
Thanks for the correction.
In Ruth's day most players were not even professionals. It didn't pay enough so they were farmers or milkmen and pitched as a summer job or 2nd job or as a sort of hobby or to impress their girlfriend. There were no relief pitchers and they were expected to pitch all nine innings every outing. They played games nearly every day. There was no science to it, no talented and wise pitching coaches, and nearly every pitcher just made up his own style and often goofy windup. Batters typically hit above .350. For a big guy who could swing a bat, no matter how slowly, it was like shooting ducks in a barrel.
