Is it misleading if you are trying to make a move, but the offers you get are garbage so you don't make a move? Remember how he got roasted when he did make moves that brought very little back? There were discussions, but no one was willing to give up what the Blazers thought was equal value, or no one thought the #3 pick + was equal value for what they were giving up.
Was he supposed to sell at 60 cents on the dollar? 70? 80? What would have been an acceptable number? They are trying to make deals, but they just have very few tradeable pieces. They had the #3 which was worth a lot. #23, not worth that much. Nurkic, worth even less. Little, not worth a lot. Ant, worth some, but an undersized SG, sometimes PG isn't bringing in massive offers. So now you have to start combining all of those and you end up with very little left and a gutted roster.
Everyone asked about Sharpe and why wouldn't they? He has massive potential and is on a rookie deal which is worth GOLD with the new CBA coming up. To #3, Sharpe AND Ant + for the salary cap money to make a deal work? That is a lot to give up...and for what? Siakam who has said he isn't resigning? A very talented but oft injured, overweight, poor social decision making Zion? Nets weren't trading Bridges. So I'm wondering what was legitimately out there that Cronin was supposed to move so many assets for that wouldn't have left Portland with a shell of a roster and nothing but some exceptions to fill everything else out with?