riverman
Writing Team
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2013
- Messages
- 68,619
- Likes
- 67,940
- Points
- 113
Apparently Neil Olshey agrees with meDelusions..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Apparently Neil Olshey agrees with meDelusions..
I liked what I saw from Frazier last night and think he will be acceptable as a 3rd string PG. If Dame/CJ has fouls or an injury we will need someone in that spot. Or if we play an unusual opponent that starts trapping us. There is zero chance we cut both Frazier and Pressey. I do think Alexander makes the team.
I believe all of Frazier/Pressey/Alexander/Montero have about $100k guaranteed but the bulk of their contracts can be cut and not paid.
More and more, I'm getting the feeling that both Montero and Pressey will get cut (in addition to Johnson).
Think we go into the season with a roster spot open.
Can you help me understand how the open roster spot benefits us? Would we not be able to cut the 15th man at any given time if the open spot were needed? Would Montero's presence in practices somehow be a detriment to the rest of the team as a whole? Do you think Olshey would somehow be less willing to entertain other roster possibilities if that spot were filled by a minimum salary guy rather than unmanned?
Hey, don't you understand how this forum works? Even when you're wrong, you're supposed to hold to that point TO THE DEATH! How else can a true flame war commence?Good point. I stand corrected.
The cut can always be made at the last minute and the flexibility offered by opening a spot now would be minimal.
Can you help me understand how the open roster spot benefits us? Would we not be able to cut the 15th man at any given time if the open spot were needed? Would Montero's presence in practices somehow be a detriment to the rest of the team as a whole? Do you think Olshey would somehow be less willing to entertain other roster possibilities if that spot were filled by a minimum salary guy rather than unmanned?
Hey, don't you understand how this forum works? Even when you're wrong, you're supposed to hold to that point TO THE DEATH! How else can a true flame war commence?
Damn you and your reasonable response.

Maybe.If we keep a 15th man he has to be paid; so by cutting him we save the salary. Montero would take time from the coaches, teammates and staff so it might be better to cut him and focus the basketball development resources on the other 14 players.
Frazier & Pressey are both non guaranteed. Alexander & Montero both have $100K guaranteed.
From what I've seen of Frazier and Pressey, both bring about the same to the table. As a 3rd string point guard, I don't think either will have any future or current impact to the team. However, Alexander and Montero both have the potential to be impact players in a few years. No reason not to take a look at them this year and see how they progress. Both Alexander and Montero have non guaranteed salaries for next year., so if they don't pan out, they're easy to let go.
But we don't save salary... we're so far under the minimum salary that the money is going to be spent. Why not spend it on a project player with potential?
If there's any realistic chance Montero developed to a competent NBA player in 3 years sure keep him. If it's a 1000-1 long shot then it's not worth the effort; better to cut the guy. I trust Neil and Stotts to make the right choice.
What does it hurt though? Give the kid a year in an NBA culture. See if he gleans anything off of it. If they don't see anything within that year, let him go. It's the 15th spot on a roster of young guys. If freakin Jack Haley can stick around and sit on NBA benches for 10ish years, I think we can hold onto Montero for one year.
(also, I had no idea that Jack Haley had died this year...... wow)
There will be other teams players cut, D league prospects, and there are organizational resources needed for every rostered player. Luis had to prove he's worthy of those opportunity costs. The costs may be very minor but if there's no realistic chance of Luis developing the team should go in a different direction.
The full amount of the contracts of Frazier, Montero, and Alexander don't become guaranteed until Jan 10, 2016. Up until that point they can be cut and the cap hit is the prorated amount.
When I look at those deals, I think Alexander is safe.As I noted in the CAP thread -
