While I don't disagree in theory, the hard part is actually finding that haul. It's not as simple as you suggest.
This is the big hang up to me, on top of not wanting that direction anyways. It seems the full tank rebuild suggests a haul for Dame, and getting good pieces for Nurk and Ant, but then when we want to move Ant and Nurk for pieces that could help Dame, they all of a sudden to a lot here have no value so we couldn't move them to help Dame?
And where is the big haul for Dame? I think it's already been looked at elsewhere, but we have like 8 trades all on the same fucking subject, so I dunno if it is in here, or if it is in my imagination, but others should try to find that Dame HAUL.
Milwaukee: Sure they'd love him. No great assets.
Boston: Would Brown stick around here? I like him WITH Dame. I question his personality as a young vet on a rebuild. And he's from Atlanta. Would he sign long term in the PNW? What happens when you move Dame, and the asset you got walks in a year?\
Philadelphia: Maxey about the only asset, and difficulty with future picks, I believe.
Cleveland: Unlikely
NY: They just signed Brunson, so would be a clunky fit
Brooklyn: Don't see it
Miami: Sure. But they owe a 2025 1st. So can get pick #20, and nothing until 2027. Maybe Herro gets us additional assets, but if Ant can't get any, why would Herro?
Atlanta: Doubtful
Toronto:
Chicago: No real assets
Indy: Doubtful
Washington:
Orlando:
Charlotte: Doubtful
Detroit: Doubtful
Denver:
Memphis: No
Sacramento: Doubtful
PHX: No real assets
Clippers: No assets
GS: No
Lakers: no assets
Minnesota: No real assets
New Orleans:
OKC: Doubtful
Dallas: No real assets
Utah: Seems unlikely
Houston: Doubtful. Maybe if they signed Harden, but seems unlikely.
SA: Doubtful
I'm sure a few of these are arguable. I get that. But for discussions sake, left us with Orlando, Washington, Toronto, Denver and New Orleans.
Out of these, I doubt Orlando would actually go all in with that young of a roster. Denver sends us guys like Murray and MPJ. So we get...younger. But it's not the young prospects or haul people would want. And do you want to be saddled with MPJ's injury risks? Toronto I suppose could send us Barnes and a late lotto/early non lotto this year, and then a pick 3 years from now.
I'm all for different options. If someone wants to show me where the Gobert package comes in, please let me know. It's easy to say...trade him for a HAUL. It's more difficult to pinpoint who'd give that HAUL. And yes, it isn't our job to e a GM, so the lame ass cop out of, that's Joe's job to find that haul doesn't fly with me. You can't play arm chair GM of what SHOULD be done, but then refuse to acknowledge how it COULD be done. So is it more likely we get some amazing rebuilding package for Dame that launches us in to contending status in a half decade? Or that we can move pieces and assets we have to get to contending status in that same rough time period? The likelihood is any pick haul, as doubtful as it seems, would be picks 4-6 years out, which gives us someone 2-3 years away from helping, which maybe says 8 years from now, we might really have something!!