Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,242
- Likes
- 57,506
- Points
- 113
I've been thinking about this a lot lately. Do you subscribe to the idea that a team needs a third star to be a contender?
Miami has LeBron/Wade/Bosh. San Antonio has Duncan/Parker/Manu.
Dallas had a mish-mash of former and current stars. Not sure if they would really fit the mold when they won the championship a few years ago.
Are we going back to the two star setup?
OKC has Westbrook/Durant. Houston has Howard/Harden. LAC has Paul/Blake.
So in your opinion, are we good with LA/Dame or do we need a third star? Are three stars too much? Do we have a third star in Batum? I'm just curious what people think about this.
Miami has LeBron/Wade/Bosh. San Antonio has Duncan/Parker/Manu.
Dallas had a mish-mash of former and current stars. Not sure if they would really fit the mold when they won the championship a few years ago.
Are we going back to the two star setup?
OKC has Westbrook/Durant. Houston has Howard/Harden. LAC has Paul/Blake.
So in your opinion, are we good with LA/Dame or do we need a third star? Are three stars too much? Do we have a third star in Batum? I'm just curious what people think about this.
