Zombie Democrats Leave Benghazi Hearing Before Testimony From Families of Victims

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

You're ignorant that 2 days earlier, people died, rioting about the video in Cairo? Figures...



No, I missed what you said. Let's arrange a physical meeting so you can tell me, pussy. Feel free to PM me and make an appointment.

Nobody in Cairo rioted because of the video. How can SlyPokerDog be so old, yet post so ignorantly?

Why isn't the terrorist who was the "mastermind" according to the NYT in US custody? The NYT found him, yet Obama can't?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Let's arrange a physical meeting so we can talk about what a pussy SlyPokerDog is. Feel free to PM me and make an appointment.

HAHAHAHA! The facade cracks. Are you two going to meet at Mt. Tabor, or will it be Mt. Scott?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
There were no Benghazis on Bush's watch.

The embassy in Baghdad was shelled by mortars fairly regularly, but we never lost our ambassador, and nobody lied about anything related the next day.

Weak.
 
There were no Benghazis on Bush's watch.

The embassy in Baghdad was shelled by mortars fairly regularly, but we never lost our ambassador, and nobody lied about anything related the next day.

Weak.

Bullshit.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html

Just because some political hacks claim Benghazi is "different" doesn't make it so.

The deaths in Benghazi are neither more nor less tragic than any death that occured in Iraq. They are no different than the deaths that occured in other embassy attacks.
 
Nobody in Cairo rioted because of the video. How can one be so old, yet post so ignorantly?

Why isn't the terrorist who was the "mastermind" according to the NYT in US custody? The NYT found him, yet Obama can't?

Is Wrong-O your middle name? One died in Egypt (out of at least 57 deaths all over the Middle East).

On September 11, 2012, a series of protests and violent attacks began in response to a YouTube trailer for a film called Innocence of Muslims, considered blasphemous by many Muslims. The reactions began at U.S. diplomatic mission in Cairo, Egypt, and quickly spread across the Muslim world to additional U.S. and other countries' diplomatic missions and other locations, with issues beyond the offense at the movie trailer becoming subjects of protest. In Cairo a group scaled the embassy wall and tore down the American flag to replace it with a black Islamic flag.

Also on September 11, a well-known group of local Islamist militants launched a planned attack on the U.S. diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, killing four Americans. Numerous eyewitnesses reported that the attackers said they were motivated by the video.[21][22][23][24][25][26] Though Libyan officials initially stated that hundreds of protesters had been present before the attack, it was later determined that no protesters had been present.[27][28] Republican critics accused the Obama Administration of overemphasizing the role of the video in the attack and launched numerous Congressional probes and investigations of the incident.

On September 13, protests occurred at the U.S. embassy in Sana'a, Yemen, resulting in the deaths of four protesters and injuries to thirty-five protesters and guards. On September 14, the U.S. consulate in Chennai was attacked, resulting in injuries to twenty-five protesters.[14] Protesters in Tunis, Tunisia, climbed the U.S. embassy walls and set trees on fire. At least four people were killed and forty-six injured during protests in Tunis on September 15.[6] Further protests were held at U.S. diplomatic missions and other locations in the days following the initial attacks. Related protests and attacks resulted in numerous deaths and injuries across the Middle East, Africa, Pakistan and Afghanistan

Over 50 deaths[hide]
12 (Afghanistan)[1]
23 (Pakistan)[2][3][4]
4 (Yemen)[5]
4 (Tunisia)[6]
4 (Israeli border)[7]
3 (Sudan)[8]
3 (Lebanon)[8][9]
1 (Egypt)[10]

At least 694-695 injured

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_diplomatic_missions_attacks

As for your second point, I already linked, in one of your dozens of Benghazi threads, to an article about Obama sending in the CIA a couple of months ago and suddenly a hundred people, including judges, were found murdered. You had complained that no one had come to trial, and I told you that's because all the leaders are already dead. But you keep ignoring the facts and keep repeating whatever Fox tells you.
 
Bullshit.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bob-cesca/13-benghazis-that-occurre_b_3246847.html

Just because some political hacks claim Benghazi is "different" doesn't make it so.

The deaths in Benghazi are neither more nor less tragic than any death that occured in Iraq. They are no different than the deaths that occured in other embassy attacks.

They're actually a lot different, tactically and strategically. First, there's a big strategic difference in killing an ambassador versus killing a soldier. You might as well say that Kennedy's assassination had no more or less effect than any one of the 58,286 deaths in Vietnam.

For one, this wasn't just an instantaneous event that killed an ambassador (like the other 7, which were bombings, kidnapping/murders or sniper shots). It was a long-running gun battle, mortar shelling and riot. There has been significant reporting that the ambassador and his team called for help, and the "help" was told to stand down (or was just never sent). As I said, this isn't a guy stepping on an IED or killed in a shootout on a patrol--it was a credentialed ambassador who, in the middle of a battle called for help and was left hanging. Do any of those HuffPost attacks follow the trend of a consulate/ambassador asking for help and being left to die?
 
It seems only seven US ambassadors have been killed in history, all since 1965. The last two on Obama's and Carter's watch.

It is a rare happening.

As Brian said, this was an extended military style battle, with an ambassador being killed. There have been two more embassies attacked since Benghazi, and they're not being questioned like Benghazi. For good reason.
 
Can't you Republicans find a new issue to entertain yourselves? Surely you are as bored with Benghazi as the whole country is.

Well, I just received PapaG's traditional "SlyPokerDog is such an asshole" Christmas PM.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HAHAHAHA! The facade cracks. Are you two going to meet at Mt. Tabor, or will it be Mt. Scott?

I guess your signature is untrue. In your case green font IS needed.
 
More embassy personnel died under Bush than under Obama.

Why no arrests? Why no detailed reports to the public or press? Why no Fox expose'?
 
If you two guys do meet up, please have someone videotape it and post a link. It is the least you can do.
 
More embassy personnel died under Bush than under Obama.

Why no arrests? Why no detailed reports to the public or press? Why no Fox expose'?

There were two hot wars and a war on terror going on in the Bush years. Obama's spikin' it in the end zone that we defeated Al Qaeda. That Benhazi looks like he spiked it at the 5 yard line like an idiot and photoshopped the instant replay to look like he was in the end zone is the issue.
 
There were two hot wars and a war on terror going on in the Bush years. Obama's spikin' it in the end zone that we defeated Al Qaeda. That Benhazi looks like he spiked it at the 5 yard line like an idiot and photoshopped the instant replay to look like he was in the end zone is the issue.

http://www.jewishpress.com/indepth/opinions/obamas-unseemly-end-zone-dance/2012/05/09/

The Corpsman at the VA Hospital love him too. They all introduce themselves as "Corpse Man" now. I put near split a gut when I was over there at the Roseburg VA hospital and a Corpsman came up to me and introduced
himself as "Corpse Man" Kelley! Damn you would think someone would clue the fuckup in once in awhile.
 
Wow, some of you lost your shit in this thread.
 
NYT had a reporter alongside the Benghazi murders.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journa...ing-to-the-Attackers-During-Benghazi-Massacre

Kirkpatrick tweeted Monday night that the Times had "a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack." His tweet prompted those on Twitter, including a former U.N. spokesperson for George W. Bush, to wonder if the Times knew who the attackers were and whether the reporter who was on the ground witnessed the murder of a U.S. Ambassador without calling for help:

@RichardGrenell we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack- still invaluable
— David D. Kirkpatrick (@ddknyt) December 30, 2013

NYT reporter says NYT knows who Benghazi attackers are > @ddknyt: we had a reporter on the scene talking to the attackers during the attack
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) December 31, 2013

@RichardGrenell @ddknyt Was the @nytimes reporter supposedly in #Benghazi witnessing the murder of Amb. Stevens an American?
— Robert C. O'Brien (@robertcobrien) December 31, 2013

@RichardGrenell @ddknyt Did the @nytimes supposedly in #Benghazi have a SAT phone? Did he call for help for Amb. Stevens & Sean Smith?
— Robert C. O'Brien (@robertcobrien) December 31, 2013
 
Last edited:
"Pure intimidation" described by FauxNews, er, CNN.

[video=youtube;eocpTZD3xAQ]
 
There were two hot wars and a war on terror going on in the Bush years.

That's right. Bush started 2 wars for the MIC and sacrificed 3,000 American servicemen, in addition to failing to protect our embassies from 13 deadly attacks.

We could point out how Bush got Americans killed on every continent on Earth and has likely caused the deaths of our great-grandchildren but you're straying from the point of the thread which is to blame dems and praise reps for the exact same acts.
 
That's right. Bush started 2 wars for the MIC and sacrificed 3,000 American servicemen, in addition to failing to protect our embassies from 13 deadly attacks.

We could point out how Bush got Americans killed on every continent on Earth and has likely caused the deaths of our great-grandchildren but you're straying from the point of the thread which is to blame dems and praise reps for the exact same acts.

It's not our job to protect our embassies. It's the job of the nations where the embassies are located. In Iraq, where we were occupiers, we made the green zone, which was as protected from deadly attacks as can be.

JFK's and LBJ's hot war killed 50,000+, but who's counting?

I don't praise the republicans for any of this. I just don't think they lied about any attacks the day after for political gain.
 
"Pure intimidation" described by FauxNews, er, CNN.

[video=youtube;eocpTZD3xAQ]


While playing politics with CIA secrets, Republicans know that Obama can't open up about why the Benghazi consulate had to maintain low visibility, and thus had to rely upon Libyan government security instead of importing American troops to protect it. CNN says, at 4:45, that what is being covered up is that the CIA used Benghazi as a waystation to move SAMs from the U.S. to Libya to Turkey to Syrian terrorists trying to overthrow Assad. I (and the hypocritical Fox News) always knew there was a legitimate CIA reason for ignoring Republicans playing politics with national secrets.
 
No excuse not to defend the ambassador and his people there. Was this CIA base going to be used after the alamo type slaughter?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top