Eastoff
But it was a beginning.
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2009
- Messages
- 16,100
- Likes
- 4,105
- Points
- 113
http://www.newseveryday.com/article...eveal-how-our-ancestors-evolved-onto-land.htm
Isn't Creationism majestic?
Isn't Creationism majestic?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes God is good
define good. skilled? beneficial? well-behaved?
http://www.newseveryday.com/article...eveal-how-our-ancestors-evolved-onto-land.htm
Isn't Creationism majestic?
Your intuition must be much more active than mine. Since the article did not mention creation and nothing in it cause me to think of it, but then, somehow you did.
It's "its finest."
Just sayin'...
Yes, I know the difference, but I was too excited to post. I did not think it through.
omnibenevolent
define benevolent without using the word good...
I always wonder what theists mean by God is good. It's such a vague, anthropecentric thing to say.
define benevolent without using the word good...
I always wonder what theists mean by God is good. It's such a vague, anthropecentric thing to say.
That's like trying to describe green without the color green.
Easy.
a color whose hue is somewhat less yellow than that of growing fresh grass or of the emerald or is that of the part of the spectrum lying between blue and yellow.
No where did that say the word "green".
That's like trying to describe green without the color green.
God being omnibenevolent is full of love, pure morality, true grace. I guess I summarized it enough.
Easy.
a color whose hue is somewhat less yellow than that of growing fresh grass or of the emerald or is that of the part of the spectrum lying between blue and yellow.
No where did that say the word "green".
Green is not vague. It's a word we use for the specific visual sensation humans experience when they observe a certain wavelength of light.
"Good" without any qualifiers on the other hand is just vague. And when it's defined with any precision it seems to become a highly anthropocentric concept.
Love, morality, grace are all also extremely vague concepts, defined differently by different people.
My theory is that when most Christians or other theists say "God is good" they are subconsciously actually referring to their feelings in some sense, rather than mentally formulating a specific meaning of the phrase or specific definition of good. Your analogy suggesting you mean something you can't begin to describe would support this. No offense or anything, I'm just fascinated by psychological non-cognitive language stuff.
Love is hardly a vague concept. Just as Julius used some technical description of green. Because if you believe love is vague, then you don't believe in it
I don't believe love as it refers to the human emotion is vague.
However when you say "God is full of love" or whatever, that's getting into extremely vague territory. Are you saying God experiences emotions similar to humans?
