OT Coronavirus: America in chaos, News and Updates. One million Americans dead and counting

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Sorry about your mom.
Mine had not metastasized so it made since to cut the prostate out, they can leave all the nerves alone too. If a guy's going to get cancer Prostate is the one to get because if caught early it can be treated.
 
image-asset.png
 

The ability that Trump has to make EVERYTHING political is amazing to me. It's almost as amazing to me as the way that the Dems jump at every little laser pointer light that he flashes their way. This malarial drug is being seen as either a "You believe in this crap just because Trump mentioned it, so you're a Trumpanzee", or "You won't even consider it as a viable treatment because Trump mentioned it, so you're a Libtard". Crazy.

LOL, BTW.
 
The ability that Trump has to make EVERYTHING political is amazing to me. It's almost as amazing to me as the way that the Dems jump at every little laser pointer light that he flashes their way. This malarial drug is being seen as either a "You believe in this crap just because Trump mentioned it, so you're a Trumpanzee", or "You won't even consider it as a viable treatment because Trump mentioned it, so you're a Libtard". Crazy.

LOL, BTW.
India banning exports of the drug and the doctor in CA that @EL PRESIDENTE linked the interview with are enough to know who is right between those two extremes.

I'm fine with leftists CNN watchers avoiding this drug and I'm fine if Fox viewers drink fish tank cleaner (I don't know if the people who did watch Fox)

That helps people with Lupus and RA get their medication because they need it now and leaves enough for medical professionals to take and leave enough for people that go to the hospital for the virus.
 
I guess that woman who fed her husband the fish tank cleaner wasn't exactly a Trump supporter, but I think her husband was.....
 
what you locked in haste was yankee and i making ground and moving close to an agreement on how we can all debate better.

not all oosts were on the up and up, but show me a thread that is?

there weren't any personal insults or attacks. It was just heated because we were discussing how we can try to better communicate to leave that path open for productiveness.
The real issue here to me is the people who complained and flagged. Complained about what?
Do mods suggest to complainers that maybe they should just move on and start a new productive thread instead of wasting their time complaining?

i have seen soooo many more worse convos in here not get locked, som im perplexed on how people though this one was soooo bad to complain about. Unless those same complainers are the same ones who attack anyone who isnt a Trump hater.

Then it gets further compounded by anOther mod with strong opinions who regularly states his as facts without debate, made a post stating as much and the thread was then locked.
My suggestion is if mods are soo politically heated, maybe they should be involved in political threads or not have the ability to mod i na thread they engage in

lets put it another way.


how would mods like it if Trump turned off your phones because a few people complained about how nasty some of you are to aNd aBout him????


I got muted when i was trying to be constructive with yankee, regardless of what barfos opinion is of it.
Didn't sit well.


I did see some posters beginning to put aside their differences and finding common ground in the thread. But, it was also becoming a pissing contest between others.

It was often very heated. There were attacks and people going at each other personally, rather than the matter being discussed (politics, Trump, etc). I was glad to see some of you move closer to common ground.

I admit there was some productive parts of the thread, but there was also a lot of chaos. I shut it down mostly because I realized how preoccupied with the the thread we had all become. I hoped in locking it, we could all take a break from it and move on to more productive things for what remained of the day. Most everyone seems to be getting along better this morning (even if some are grinning and bearing), so maybe closing it and allowing some time for reflection wasn't a terrible thing.

Closing the thread was not personal. I did not seek to cut anyone off. I wasn't being vindictive. I wasn't trying to give anyone the last say (@Strenuus was still typing his response when I closed the thread. He had no idea I was closing it. I saw that he drew the ire of several of you and I would have spoke up sooner, but I was having game night with the fams. Sorry Stren for putting you in that position), I was not trying to abuse my power or anything so nefarious. My intentions and reasons were good.

There were posters who flagged some posts. As moderators we ask posters to do such when they suspect violations of the rules. Some of those flags were rejected, some were found to be correct in assertion. We take them all seriously, and while I understand your objection, we cannot advise posters to not flag posts they believe to be attacks/insults etc, just because other posters feel differently. We do prefer posters flag serious infractions, but we are glad the system is being used. It does help us.

I agree, I have too seen far worse threads, but I have disclosed the reasons I closed this one, like them or not. You might be surprised who some of the "complainers" are. We keep that private for obvious reasons. And, no not because we are some evil deep state cabal. As Moderators we aren't out to get anybody, we aren't trying to instil a certain political agenda on the forum, etc etc.

We have tried to be fair. Our framework is not based around politics, though we have tried to balance conservative and liberal voices on our staff.

We aren't wardens or police officers. We aren't your parents. We like to think of ourselves as fire fighters, putting out the flames before arguments get to three alarm fires.

Many here post opinions as though they are facts. If you see them as opinion and not fact, take it as such. Mods are posters too, just because we are also watching over threads doesn't mean we don't have a right to express our opinions too, even if you don't agree with them. Sometimes, like everyone else, those opinions get heated. We are after all humans and not robots.

I get that you are angry about a mod having the final post in the thread. (Again, he was expressing his opinion as a poster and didn't know the thread was being closed)You thought he posted and then closed it to get the last word. I understand the frustration that caused. Again, I am sorry I didn't clear matters up earlier, I was with my family.

So, your thought is mods shouldn't be invloved in heated political threads? I don't see that happening. Again, mods too have the right to express their opinions here. I get what you are saying, but if you ask us to abstain from one thread or type of thread then we would have to abstain from others. Then we might become the very thing you fear we are, some power hungry overseers.

I do see what you are saying about moderators having other moderators not involved in the heated thread mediate those threads. I will bring this up with the other mods. I had considered this when I closed the thread. I knew there would be some voicing of my having been part of the thread as bias in closing it.

I wouldn't put it past Trump to shutter the phones of those critical of him. That was not the case here. I understand you feel like you were shut out. My decision to close it had nothing to do with your and Barfo's difference of opinion. Nor, was it to mute you or anyone else. I have stated my reasons. I stand by them.
 
Biased flagging, secret PMs...secret clique.

Nothing so nefarious or shadowy. There is no secret cabal here. No secret cliques. We are not the illuminati. It is actually not as prodigious or fantastical as you make it out to be, and in fact you would probably find the reality of moderating here far less alluring and far more dispiriting.
 
Nothing so nefarious or shadowy. There is no secret cabal here. No secret cliques. We are not the illuminati. It is actually not as prodigious or fantastical as you make it out to be, and in fact you would probably find the reality of moderating here far less alluring and far more dispiriting.
I want to be the Illuminati though. :(
 
Nothing so nefarious or shadowy. There is no secret cabal here. No secret cliques. We are not the illuminati. It is actually not as prodigious or fantastical as you make it out to be, and in fact you would probably find the reality of moderating here far less alluring and far more dispiriting.

Of course not. Nul Militia (militia of nothing) is an anagram of illuminati.
 
I did see some posters beginning to put aside their differences and finding common ground in the thread. But, it was also becoming a pissing contest between others.

It was often very heated. There were attacks and people going at each other personally, rather than the matter being discussed (politics, Trump, etc). I was glad to see some of you move closer to common ground.

I admit there was some productive parts of the thread, but there was also a lot of chaos. I shut it down mostly because I realized how preoccupied with the the thread we had all become. I hoped in locking it, we could all take a break from it and move on to more productive things for what remained of the day. Most everyone seems to be getting along better this morning (even if dome are grinning and bearing), so maybe closing it and allowing some time for reflection wasn't a terrible thing.

Closing the thread was not personal. I did not seek to cut anyone off. I wasn't being vindictive. I wasn't trying to give anyone the last say (@Strenuus was still typing his response when I closed the thread. He had no idea I was closing it. I saw that he drew the ire of several of you and I would have spoke up sooner, but I was having family game night with the fams. Sorry Stren for putting you in thay position), I was not trying to abuse my power or anything so nefarious. My intentions and reasons were good.

There were posters who flagged some posts. As moderators we ask posters to do such when they suspect violations of the rules. Some of those flags were rejected, some were found to be correct in assertion. We take them all seriously, and while I understand your objection, we cannot advise posters to not flag posts they believe to be attacks/insults etc, just because other posters feel differently. We do prefer posters flag serious infractions, but we are glad the systrm is being used. It does help us.

I agree, I have too seen far worse threads, but I have disclosed the reasons I closed this one, like them or not. You might be surprised who some of the "complainers" are. We keep that private for obvious reasons. And, no not because we are some evil deep state cabal. As Moderators we aren't out to get anybody, we aren't trying to instil a certain political agenda on the forum, etc etc.

We have tried to be fair. Our framework is not based around politics, though we have tried to balance conservative and liberal voices on our staff.

We aren't wardens or police officers. We aren't your parents. We like to think of ourselves as fire fighters, putting out the flames before arguments get to three alarm fires.

Many here post opinions as though they are facts. If you see thrm as opinion an not fact, take it as such. Mods are posters too, just because we are also watching over threads doesn't mean we don't have a right to express our opinions too, even if you don't agree with them. Sometimes, like everyone else, those opinions get heated. We are after all humans and not robots.

I get that you are angry about a mod having the final post in the thread. (Again, he was expressing his opinion as a poster and didn't know the thread was being closed)You thought he posted and then closed it to get the last word. I understand the frustration that caused. Again, I am sorry I didn't clear matters up earlier, I was with my family.

So, your thought is mods shouldn't be invloved in heated political threads? I don't see that happening. Again, mods too have the right to express their opinions here. I get what you are saying, but if you ask us to abstain from one thread or type of thread then we would have to abstain from others. Then we might become the very thing you fear we are, some power hungry overseers.

I do see what you are saying about moderators having other moderators not involved in the heated thread mediate those threads. I will bring this up with the other mods. I had considered this when I closed the thread. I knew there would be some voicing of my having been part of the thread as bias in closing it.

I wouldn't put it past Trump to shutter the phones of those critical of him. That was not the case here. I understand you feel like you were shut out. My decision to close it had nothing to do with your and Barfos difference of opinion. Nor was it to mute you or anyone else. I have stated my reasons. I stand by them.
People need to be more like me. I'm a master debater
 
I did see some posters beginning to put aside their differences and finding common ground in the thread. But, it was also becoming a pissing contest between others.

It was often very heated. There were attacks and people going at each other personally, rather than the matter being discussed (politics, Trump, etc). I was glad to see some of you move closer to common ground.

I admit there was some productive parts of the thread, but there was also a lot of chaos. I shut it down mostly because I realized how preoccupied with the the thread we had all become. I hoped in locking it, we could all take a break from it and move on to more productive things for what remained of the day. Most everyone seems to be getting along better this morning (even if some are grinning and bearing), so maybe closing it and allowing some time for reflection wasn't a terrible thing.

Closing the thread was not personal. I did not seek to cut anyone off. I wasn't being vindictive. I wasn't trying to give anyone the last say (@Strenuus was still typing his response when I closed the thread. He had no idea I was closing it. I saw that he drew the ire of several of you and I would have spoke up sooner, but I was having game night with the fams. Sorry Stren for putting you in that position), I was not trying to abuse my power or anything so nefarious. My intentions and reasons were good.

There were posters who flagged some posts. As moderators we ask posters to do such when they suspect violations of the rules. Some of those flags were rejected, some were found to be correct in assertion. We take them all seriously, and while I understand your objection, we cannot advise posters to not flag posts they believe to be attacks/insults etc, just because other posters feel differently. We do prefer posters flag serious infractions, but we are glad the system is being used. It does help us.

I agree, I have too seen far worse threads, but I have disclosed the reasons I closed this one, like them or not. You might be surprised who some of the "complainers" are. We keep that private for obvious reasons. And, no not because we are some evil deep state cabal. As Moderators we aren't out to get anybody, we aren't trying to instil a certain political agenda on the forum, etc etc.

We have tried to be fair. Our framework is not based around politics, though we have tried to balance conservative and liberal voices on our staff.

We aren't wardens or police officers. We aren't your parents. We like to think of ourselves as fire fighters, putting out the flames before arguments get to three alarm fires.

Many here post opinions as though they are facts. If you see thrm as opinion an not fact, take it as such. Mods are posters too, just because we are also watching over threads doesn't mean we don't have a right to express our opinions too, even if you don't agree with them. Sometimes, like everyone else, those opinions get heated. We are after all humans and not robots.

I get that you are angry about a mod having the final post in the thread. (Again, he was expressing his opinion as a poster and didn't know the thread was being closed)You thought he posted and then closed it to get the last word. I understand the frustration that caused. Again, I am sorry I didn't clear matters up earlier, I was with my family.

So, your thought is mods shouldn't be invloved in heated political threads? I don't see that happening. Again, mods too have the right to express their opinions here. I get what you are saying, but if you ask us to abstain from one thread or type of thread then we would have to abstain from others. Then we might become the very thing you fear we are, some power hungry overseers.

I do see what you are saying about moderators having other moderators not involved in the heated thread mediate those threads. I will bring this up with the other mods. I had considered this when I closed the thread. I knew there would be some voicing of my having been part of the thread as bias in closing it.

I wouldn't put it past Trump to shutter the phones of those critical of him. That was not the case here. I understand you feel like you were shut out. My decision to close it had nothing to do with your and Barfo's difference of opinion. Nor was it to mute you or anyone else. I have stated my reasons. I stand by them.

That was excellent. Very well said.

Thank you.
 
I did see some posters beginning to put aside their differences and finding common ground in the thread. But, it was also becoming a pissing contest between others.

It was often very heated. There were attacks and people going at each other personally, rather than the matter being discussed (politics, Trump, etc). I was glad to see some of you move closer to common ground.

I admit there was some productive parts of the thread, but there was also a lot of chaos. I shut it down mostly because I realized how preoccupied with the the thread we had all become. I hoped in locking it, we could all take a break from it and move on to more productive things for what remained of the day. Most everyone seems to be getting along better this morning (even if some are grinning and bearing), so maybe closing it and allowing some time for reflection wasn't a terrible thing.

Closing the thread was not personal. I did not seek to cut anyone off. I wasn't being vindictive. I wasn't trying to give anyone the last say (@Strenuus was still typing his response when I closed the thread. He had no idea I was closing it. I saw that he drew the ire of several of you and I would have spoke up sooner, but I was having family game night with the fams. Sorry Stren for putting you in thay position), I was not trying to abuse my power or anything so nefarious. My intentions and reasons were good.

There were posters who flagged some posts. As moderators we ask posters to do such when they suspect violations of the rules. Some of those flags were rejected, some were found to be correct in assertion. We take them all seriously, and while I understand your objection, we cannot advise posters to not flag posts they believe to be attacks/insults etc, just because other posters feel differently. We do prefer posters flag serious infractions, but we are glad the systrm is being used. It does help us.

I agree, I have too seen far worse threads, but I have disclosed the reasons I closed this one, like them or not. You might be surprised who some of the "complainers" are. We keep that private for obvious reasons. And, no not because we are some evil deep state cabal. As Moderators we aren't out to get anybody, we aren't trying to instil a certain political agenda on the forum, etc etc.

We have tried to be fair. Our framework is not based around politics, though we have tried to balance conservative and liberal voices on our staff.

We aren't wardens or police officers. We aren't your parents. We like to think of ourselves as fire fighters, putting out the flames before arguments get to three alarm fires.

Many here post opinions as though they are facts. If you see thrm as opinion an not fact, take it as such. Mods are posters too, just because we are also watching over threads doesn't mean we don't have a right to express our opinions too, even if you don't agree with them. Sometimes, like everyone else, those opinions get heated. We are after all humans and not robots.

I get that you are angry about a mod having the final post in the thread. (Again, he was expressing his opinion as a poster and didn't know the thread was being closed)You thought he posted and then closed it to get the last word. I understand the frustration that caused. Again, I am sorry I didn't clear matters up earlier, I was with my family.

So, your thought is mods shouldn't be involved in heated political threads? I don't see that happening. Again, mods too have the right to express their opinions here. I get what you are saying, but if you ask us to abstain from one thread or type of thread then we would have to abstain from others. Then we might become the very thing you fear we are, some power hungry overseers.

I do see what you are saying about moderators having other moderators not involved in the heated thread mediate those threads. I will bring this up with the other mods. I had considered this when I closed the thread. I knew there would be some voicing of my having been part of the thread as bias in closing it.

I wouldn't put it past Trump to shutter the phones of those critical of him. That was not the case here. I understand you feel like you were shut out. My decision to close it had nothing to do with your and Barfos difference of opinion. Nor was it to mute you or anyone else. I have stated my reasons. I stand by them.

Fair enough. Just a couple things though. I never said mods shouldn't be involved in heated political threads. I said if they are, then maybe the mod part should be set aside. Looks like you got that, but wanted to clarify, as you mentioned both.

Everyone is entitled to thier opinion and voicing it. But like so many things, I think once a mod gets involved in that discussion, the mod abilities to control the thread should be handed over to other mods. Too easy for people to call foul play.

In this instance even other mods didn't know what happened. Stren posted, but then didn't respond to anything else to clarify he didn't lock the thread(very likely didn't see the complaints in the other threads). Based on how stern he has been and even in the very post he made, it is very plausible and looked like that is what had happened.

I just wish people would be a little bit more tolerant all the way around and then not near as much of this crap would exist. More tolerant of others' differing opinions(so little of that here), more tolerant of what they let bother them( sooo many flags and complaints about nothing really) ...
eh... now im rambling.


I get it now. No ones fault really. Timing was just conveniently unfortunate. Thanks for clarifying.
 
Nothing so nefarious or shadowy. There is no secret cabal here. No secret cliques. We are not the illuminati. It is actually not as prodigious or fantastical as you make it out to be, and in fact you would probably find the reality of moderating here far less alluring and far more dispiriting.

Excuse me, CC, but emails/pms I have received indicate otherwise.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top