Constitutional amendment for a balanced budget? (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Any action that doesn't "spend it".

That doesn't entirely make sense.

Consider the govt. burns old worn out currency all the time and replaces it with nice newly printed money. If the govt. sat on $200B a year in surpluses, after 10 years, it'd be like taking in $2T in old currency and not printing any new money. That would drive prices on most everything through the floor since there'd be fewer dollars to buy everything that's sold. Everyone would have to take pay cuts. The only things that wouldn't drop in price would be mortgage payments, the cost of higher education, and medical bills. Yikes.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top