dunksworth
JBB JustBBall Member
- Joined
- Jun 25, 2004
- Messages
- 524
- Likes
- 0
- Points
- 16
I bring this up because I just watched "Control Room" a while ago and it brought up some interesting points on how the media functions. I'm not sure how popular this movie is in the States (it got practically zero attention in Canada), but for those who don't know about it, it's a feature length documentary film that compares how both the Al-Jazeera network and American media covered the War in Iraq. Unlike a Michael Moore film, Control Room was a lot more objective and a lot less one-sided. I guess the overall message of the film is that although we may think negatively about Al-Jazeera, we learn that both medias are actually very similar, in that they both play into their key audiences. As a US lieutenant put it, "It benefits Al-Jazeera to play to Arab nationalism because that's their audience, just like Fox plays to American patriotism, for the exact same reason... because that's their audience".
In the film, an Al-Jazeera producer states that governments never go to war without the aid of propaganda through the media, and that would include both the Iraqi and American governments. Take for example the coverage of Saddam's statue being brought down shortly after the Americans gained control of Baghdad. The movie discusses how this was a staged event orchestrated by the US Army. They supposedly invited the media to watch as they brought in a bunch of rowdy anti-Saddam citizens from outside of Baghdad to celebrate around al-Fardus (Paradise) square while they bring the statue down.
And in the movie "Bowling for Columbine", which I assume many of you watched already, Moore discusses how the media is no different from any other business in that their main objective is to produce profits. So despite their claims of bringing relavent and substantial news, their main focus is to show whatever gets them the highest ratings.
Moore also brings up a good point about how the media uses fear as a tool to catch the viewers attention. Basically, as long as the audience is scared, then they will listen. It was interesting when he brought up that time when the media all of a sudden focused heavily on sharks attacks, despite the fact that shark attacks were actually down that year.
Anyways, sorry for rambling like that but I'm just wondering what the general consensus is regarding the media.
Do you trust every word they say?
Do you still consider them a reasonably reliable source for information?
Do you listen to what they have to say with an objective ear?
Do you consider them a joke?
In the film, an Al-Jazeera producer states that governments never go to war without the aid of propaganda through the media, and that would include both the Iraqi and American governments. Take for example the coverage of Saddam's statue being brought down shortly after the Americans gained control of Baghdad. The movie discusses how this was a staged event orchestrated by the US Army. They supposedly invited the media to watch as they brought in a bunch of rowdy anti-Saddam citizens from outside of Baghdad to celebrate around al-Fardus (Paradise) square while they bring the statue down.
And in the movie "Bowling for Columbine", which I assume many of you watched already, Moore discusses how the media is no different from any other business in that their main objective is to produce profits. So despite their claims of bringing relavent and substantial news, their main focus is to show whatever gets them the highest ratings.
Moore also brings up a good point about how the media uses fear as a tool to catch the viewers attention. Basically, as long as the audience is scared, then they will listen. It was interesting when he brought up that time when the media all of a sudden focused heavily on sharks attacks, despite the fact that shark attacks were actually down that year.
Anyways, sorry for rambling like that but I'm just wondering what the general consensus is regarding the media.
Do you trust every word they say?
Do you still consider them a reasonably reliable source for information?
Do you listen to what they have to say with an objective ear?
Do you consider them a joke?