Politics Democrats distance themselves from Hillary Clinton’s ‘backward’ claim

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Sure, the Enquirer is accused of being pro Trump, but that doesn't change the caliber of what they write about and publish. Quite similar to what I've seen on CNN the past year, and more recently on MSNBC (which isn't quite as bad as CNN).

I quoted the article I linked above.


Would it be too much trouble to copy and paste it? The quote I'm speaking about had no link attached.
 
Who's Hillary Clinton? I think about this about as much as I think about Gerald Ford...both are history ...be here now I say! Anybody with a fuckin' twitter account can have 5 minutes of fame these days....Hillary would be wise to duck out of the public conversation period....dead horse...

The problem with this is

1) the whole Russia, Russia, Russia hoax was started by her campaign
2) after she lost, her staff continued to push the hoax, and do to this day
3) people working in government further pushed it, thinking she was a slam dunk to win
4) she wrote a book and did a tour where she got lots of publicity and pushed the hoax even more
5) she made similar speeches in the past couple of days that are in the news
6) her sycophants continue to push the hoax narrative

She has no intention of ducking out of the public conversation.

If you see smoke, you want to find the source of the fire (to put it out). She's the fire, in that analogy.
 
Would it be too much trouble to copy and paste it? The quote I'm speaking about had no link attached.

Here you go. Click on the link if you don't think I accurately cited the article.

Only somewhat related, but interesting nonetheless.

McCabe found to be in violation of government rules by the inspector general. Was going to take his vacation days until he was eligible for pension.

Now he's going to be fired so he won't get his pension.

Brutal.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-14/andrew-mccabe-be-fired-days-ahead-retirement-nyt

Andrew McCabe To Be Fired Days Ahead Of Retirement: NYT
 
The problem with this is

1) the whole Russia, Russia, Russia hoax was started by her campaign
2) after she lost, her staff continued to push the hoax, and do to this day
3) people working in government further pushed it, thinking she was a slam dunk to win
4) she wrote a book and did a tour where she got lots of publicity and pushed the hoax even more
5) she made similar speeches in the past couple of days that are in the news
6) her sycophants continue to push the hoax narrative

She has no intention of ducking out of the public conversation.

If you see smoke, you want to find the source of the fire (to put it out). She's the fire, in that analogy.

Do those 'sycophants' include all 17 of our most salient investigative agencies? Of course they do. If you had attended our Wednesday night meeting you would have learned that.
 
And people loyal to her still working in government.

what are you imagining "loyalty" to mean here? like they are working behind the scenes to discredit Trump simply to gain her approval? because they want her to repay them in some way? what does this "loyalty to her" boil down to at this point?
 
I wish she would just go away and stop hurting the Democratic party. That's all she does.
 
Wait, wait, wait. I got this.

Clinton - 'No I never said that, you're reading alternative facts. You should do your research on my record. Due to being too young to know of it, don't believe what others say. Research it.'

This is why I wrote in a candidate. Trump and Clinton weren't worth my vote.
Are you referring to her straight up lies about being a leading progressive that's never changed her mind?
 
Here you go. Click on the link if you don't think I accurately cited the article.

That appears to be a story based on a Fox News Report. Don't you have something credible?
 
Here's the View talking about it, and posting the video of Hillary actually saying it... :dunno:

The View, LOL. I wouldn't watch that trash if it was the last news source on Earth, no matter what the video shows.

There must be a reason you can't find it on a credible source. Perhaps it's a context issue.
 
Dems have not only wasted over a year denying their faults and ignoring voters, they've weakened their remaining base by refusing to denounce the racists, communists, and utter morons who still run what's left of the DNC.

While an illiterate, corrupt racist like Maxine Waters or a senile geriatric Nancy Pelosi still have fans in their nutty California districts, most Dems elsewhere cringe every time these fools are given a mic. The party's undeniable ties to and support for Mad-dog Louis Farrakhan and the racist hate group Nation of Islam has voters leaving in droves. Chuck Schumer has been crushed and humiliated each and every time he proclaims he will obstruct the President. Tom Perez is a foul mouth and not much else, Ellison is a blatant racist. Elizabeth Warren is now pretending she's not running while funneling over $250,000 to state DNC's and still refusing to take a public DNA test to prove she didn't lie repeatedly to Americans of all parties. Bernie Sanders's wife is being prosecuted for a massive financial fraud...

Hillary is single-handedly draining the party of nearly all white women voters by repeatedly calling them stupid, and the apparent frontrunner for nomination is an ancient hanger-on whose main claim to fame is dozens of YouTube vids of him inappropriately groping children and wives of politicians and voters.

The top 2 donors to the party are Tom Steyer whom some may remember is the guy who bribed Kitzhaber and his wife, and is currently wasting $20,000,000 running silly ads calling for the impeachment of President Trump, and of course George Soros, whose first job was being a strongman enforcer for Adolf Hitler, beating up Jews and stealing their property. In an interview on CBS in the 90's Soros famously bragged that beating and stealing from Jews was the funnest time of his life.

Dems have ignored or derided every Trump success. Jobs, better pay, lower taxes, trade equality, exposing corrupt agency employees, standing up to foreign enemies with remarkable efficiency. The more they push the ridiculous Russian story, the more of their deep state moles are being fired and/or prosecuted.
How could Trump not run again? His landslide win will be the hugest ever! :cheers:
 
The View, LOL. I wouldn't watch that trash if it was the last news source on Earth, no matter what the video shows.

There must be a reason you can't find it on a credible source. Perhaps it's a context issue.

Guess you'll never know, perhaps it's a laziness issue on your part.
 
Ha!
I see most want HRC to go hide. The amusing part is, who takes her place?
Trump in a landslide!
 
Who's Hillary Clinton? I think about this about as much as I think about Gerald Ford...both are history ...be here now I say! Anybody with a fuckin' twitter account can have 5 minutes of fame these days....Hillary would be wise to duck out of the public conversation period....dead horse...

Pretty sure she's running again in 2020.

From prison of course. :cheers:
 
Only somewhat related, but interesting nonetheless.

McCabe found to be in violation of government rules by the inspector general. Was going to take his vacation days until he was eligible for pension.

Now he's going to be fired so he won't get his pension.

Brutal.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-03-14/andrew-mccabe-be-fired-days-ahead-retirement-nyt

Andrew McCabe To Be Fired Days Ahead Of Retirement: NYT

I've been hoping for this.

It should have been automatic, but for awhile it looked like they would let him live the high life on the backs of the Real Americans he defrauded.

We'll see.
 
I wish she would just go away and stop hurting the Democratic party. That's all she does.

She IS the Democratic Party.

Amazingly, her policies still form the party platform and her major backers are still the only real money keeping the party afloat.

If Dems don't QUICKLY find a fresh face nobody has ever heard of, a much more moderate and likeable face, they'll be known as the 3rd party in 2020.
 
She IS the Democratic Party.

Amazingly, her policies still form the party platform and her major backers are still the only real money keeping the party afloat.

If Dems don't QUICKLY find a fresh face nobody has ever heard of, a much more moderate and likeable face, they'll be known as the 3rd party in 2020.
I can't say I disagree with your last paragraph, unfortunately.
 
what are you imagining "loyalty" to mean here? like they are working behind the scenes to discredit Trump simply to gain her approval? because they want her to repay them in some way? what does this "loyalty to her" boil down to at this point?

Well, we know for sure McCabe and Comey both lied to the FBI. Like Flynn and PapaG did. So they'll get similar prison sentences.

What else they get is a mystery at this time.
 
The View, LOL. I wouldn't watch that trash if it was the last news source on Earth, no matter what the video shows.

There must be a reason you can't find it on a credible source. Perhaps it's a context issue.

It's a video. I don't think that all the sources have doctored it. Go onto whatever "credible source" it is you get your news from, and watch the video. And if you can't find it on your "trusted, credible source" ask yourself what else they're keeping from you, and why.
 
It's a video. I don't think that all the sources have doctored it. Go onto whatever "credible source" it is you get your news from, and watch the video. And if you can't find it on your "trusted, credible source" ask yourself what else they're keeping from you, and why.

S2 appears to be his only trusted news source. :cheers:
 
Guess you'll never know, perhaps it's a laziness issue on your part.

Not watching the view is what intelligent people do. I'd rather ratchet it up by spending my valuable time watching PBS The News Hour. I guess the time of those who watch the View is not valuable.
 
It's a video. I don't think that all the sources have doctored it. Go onto whatever "credible source" it is you get your news from, and watch the video. And if you can't find it on your "trusted, credible source" ask yourself what else they're keeping from you, and why.

Brian, I'm not the one who made the assertion. Debate 101.
 
Brian, I'm not the one who made the assertion. Debate 101.
It's not an assertion or a debate. She said what Denny said. You're saying it's fake news. I showed you a video. You don't believe it because it's been on both Fox News and the View.
Debate 202: Deflect and project. :dunno:

Fox News has the entire hour-plus-long video here. Surely you can't say they're biased if they show the entire unedited video of her speaking, right?

Here are some sites that show the clips (I mean, you can find them on YouTube, but...)
Business Insider
Washington Times
And in just stories that reference her speech, but don't show video or quote her talking about the enslavement of white women's minds by their husbands and fathers...
CBS News
ABC News

And where isn't there a story at all?
PBS NewsHour
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top