Politics Donald Trump Jr just confessed to Trump campaign election fraud

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Okay though honestly yeah trump is this ego driven immature retard blah blah blah but why when Hillary and her issues are brought up do you guys quickly denounce them when the evidence there is staggering with emails, the ones that leaked, money she made from bankers, dnc fucking Bernie over. Why do you not address this yet you run with the Russia/trump story that honestly doesn't have much evidence to it because if it did, he would of been impeached a while ago. im no trump supporter by any means, I don't care for him but this Russia/trump thing to me was obviously created as an excuse to why he won because people can't believe it and America never wants to be embarrassed like that.
 
Okay though honestly yeah trump is this ego driven immature retard blah blah blah but why when Hillary and her issues are brought up do you guys quickly denounce them when the evidence there is staggering with emails, the ones that leaked, money she made from bankers, dnc fucking Bernie over. Why do you not address this yet you run with the Russia/trump story that honestly doesn't have much evidence to it because if it did, he would of been impeached a while ago. im no trump supporter by any means, I don't care for him but this Russia/trump thing to me was obviously created as an excuse to why he won because people can't believe it and America never wants to be embarrassed like that.

I'm fine with locking Hillary up.
 
I agree with Trump!
8epmq2h4fs9z.jpg
 
Okay though honestly yeah trump is this ego driven immature retard blah blah blah but why when Hillary and her issues are brought up do you guys quickly denounce them when the evidence there is staggering with emails, the ones that leaked, money she made from bankers, dnc fucking Bernie over.

Blah blah blah. She's not president, that's why. There would be 50 million investigations going on if she was.

Why do you not address this yet you run with the Russia/trump story that honestly doesn't have much evidence to it because if it did, he would of been impeached a while ago.

Republicans decide whether to impeach or not. It doesn't have anything to do with evidence.

im no trump supporter by any means, I don't care for him but this Russia/trump thing to me was obviously created as an excuse to why he won because people can't believe it and America never wants to be embarrassed like that.

Uhm, it was invented long before the election as an excuse for why he won? Does that somehow make sense to you?

barfo
 
Blah blah blah. She's not president, that's why. There would be 50 million investigations going on if she was.



Republicans decide whether to impeach or not. It doesn't have anything to do with evidence.



Uhm, it was invented long before the election as an excuse for why he won? Does that somehow make sense to you?

barfo
She wasn't president but was Secretary of State, ran twice as president. I guess that doesn't mean much to you. It's all about sides with you. You're happy addressing one side but ignoring the other as long as it fits your views. It has everything to do with evidence. You mean to tell me intelligence agencies can't figure this out? Come on they would of had the evidence months ago and he would be out of office. People don't wanna take time to understand how he could win. It's simple. Middle America, everybody forgets them. He spoke to them with the job bullshit and they voted. Out of no where a trump/Russia story comes up and makes no sense because Russia has nothing to gain with him as president. Problem is in this country if you repeat it enough times, people believe it so the media pounded away at that like they do everything else and now everybody believes it. Sure I would believe it too, if there was concrete evidence.
 
She wasn't president but was Secretary of State, ran twice as president. I guess that doesn't mean much to you. It's all about sides with you. You're happy addressing one side but ignoring the other as long as it fits your views.

As I remember it, Clinton was investigated a whole bunch of times. Whitewater, Benghazi, emails, etc.
The main reason she's not being investigated now (so far as we know) is that she's a private citizen now.

It has everything to do with evidence.

Then you don't understand the impeachment process.

You mean to tell me intelligence agencies can't figure this out? Come on they would of had the evidence months ago and he would be out of office.

The investigation is ongoing. There were some new developments this past week, perhaps you missed them?

Out of no where a trump/Russia story comes up and makes no sense because Russia has nothing to gain with him as president.

It didn't come out of nowhere. You just weren't paying attention. Trump and Russia have been in the news for well over a year.

And Russia clearly does have something to gain from having a Russia-friendly president. And whatever you believe about collusion, you can't deny that Trump is Russia-friendly.

Problem is in this country if you repeat it enough times, people believe it so the media pounded away at that like they do everything else and now everybody believes it. Sure I would believe it too, if there was concrete evidence.

So what did you think Trump Jr.'s emails are, if not concrete evidence? Do you think he faked them?

barfo
 
As I remember it, Clinton was investigated a whole bunch of times. Whitewater, Benghazi, emails, etc.
The main reason she's not being investigated now (so far as we know) is that she's a private citizen now.



Then you don't understand the impeachment process.



The investigation is ongoing. There were some new developments this past week, perhaps you missed them?



It didn't come out of nowhere. You just weren't paying attention. Trump and Russia have been in the news for well over a year.

And Russia clearly does have something to gain from having a Russia-friendly president. And whatever you believe about collusion, you can't deny that Trump is Russia-friendly.



So what did you think Trump Jr.'s emails are, if not concrete evidence? Do you think he faked them?

barfo
That's what I mean though, Clinton has been in politics forever and they have done some dirty shit but they are protected by the government so even with the concrete evidence do you really think they would do anything to her? No, you need to understand how it works. The media treated her like a goddess and it was to try and sway others to vote for her and it worked in the most pretentious areas of America where everybody lives in a bubble in the city. I'm just saying at least acknowledge the shit she did, you can't just act like it didn't happen because it did. I would be more than happy to sit here and talk about shit trump has done that it bad, I'm sure to be a billionaire you gotta do some shit to people. I'm not saying trump isn't guilty of anything except that I see no real evidence of this Russia/trump thing. The Donald trump junior thing to me only showed he lied, other than that it shows nothing about some collusion. I fucking hate how he coined the term fake news because now when I say what I have been saying for years that the media is indeed bullshit, people wanna say I'm pro trump. No, that's not the case, I have never trusted the mainstream media. They twist and turn things to make you believe shit but when you research most of what they say it's completely inncaurate. Even local news does that shit.
 
Trump Campaign Paid Don Jr.’s Lawyer $50,000 Two Weeks Before Email Scandal

About two weeks before the release of emails showing Donald Trump Jr. seeking opposition research from attorneys representing the Russian government, his father’s reelection campaign began paying the law firm now representing Trump Jr. in the ensuing political and legal fallout.

A new filing with the Federal Election Commission shows that President Trump’s reelection campaign paid $50,000 to the law offices of Alan Futerfas on June 26. That was around the time, Yahoo News reports, that the president’s legal team learned of a June 2016 email exchange in which Trump Jr., through an associate, solicited damaging information about 2016 election rival Hillary Clinton.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-...er-dollar50000-two-weeks-before-email-scandal
 
The Donald trump junior thing to me only showed he lied,

Why lie about something supposedly so innocent? And once the lie was found out why create a new lie? And then a new lie? And even a new lie after that?
 
Trump Campaign Paid Don Jr.’s Lawyer $50,000 Two Weeks Before Email Scandal

About two weeks before the release of emails showing Donald Trump Jr. seeking opposition research from attorneys representing the Russian government, his father’s reelection campaign began paying the law firm now representing Trump Jr. in the ensuing political and legal fallout.

A new filing with the Federal Election Commission shows that President Trump’s reelection campaign paid $50,000 to the law offices of Alan Futerfas on June 26. That was around the time, Yahoo News reports, that the president’s legal team learned of a June 2016 email exchange in which Trump Jr., through an associate, solicited damaging information about 2016 election rival Hillary Clinton.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-...er-dollar50000-two-weeks-before-email-scandal

 
Why lie about something supposedly so innocent? And once the lie was found out why create a new lie? And then a new lie? And even a new lie after that?
I have no idea why he lied, yeah obviously that seems fishy, but if we are gonna run with this Russia/trump thing I want actual concrete evidence. Everything released so far on this supposed collusion is all very light and can be interpreted as business as usual as opposed to a collusion. I'm not saying there is no collusion, I just don't see the evidence. It's different when the Hillary shit happened, those emails were leaked, the dnc emails were leaked. Trump has 3 and a half years left, I'm sure those years will go by and everybody will still be talking about some collusion when there is a new president and blah blah blah. I understand people are concerned on different policies that may or may not dictate things in their life but man this shit gets old. It's the same politicians doing the same things, making the same promises that never happen. People would be surprised, there are multi billionaires out there that probably have more pull than the president depending on interests.
 
That's what I mean though, Clinton has been in politics forever and they have done some dirty shit but they are protected by the government so even with the concrete evidence do you really think they would do anything to her? No, you need to understand how it works. The media treated her like a goddess and it was to try and sway others to vote for her and it worked in the most pretentious areas of America where everybody lives in a bubble in the city.

Which happens to be the majority of the country, population-wise.

I'm just saying at least acknowledge the shit she did, you can't just act like it didn't happen because it did.

Oh, Hillary definitely did the shit she did. And she didn't do the shit she didn't. I absolutely agree with that.

I would be more than happy to sit here and talk about shit trump has done that it bad, I'm sure to be a billionaire you gotta do some shit to people. I'm not saying trump isn't guilty of anything except that I see no real evidence of this Russia/trump thing. The Donald trump junior thing to me only showed he lied, other than that it shows nothing about some collusion. I fucking hate how he coined the term fake news because now when I say what I have been saying for years that the media is indeed bullshit, people wanna say I'm pro trump. No, that's not the case, I have never trusted the mainstream media. They twist and turn things to make you believe shit but when you research most of what they say it's completely inncaurate. Even local news does that shit.

You are right, the media does get some things wrong, and there is some bias. However, your solution of depending on even less reliable sources of information is counterproductive.

barfo
 
Which happens to be the majority of the country, population-wise.



Oh, Hillary definitely did the shit she did. And she didn't do the shit she didn't. I absolutely agree with that.



You are right, the media does get some things wrong, and there is some bias. However, your solution of depending on even less reliable sources of information is counterproductive.

barfo
Well the majority isn't very smart. What are my sources since you know exactly where I go to get my information
 
The India Bollywood Film awards were held in New Jersey tonight and this was their host.

DE1FxFCUIAADU2K.jpg
 
Well the majority isn't very smart. What are my sources since you know exactly where I go to get my information

No idea what your sources are, but they clearly aren't up to snuff.

barfo
 
No idea what your sources are, but they clearly aren't up to snuff.

barfo
Then I don't know how you can say they aren't reliable. Sorry it's not from a far left or right source with bias. It's multiple different sources but it all starts with a search. All I know is you can't tell me of concrete evidence there is a collusion, so whatever I'm researching, must be right.
 
No idea what your sources are, but they clearly aren't up to snuff.

barfo

I'm guessing the internet. The internet is also my source. You should try it sometime.
 
You flushed any credibility on that away when you posted your The Boy who cried wolf BS, Fox News has been saying that all week.

#Sad

I don't watch Fox News. Sadly, I'm one of CNN's few viewers.

So once again, you make an accusation proven wrong.

Keep it up! Or devolve to insults. Whichever floats your boat.
 
I don't watch Fox News. Sadly, I'm one of CNN's few viewers.

So once again, you make an accusation proven wrong.

Keep it up! Or devolve to insults. Whichever floats your boat.

Uh huh.

Wait, so saying you watch Fox News is a personal insult?!?
 
Uh huh.

Wait, so saying you watch Fox News is a personal insult?!?

I don't watch Fox News, nor get my opinion from their sources.

Watching CNN now, they're whining about right wing media hawking some theory that Jr was part of scheme to entrap him. I find that as ridiculous as the collusion claim.

I post my own opinion, mostly formed by response to the absurdity coming from CNN, the "news" as presented by the various print outlets, etc.

How about this Pulitzer Prize winner? I speak for myself, but what he says is how I see it.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...n_for_anything_not_evidence_of_any_crime.html

Greenwald: Donald Trump Jr.'s Emails Are Not A "Smoking Gun" Of Anything; Democrats Keep "Moving Goal Posts" For Allegations

We speak with Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Glenn Greenwald, co-founder of The Intercept, who notes that Democrats have had similar entanglements with foreign governments.

"I don’t think that this revelation, interesting though it may be, is as significant or a smoking gun when it comes to the impeachment or the prosecution case," Greenwald said about the Donald Trump Jr. emails.

He explained: "To me, it seems as though the people who are moving the goalposts are the Democrats. The claim all along, the reason why there’s talk of impeachment, the reason why there is a special prosecutor, the reason why people want to see Trump and his associates criminally prosecuted, is because of the claim that they committed crimes by colluding with the Russians with regard to the hacking. That’s what Harry Reid has always said. That’s what John Podesta has always said. That has always been the Democratic claim."

"This newest evidence doesn’t in any way suggest that," he concluded.
 
BTW, that Greenwald interview was by Democracy Now!, a far left wing "news" channel.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top