Dame makes impassioned plea to keep (?) Ed Davis?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I am afraid that if Ed hears he is compared to the HCP he will request a meeting with PA and ask for a trade.
 
:redgrin: Part of your (new) duties ?
Not "duty" per se, but yes, basically. I think with something as innocuous as these, I'll probably prefer to give people opportunity to self-edit, or give the subject (@HCP in this case) the opportunity to say, "Nah, it's all good, leave it alone". But absent either of those, I'll probably have to edit them--even though I really don't have an issue with them--just for consistency's sake.
 
I think, technically, I'm probably supposed to edit those...
I'm sure they meant to say his POSTS are a shitty/ugly big man. Or maybe that his posts are SlyPokerDog.
 
Last edited:
Not "duty" per se, but yes, basically. I think with something as innocuous as these, I'll probably prefer to give people opportunity to self-edit, or give the subject (@HCP in this case) the opportunity to say, "Nah, it's all good, leave it alone". But absent either of those, I'll probably have to edit them--even though I really don't have an issue with them--just for consistency's sake.

Seriously? You think HCP cant handle us taking jabs at him? He expects it! He enjoys it! FAMS!
 
Seriously? You think HCP cant handle us taking jabs at him? He expects it! He enjoys it! FAMS!
I know @HCP's skin is probably the thickest of anyone on the forum. I wouldn't think he would have any issue with anything that anyone in here said about him personally (unless someone tried to claim he was from the 'burbs, or wore New Balance shoes), since he considers us all to be beneath him anyway. But other members would take offense at being the subject of the same posts, and they would have a right to because they do technically violate the PI rule. So I was just saying that if applying the rules consistently, those qualify as posts that should be edited.

Does that make sense?
 
Holy cow, Dviss, you might be on to something...

Vanilla Bean:....Dark Brown
Vanilla-Beans-Closeup-iStock-copy-1024x682.jpg


Vanilla Extract: Dark Adonal Foyle

0005210001459_500X500.jpg


Vanilla Ice Cream....whiter than an albino Irish lass...

vanilla.jpg


?@!??!

Damn white folks even trying to appropriate chocolate!

826429.jpg


24pc-white-chocolate-gift-box~~190442-1


BNM
 
I know @HCP's skin is probably the thickest of anyone on the forum. I wouldn't think he would have any issue with anything that anyone in here said about him personally (unless someone tried to claim he was from the 'burbs, or wore New Balance shoes), since he considers us all to be beneath him anyway. But other members would take offense at being the subject of the same posts, and they would have a right to because they do technically violate the PI rule. So I was just saying that if applying the rules consistently, those qualify as posts that should be edited.

Does that make sense?

I would leave it be unless it's clear that there is malicious intent. There should be room for good natured ribbing, IMO, even if it looks like insults.

Get with it, rookie!
-- HCP
 
I think, technically, I'm probably supposed to edit those...

Just to be clear, I meant my criticism of the HCP in a basketball context. I’m pretty sure that in comparison to Ed Davis, the HCP, and everyone else on this board, would be considered a shitty big man.
 
Just to be clear, I meant my criticism of the HCP in a basketball context. I’m pretty sure that in comparison to Ed Davis, the HCP, and everyone else on this board, would be considered a shitty big man.
Well then, that makes perfect sense. Although I bet that with his low center of gravity, HCP would be able to back Ed down in the post.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top