- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 34,412
- Likes
- 43,903
- Points
- 113
I think it's pretty obvious that guys good enough to be one-and-dones are exempt from the basic rules.
It's arguable that Syracuse guys get overrated because Boeheim's system (especially his defensive scheme) makes players look better than they are, and masks their deficiencies. There's legitimacy to that viewpoint. The same can legitimately be said--in general--about Duke players. Kyrie doesn't count because he's a on-and-done talent; same with Deng. Boozer actually had the opposite problem--playing in K's system actually masked how effective he would be at the pro level, whereas Battier was the superior college player but was only average as a pro.
I don't think it's fair to say that a player who played at Syracuse is no good because he set foot on their campus, but I do believe it's fair to acknowledge that the transition from Boeheim's system to the NBA seems to be difficult for almost all of his players, and that teams should, at the very least, be wary of drafting multi-year Boeheimers with lotto picks.
It's arguable that Syracuse guys get overrated because Boeheim's system (especially his defensive scheme) makes players look better than they are, and masks their deficiencies. There's legitimacy to that viewpoint. The same can legitimately be said--in general--about Duke players. Kyrie doesn't count because he's a on-and-done talent; same with Deng. Boozer actually had the opposite problem--playing in K's system actually masked how effective he would be at the pro level, whereas Battier was the superior college player but was only average as a pro.
I don't think it's fair to say that a player who played at Syracuse is no good because he set foot on their campus, but I do believe it's fair to acknowledge that the transition from Boeheim's system to the NBA seems to be difficult for almost all of his players, and that teams should, at the very least, be wary of drafting multi-year Boeheimers with lotto picks.
