I voted yes because it’s the only rational answer, but we are going to get killed at the rim and on the perimeter with Dame and Simons on the floor. Scheme will be everything
it may not be applicable, but in 2017-18, with Dame and CJ on the floor, Portland was 8th in the NBA in defense. That season, Portland was 16th in opponent 3ptFG% and they were actually 1st in opponent FG% at the rim. Obviously, that was a different team, but Nurkic was the anchor of that defense in the paint. Now, Portland had Ed Davis and he was a very underrated paint defender. That was a significant factor.
on the interior, Blazers were Nurkic-Davis-Aminu-Zach (
played less than 16 minutes); now they have Nurkic-Eubanks-Grant-Winslow-Watford. Yeah the 17-18 team was better, but not to any kind of extreme. I was hoping that the Blazers would add a minimum salary big better at defense than Eubanks, but oh well
to offset the Dame/CJ pairing on the perimeter defense, Portland had Napier-Harkless-Turner-Aminu-Connaughton-Layman. To offset the Dame/Ant pairing on perimeter defense, the Blazers will have Payton-Hart-Winslow-Little-Grant-Sharpe-Johnson. I'd actually give the edge to next season's perimeter defense, especially if Ant improves on that end of the floor
so, on paper, next season's team will be weaker in the paint but better on the perimeter. But as you say, scheme and execution will be critical.