e_blazer
Rip City Fan
- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 24,279
- Likes
- 30,493
- Points
- 113
Okay, so David Aldridge is one of the best NBA writers around and he usually seems pretty in touch with the Blazers, but man he pulls some Blazer bloopers in his latest piece on nba.com:
http://www.nba.com/2011/news/featur...ade-deadline-recap/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpt1
So, Charlotte is a loser for making the trade with the Blazers, but the Blazers apparently don't exist because they aren't listed at all in the piece. Well, except later where he comments:
Hunh. I could have sworn the Blazers played the Lakers on Wednesday, then had an inspiring win over the Nuggets on Friday before yesterday's debacle with the Hawks. I know we're barely a blip on the NBA radar out here in our little Northwest outpost, but you'd think they'd at least get the facts right.
Okay, so at the bottom of the article he does say this about the trade:
So I guess we're winners...kind of.
http://www.nba.com/2011/news/featur...ade-deadline-recap/index.html?ls=iref:nbahpt1
So, Charlotte is a loser for making the trade with the Blazers, but the Blazers apparently don't exist because they aren't listed at all in the piece. Well, except later where he comments:
Blazers blow big lead over Lakers Friday, look hungover in bad loss to the Hawks Sunday.
Hunh. I could have sworn the Blazers played the Lakers on Wednesday, then had an inspiring win over the Nuggets on Friday before yesterday's debacle with the Hawks. I know we're barely a blip on the NBA radar out here in our little Northwest outpost, but you'd think they'd at least get the facts right.
Okay, so at the bottom of the article he does say this about the trade:
Gerald Wallace wasn't the most noteworthy pickup before the trade deadline, but he might be one of the most important. That was a really good deal for the Blazers.
So I guess we're winners...kind of.
Last edited:
