Ed Davis ranks 61st in Saletta's top 100

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Denny Crane

It's not even loaded!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
73,125
Likes
10,974
Points
113
http://www.todaysfastbreak.com/nba-...alettas-summer-top-100-countdown-61-ed-davis/

There will probably be some brush back on this, but let’s put things into a context that justifies Davis’ placement this high. Last season, he recorded .192 WS/48, a Player Efficiency Rating of 18.7 and a usage percentage of 12.7. In the history of the NBA, only two players have gotten that kind of production with that little usage, according to Basketball-Reference.com. Look how Davis compares with them in the advanced stats:

Totals Advanced
Rk Player Season Age Tm MP PER ORB% DRB% TRB% STL% BLK% USG% WS/48 DBPM
1 Tyson Chandler 2011-12 29 NYK 2061 18.7 11.8 22.7 17.2 1.4 3.4 13.0 .220 2.8
2 Tyson Chandler 2014-15 32 DAL 2286 20.1 14.1 27.4 20.7 0.9 3.2 12.8 .216 2.3
3 Tyson Chandler 2012-13 30 NYK 2164 18.9 14.1 24.3 19.0 1.0 3.0 13.0 .207 1.8
4 Ed Davis 2015-16 26 POR 1684 18.7 14.4 24.2 19.3 1.7 3.3 12.7 .192 2.5
5 Ben Wallace 2001-02 27 DET 2921 18.6 12.9 28.9 21.0 2.5 6.7 10.5 .190 6.5
Provided by Basketball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 8/24/2016.

He’s not a big usage guy, and he doesn’t get a huge number of touches, but there’s no denying his impact on the game. His rebound, block and steal percentages are right there with prime Tyson Chandler and not too far behind Ben Wallace.

That’s a pretty persuasive demonstration of what he contributes off the ball. And when I looked at impact-to-production ratio, he ranked 30th in the NBA. Davis is not a box score star, but he makes his presence felt.
 
People said last year that PF was our biggest weakness. But an Aminu/Davis rotation at the 4 is easily on the top 10 amongst the league. It also may be the best defensive combo at the 4 in the league.

And we achieved that without even bringing in anyone new.
 
NO has a great eye for talent. This team is built on drafting and developing the stars and signing players that fit well and are winners.

He's traded for draft picks for the most part. His two player acquisitions were both outstanding moves: Aflallo and Harkless. The Aflallo trade didn't pan out, but the injury to Wes was more devastating than you'd think.
 
NO has a great eye for talent. This team is built on drafting and developing the stars and signing players that fit well and are winners.

He's traded for draft picks for the most part. His two player acquisitions were both outstanding moves: Aflallo and Harkless. The Aflallo trade didn't pan out, but the injury to Wes was more devastating than you'd think.

LOGIC. Common sense!
 
I loved Ed in LA, but didn't really know his game prior to that, other than always hearing about teams being high on his potential.

What I think gets overlooked with him is how amazingly soft his touch is around the basket. Power moves like that usually are dunks or clanks, but Ed works the backboard with amazing precision.
 
Those are people who say that we should get rid of any big man who isn't an excellent shooter with range. I prefer Cs and PFs who can't shoot. It keeps their minds on what they should be doing.
I think it's nice to have a healthy balance of both.
 
These idiots put CJ McCollum at 59 LMAO
 
Oh, good point! Then this is wrong then for CJ

I ain't never been so good with numbers.
All good--wasn't trying to critique, just clarify. I agree with you on this. I'd think CJ belongs somewhere around 40.
 
59 is 2nd best player on a team in this league.
Barely. So there's 28 #2s better than him? Not too mention he'd be the best player on Brooklyn, Philadelphia, LAL, Denver, and Orlando, just to name a few.
 
That's not exactly right.

The Warriors have 3x #2 players better than most teams'
Based on HCP's use of the word "average", I was commenting based on hypothetical even talent distribution.

So yes, based on the parameters of the post, it is exactly right.
 
Based on HCP's use of the word "average", I was commenting based on hypothetical even talent distribution.

So yes, based on the parameters of the post, it is exactly right.

The players simply aren't distributed evenly, though.

Considering the Warriors and not other teams, he'd realistically be 2nd best player on the 5th worst team. I suspect if all teams' depth charts were considered, he'd pencil out to 2nd best player on the 8th best team or so :)
 
Barely. So there's 28 #2s better than him? Not too mention he'd be the best player on Brooklyn, Philadelphia, LAL, Denver, and Orlando, just to name a few.

Not exactly. There are 3x #2s better than him on the Warriors, and many teams have #2 not as good.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top