OT Coronavirus: America in chaos, News and Updates. One million Americans dead and counting (3 Viewers)

[Lanny]

Lol. I guess you’re suggesting that’s what I’m doing. It’s funny how the people submitting to every one of the government or media’s whims just to get their lollipops back are the ones calling others chumps and Karens. The projection is real.

That's what you say but you are wrong. People take the vaccine because they can see where the data leads them and are not fools.

 

[Orion Bailey]

Oh, so the question wasn't relavent to the conversation at hand then... Gotcha.

it was relevant to the link you posted. I simply asked if they are a left leaning paper. I dont know but thats what I've been told. I don't read it. So i asked. I used to live in ny but never read it. I was curious…
Wtf….

Answer the question or don't. But it was a yes or no question.

 

[Orion Bailey]

No, actually not. Not even close.

Not that the virus cares about red and blue anyway.

barfo

Then can you please explain this?

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/new-york-times

 

[Orion Bailey]

Oh, so the question wasn't relavent to the conversation at hand then... Gotcha.

its also relevant because anytime a conservative posts a link, the link is scrutinized and deemed worthy or right wing conspiracy. Are we not allowed the same scrutiny of liberals and others when posting a link???

or is scrutiny only allowed from one side???
Unreal….

 

[Phatguysrule]

its also relevant because anytime a conservative posts a link, the link is scrutinized and deemed worthy or right wing conspiracy. Are we not allowed the same scrutiny of liberals and others when posting a link???

or is scrutiny only allowed from one side???
Unreal….

I asked if you'd like to address the validity of the quotes. That's inviting scrutiny.

You declined.

You have now shifted the conversation away from the original topic in an attempt to start an off topic political argument.

I don't care about blue or red. I care about accuracy. If you have any evidence that the links or source of those links are questionable please feel free to share it.

If a person posts opinions from biased and inaccurate sources I generally post evidence in support.

If conservatives would stop doing that so much they would not be called out on it as much.

 

[Orion Bailey]

I asked if you'd like to address the validity of the quotes. That's inviting scrutiny.

You declined.

You have now shifted the conversation away from the original topic in an attempt to start an off topic political argument.

I don't care about blue or red. I care about accuracy. If you have any evidence that the links or source of those links are questionable please feel free to share it.

If a person posts opinions from biased and inaccurate sources I generally post evidence in support.

If conservatives would stop doing that so much they would not be called out on it as much.

So you cant answer the yes or no question. Got it.
At least Barfo tried.
but keep on ranting…
if “liberals” didn’t do this so much maybe an actual conversation between differing political ideals can actually take place…

You answered a question with a question. If you want your question answered, try answering mine first.
Conversation101…..

 

[Orion Bailey]

I asked if you'd like to address the validity of the quotes. That's inviting scrutiny.

You declined.

You have now shifted the conversation away from the original topic in an attempt to start an off topic political argument.

I don't care about blue or red. I care about accuracy. If you have any evidence that the links or source of those links are questionable please feel free to share it.

If a person posts opinions from biased and inaccurate sources I generally post evidence in support.

If conservatives would stop doing that so much they would not be called out on it as much.

ill take it a step further even in your claim of me shifting the conversation at hand. You were discussing with hailblazers. Not me. So i didn't shift any conversation. I simply butted in and ask about the link you provided.
Your inability to just answer the question without twisting and ranting is contradicting your assertion regarding conservatives conversational shortcomings
Look in the mirror just once….

 

[jonnyboy]

That's what you say but you are wrong. People take the vaccine because they can see where the data leads them and are not fools.

But the data doesn’t lead to that in regards to children. Not in any way.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[Phatguysrule]

ill take it a step further even in your claim of me shifting the conversation at hand. You were discussing with hailblazers. Not me. So i didn't shift any conversation. I simply butted in and ask about the link you provided.
Your inability to just answer the question without twisting and ranting is contradicting your assertion regarding conservatives conversational shortcomings
Look in the mirror just once….

Again, you're trying to move the conversation to an unrelated topic which I'm not interested in discussing. I've asked you to provide any evidence that the statements you took issue with were untrue or misquoted and you've been unable to do so.

Thanks for proving that there is no reason to doubt or question the quotes.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

King's Evil!

 

[Orion Bailey]

Again, you're trying to move the conversation to an unrelated topic which I'm not interested in discussing. I've asked you to provide any evidence that the statements you took issue with were untrue or misquoted and you've been unable to do so.

Thanks for proving that there is no reason to doubt or question the quotes.

then just say you arent interested in discussing and move on…

And i didn't prove shit… but then proof and facts and opinions all blend together for some…

I asked you a question first. You answered a question with a question.
Then get on me about not answering your question? you are smart enough to know how hypocritical that is….

Smh….

 

[Phatguysrule]

So you cant answer the yes or no question. Got it.
At least Barfo tried.
but keep on ranting…
if “liberals” didn’t do this so much maybe an actual conversation between differing political ideals can actually take place…

You answered a question with a question. If you want your question answered, try answering mine first.
Conversation101…..

I don't care about liberal/conservative tribal bullshit.

It is counterproductive diatribe employed by sheep on both sides.

I care about provable data and facts.

Get out of here with that bullshit. I have no patience for it.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Girls... girls... you're both pretty... grumpy this early in the morning. Fuck, I haven't even had coffee yet.

 

[Orion Bailey]

I don't care about liberal/conservative tribal bullshit.

It is counterproductive diatribe employed by sheep on both sides.

I care about provable data and facts.

Get out of here with that bullshit. I have no patience for it.

but yet you remain silent when right wing “propaganda”links are called out as bs…

got it. So you only care when it fits your narrative. If it doesn't you dismiss it. Got it.

 

[Phatguysrule]

then just say you arent interested in discussing and move on…

Smh….

I did. Multiple times. But you just want to argue about stupid tribal bullshit...

 

[Phatguysrule]

but yet you remain silent when right wing “propaganda”links are called out as bs…

got it. So you only care when it fits your narrative. If it doesn't you dismiss it. Got it.

Well, my narrative is provable facts and evidence...

So yeah, when lies, disinformation, misinformation, and other bullshit are called out I appreciate it.

Thats correct.

 

[BLAZINGGIANTS]

Girls... girls... you're both pretty... grumpy this early in the morning. Fuck, I haven't even had coffee yet.

But Sly, sly… a dog with no balls… who is the prettiest girl of them alls?

 

[Orion Bailey]

I did. Multiple times. But you just want to argue about stupid tribal bullshit...

bullshit. You answered a question with a question. You didn't say your not interested in answering my question.

i understand your complete inability to ever concede anything.

smh even more now…

 

[Orion Bailey]

Well, my narrative is provable facts and evidence...

So yeah, when lies, disinformation, misinformation, and other bullshit are called out I appreciate it.

Thats correct.

blah blah blah…

 

[Phatguysrule]

But the data doesn’t lead to that in regards to children. Not in any way.

Source?

 

[Orion Bailey]

Girls... girls... you're both pretty... grumpy this early in the morning. Fuck, I haven't even had coffee yet.

not grumpy at all dog.
Just not tolerating hypocritical behavior.
You know this….its why you had no answer to my post to you the other day, calling out Johnny for doing the same thing many others do here on a regular, that you seem to be perfectly fine with not calling out…

all good though. Busy day today. And the Blazers won last night!

So dont misperceive intolerance of hypocrisy for grumpiness!

 

[Phatguysrule]

bullshit. You answered a question with a question. You didn't say your not interested in answering my question.

i understand your complete inability to ever concede anything.

smh even more now…

The question was trying to determine what you were asking. Once it became obvious you were just trolling political BS it was no longer worth answering the bullshit question.

Better off to just call you out for the BS.

If conservatives are being called out at higher rates for posting bullshit they should probably stop posting bullshit.

What I posted was not bullshit, it was entirely and provably accurate, even just based on your inability to prove any of it wrong.

So now that you have stepped all over your dick and made yourself look like an ass you'll resort to childish taunting.

Pitiful, but typical.

 

[Phatguysrule]

blah blah blah…

 

[julius]

Planet?

 

[Orion Bailey]

Again, you're trying to move the conversation to an unrelated topic which I'm not interested in discussing. I've asked you to provide any evidence that the statements you took issue with were untrue or misquoted and you've been unable to do so.

Thanks for proving that there is no reason to doubt or question the quotes.

I don't care about liberal/conservative tribal bullshit.

It is counterproductive diatribe employed by sheep on both sides.

I care about provable data and facts.

Get out of here with that bullshit. I have no patience for it.

so by this logic since you refused to answer my INNITIAL question, you just proved the nytimes is left wing propaganda.

Im also not interested in right or left. Im interested in making sure that when trying to discuss, people are actually being honest and impartial. If you are not willing to admit certain things because “you aren't interested” then that shows having a full, up aNd up, honest discussion is futile…

and you provided me more insight to my opinion of this today.

Thanks.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Planet?

Planet is likely a shorthand for “planet-struck.” Many medical practitioners believed the planets influenced health and sanity. A person who was planet-stricken had been suddenly maligned by the forces of particular planets. They would likely present symptoms also associated with aneurysms, strokes, and heart attacks.​

 

[Orion Bailey]

The question was trying to determine what you were asking.

bullshit.
It was a clear black and white question.
Barfo answered and i responded Nd have left it at that.
i want to know who is actually being honest with people around here and ill ask any question i feel necessary to determine it. I dont give shit if it doesn't interest you or meet your conversational standards.


So keep going with your long crybaby rants because you cant admit you couldnt answer the question for fear of being called out( because you know you have called out right wing links).
Notice how when Barfo clarified his intentions as being up and up i apologized?

Thats what mean do… admit they were wrong when they are wrong.
You couldn't just answer the question, and never said you weren't interested. But then say you said so several times.

just admit you shouldn't have ranted and just said you weren't interested in answering the question.
Its what honest people worth conversing with do… in my opinion.

heres one for you… i was wrong in even asking the question, because i should know by now i would not get an honest, impartial answer without a bunch of twisting, sidestepping and lecturing..

so my fault. I apologize…

 

[Phatguysrule]

so by this logic since you refused to answer my INNITIAL question, you just proved the nytimes is left wing propaganda.

Im also not interested in right or left. Im interested in making sure that when trying to discuss, people are actually being honest and impartial. If you are not willing to admit certain things because “you aren't interested” then that shows having a full, up aNd up, honest discussion is futile…

and you provided me more insight to my opinion of this today.

Thanks.

Again, I don't care if it's left wing propaganda, as long as that quote is correct.

If it's not correct I'll be happy to correct it or remove it.

Everything else you just said is bullshit. You don't care about being honest or impartial or you'd care more about provable data and facts. The scientific method.

If you were actually being honest and impartial you would not have called into question an apparently legitimate quote without supporting citation.

That's decidedly dishonest and impartial.

So I guess we can add hypocritical to the list...

 

[Phatguysrule]

bullshit.
It was a clear black and white question.
Barfo answered and i responded Nd have left it at that.
i want to know who is actually being honest with people around here and ill ask any question i feel necessary to determine it. I dont give shit if it doesn't interest you or meet your conversational standards.


So keep going with your long crybaby rants because you cant admit you couldnt answer the question for fear of being called out( because you know you have called out right wing links).
Notice how when Barfo clarified his intentions as being up and up i apologized?

Thats what mean do… admit they were wrong when they are wrong.
You couldn't just answer the question, and never said you weren't interested. But then say you said so several times.

just admit you shouldn't have ranted and just said you weren't interested in answering the question.
Its what honest people worth conversing with do… in my opinion.

heres one for you… i was wrong in even asking the question, because i should know by now i would not get an honest, impartial answer without a bunch of twisting, sidestepping and lecturing..

so my fault. I apologize…

Yes, you were wrong to ask the question with the intention of derailing the conversation. Agreed.