OT Coronavirus: America in chaos, News and Updates. One million Americans dead and counting (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Users who are viewing this thread

In epidemics anectodal evidence is more harmful than it is helpful.

Are you advocating the silencing of the truth and facts????

How is a fact harmful? What i stated was a fact.
Are you implying i should not tell anyone because it will be harmful?… to what exactly?
 
Are you advocating the silencing of the truth and facts????

How is a fact harmful? What i stated was a fact.
Are you implying i should not tell anyone because it will be harmful?… to what exactly?
I said exactly what I meant to say. Using anecdotal evidence is more harmful than it is helpful.

You are free to do it and I'm free to call you out for engaging in illogical and harmful behavior.

Freedom of speech works both ways. You're not a victim just because somebody else has the same rights as you.
 
Are you advocating the silencing of the truth and facts????

How is a fact harmful? What i stated was a fact.
Are you implying i should not tell anyone because it will be harmful?… to what exactly?
Facts are that really small occurrences mean nothing when looking at a population of large numbers. This means anecdotal stories are interesting but they say nothing about what is going on in general. I too enjoy telling anecdotal stories but I implore the reader to disregard them because they have no scientific value.
 
Are you advocating the silencing of the truth and facts????

How is a fact harmful? What i stated was a fact.
Are you implying i should not tell anyone because it will be harmful?… to what exactly?

Only the state approved narrative is allowed.
 
I said exactly what I meant to say. Using anecdotal evidence is more harmful than it is helpful.

You are free to do it and I'm free to call you out for engaging in illogical and harmful behavior.

Freedom of speech works both ways. You're not a victim just because somebody else has the same rights as you.

wtf are you even talking about? Victim?

lmfao…

wtf ever. No one is claiming victim. I just think you acknowledge facts only when it suits your narrative and you just proved it.
Only one a ting like a victim now is you. Lol.
The only thing illogical is you! Lol.

ill state facts whenever the fuck i please. I dont give a flying f a out your opinion of what is logical when its a fact. You lost that cred with me long ago. Lol.

i don't give a shit if you refute the facts as harmful. I just found it soo hilarious i asked you some questions.

But when you give others shit for not sticking to the facts, but then say this, you lose all cred….

victim….

some funny shit right there.

its only a helpful fact if mr. all knowing and never wrong, approves of it.

lmfao. Gtfo with that bullshit…
 
Facts are that really small occurrences mean nothing when looking at a population of large numbers. This means anecdotal stories are interesting but they say nothing about what is going on in general. I too enjoy telling anecdotal stories but I implore the reader to disregard them because they have no scientific value.

and i stated it was a fact and i wasnt choosing sides.. the equivalent of saying don't let this fact allow you to choose a side…

but mr moral authority is claiming im being harmful… just tooo funny.
 
Only the state approved narrative is allowed.

shit. Dont have to look past all those all knowing S2 members that are never wrong and preach and preach and preach until they talk themselves in a double standard corner. And then they will claim you are playing victim! Deflection, sothey don’t have to address their hypocritical stance.


Lmfao.
 
wtf are you even talking about? Victim?

lmfao…

wtf ever. No one is claiming victim. I just think you acknowledge facts only when it suits your narrative and you just proved it.
Only one a ting like a victim now is you. Lol.
The only thing illogical is you! Lol.

ill state facts whenever the fuck i please. I dont give a flying f a out your opinion of what is logical when its a fact. You lost that cred with me long ago. Lol.

i don't give a shit if you refute the facts as harmful. I just found it soo hilarious i asked you some questions.

But when you give others shit for not sticking to the facts, but then say this, you lose all cred….

victim….

some funny shit right there.

its only a helpful fact if mr. all knowing and never wrong, approves of it.

lmfao. Gtfo with that bullshit…
State whatever you like. When anecdotal evidence is used I'll call it out for the illogical BS it is. No worries brother!
 
Only the state approved narrative is allowed.
Incredibly false.
Just because a state narrative is very often correct doesn't mean that just the fact that it's a state narrative makes it somehow automatically true. It just means that our state reasoning is usually more careful with their deductive reasoning leading to their conclusions than your reasoning leading to your conclusions. At least that's my guess.
 
State whatever you like. When anecdotal evidence is used I'll call it out for the illogical BS it is. No worries brother!

I stated a fact. I also said im not choosing sides.
The only illogical bs response is you trying to make more of it than it is.
But then thats all you really do here is try to get everyone to think like you or they are wrong…


Here is another fact for you. No one else is going to think just like you. Because were not robots!
Id learn to accept that a bit more rather than trying day in and day out to correct people to think like you on some message board. Its not having the affect, i think you think it is…

Maybe the person i told that to liked what i had to say? Who are you to deny them that factual info? By your standards i harmed someone.
Lol

But you know. You aRe the self Appointed moral authority around here…

Lol
 
Incredibly false.
Just because a state narrative is very often correct doesn't mean that just the fact that it's a state narrative makes it somehow automatically true. It just means that our state reasoning is usually more careful with their deductive reasoning leading to their conclusions than your reasoning leading to your conclusions. At least that's my guess.

um Lanny you are preaching to the choir here. Its not el prez who thinks that, its most others here. You missed the green font. :)
 
um Lanny you are preaching to the choir here. Its not el prez who thinks that, its most others here. You missed the green font. :)
There is no green font in the post of EL PRESIDENTE that I received.
 
I stated a fact. I also said im not choosing sides.
The only illogical bs response is you trying to make more of it than it is.
But then thats all you really do here is try to get everyone to think like you or they are wrong…


Here is another fact for you. No one else is going to think just like you. Because were not robots!
Id learn to accept that a bit more rather than trying day in and day out to correct people to think like you on some message board. Its not having the affect, i think you think it is…

Maybe the person i told that to liked what i had to say? Who are you to deny them that factual info? By your standards i harmed someone.
Lol

But you know. You aRe the self Appointed moral authority around here…

Lol
I couldn't care less about any of the gobbledygook you just posted. I posted that anecdotal is not reliable in response to anecdotal evidence.

The only fact that matters I here is that anecdotal evidence is not reliable.

People can make their own opinions about that statement. Regardless of you having problems with that fact, or me stating that fact.

You don't get to prevent me from stating that, as much as you would obviously like to do so.
 
Only the state approved narrative is allowed.
Who said anything was disallowed? Looks like the post is still there.

Are you restricted from seeing it? Perhaps the OP has you on ignore so you can't read it?

I'm not sure how that works.
 
Who said anything was disallowed? Looks like the post is still there.

Are you restricted from seeing it? Perhaps the OP has you on ignore so you can't read it?

I'm not sure how that works.

You. With every post. No you aren't forcibly stopping anyone.
But lets not be obtuse here….
 
I couldn't care less about any of the gobbledygook you just posted. I posted that anecdotal is not reliable in response to anecdotal evidence.

The only fact that matters I here is that anecdotal evidence is not reliable.

People can make their own opinions about that statement. Regardless of you having problems with that fact, or me stating that fact.

You don't get to prevent me from stating that, as much as you would obviously like to do so.

are you so out of answers your now going to use what i said to you as a response to me?
Its you who wants to silence me. You are the one who took issue woth it.

i mean really. This is spinning down the toilet bowl of hypocritical excuses….


Just like you said. People can make their own opinions but here you are railing on me for stating facts that hurt people. Who? The ones with free will to make up their own opinions?


You dont really have a clue how hypocritical this is.. its obvious


Carry on mister always right never wrong….
 
are you so out of answers your now going to use what i said to you as a response to me?
Its you who wants to silence me. You are the one who took issue woth it.

i mean really. This is spinning down the toilet bowl of hypocritical excuses….


Just like you said. People can make their own opinions but here you are railing on me for stating facts that hurt people. Who? The ones with free will to make up their own opinions?


You dont really have a clue how hypocritical this is.. its obvious


Carry on mister always right never wrong….
Again. You saying I want something doesn't make it true.

I stated a fact. That's allowed.
 
Looks like it's running through my office too, 3 of 13 coworkers have tested positive so far but everyone is apparently having trouble finding a test. Been a fun Monday between that and the snow. What a clusterfuck. I tested negative at least.
 
My better half works 2 days a week from the office. She drove to the office and found out that the CEO decided for 2 weeks of work from home just to be sure no-one needs to be exposed after the holidays - smart decision, methinks.
 
Again. You saying I want something doesn't make it true.

I stated a fact. That's allowed.

no. You stated an opinion. Its your opinion it was illogical bs.

I stated factual happenings. You stated your opinion if my post.

thats a fact. Get your facts straight…
 
I'm sorry you didn't have a merry Christmas.

No you arent. Are you a habitual liar? Or just always say what you think the other person wants to hear are you S2’s own google bot?

and i had a wonderful xmas for once!!! Didnt have to travel for once!!!
 
Back
Top