Dinosaurs and man coexisting

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Dinosaurs is such an ambiguous term. We coexist with alligators right now.
 
Dinosaurs is such an ambiguous term. We coexist with alligators right now.

True, but some art is pretty particular to a stegosaurus in Asia. The temple was dated back thousands of years ago.

Not trying to go creationist here. You should look at the pictures. It wasn't an alligator or snake. These were actual dinosaurs we know today
 
The carvings themselves are very interesting. The temples aren't all that old, however. We're talking about something built beginning in the 12th, I think. The implication from the site is that the carver is an eye witness to a stegosaurus in the 12th Century?
 
The carvings themselves are very interesting. The temples aren't all that old, however. We're talking about something built beginning in the 12th, I think. The implication from the site is that the carver is an eye witness to a stegosaurus in the 12th Century?

Well the unusual circumstance that even in the 12th century, there wasn't a stegosaurus fossil already learned about.
 
Reason why I brought this up is I'm watching ancient aliens and they talked about this shit. When I searched, most were from creationists
 
Seems plausible that the plates are in the background and meant to represent something else. The lack of tail spikes and the huge head (stegosaur had tiny heads) suggests that it isn't based off one.
 
For reference:

IMG_3585.jpg


Stegosaurus_BW.jpg
 
I think if there were dinosaurs on the planet not even 1000 years ago, we'd have far more evidence. it's not like they were small.
 
I think if there were dinosaurs on the planet not even 1000 years ago, we'd have far more evidence. it's not like they were small.

There was a T. Rex fossil that still had red blood cells in the marrow. If that's true; carbon couldn't have existed longer than 20k years ago
 
I dunno. The squiggly drawing could be a dinosaur I guess.
 
Dinosaurs disappeared 65 million years ago. Man is maybe 200,000 years on the planet.

Do the math.
 
Dinosaurs disappeared 65 million years ago. Man is maybe 200,000 years on the planet.

Do the math.

You like science and seem pretty on point. The T. Rex fossil with red blood cells is impossible; even if it was in ice. Soft tissue cannot be preserved for 60+ millions of years
 
There was a T. Rex fossil that still had red blood cells in the marrow. If that's true; carbon couldn't have existed longer than 20k years ago

Link?
 
You like science and seem pretty on point. The T. Rex fossil with red blood cells is impossible; even if it was in ice. Soft tissue cannot be preserved for 60+ millions of years
Schweitzer's discovery has been under scrutiny.
 
Looks plausible but the tail isn't quite right. The carver gave his image a thick one.

far more plausible than it being a dinosaur.
 
far more plausible than it being a dinosaur.

Based on how many hours it would take to chip that image into the stone you've gotta think the artist would try hard to get it right. Maybe a wispy tail would be hard to do without it cracking as he dug around it?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top