I'm in awe of technology and it's implications, both good and bad.
The thing about evolving tech is that economies always came up with new ways to employ people. People stop needing buggy whips so there are jobs making cars. Car manufacturing goes out and service jobs come in.
But there's no law that says economies always create employment, forever. So many jobs are being replaced by automation, databases, software....and not everybody is suited for STEM (Science/Tech/Engineering/Math) jobs. And even those jobs could become replaced with Watson-like programs.
I used to own a $300 Garmin I'd use for hiking. My latest smartphone has a better GPS mapping app I bought for $10, and I'll own that app forever. I for damn sure ain't going to spend more than $10 if something better comes along that I might replace it with. How many software engineers will get laid off at Garmin because some guy made this app on the weekends?
I just don't see the jobs in another generation or two to support people. How does capitalism survive without labor?
Does everybody live off wealth transfers from governments? Or do we all thrive by owning stocks? Both have major downsides.
Seems like we're heading for a time when you've got your Star Trek-types out there exploring new worlds in a post-capitalist utopia, which sounds great. Until you remember that most people are lazy as fuck, and most people aren't Captain Kirk. 90%+ of society sits in hover chairs a la WALL-E eating liquified muffins through straws. And that's not good for society.