ESPN Insider: Blazers Predictions........

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

THE HCP

NorthEastPortland'sFinest
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
72,879
Likes
62,057
Points
113
http://insider.espn.com/nba/insider...5-preview-damian-lillard-cj-mccollum-more-nba

Five of their writers answering questions about our boys.....
Arnovitz, Verrier, Ford, Engelman and Pelton.

2. What is the biggest issue facing the Blazers this season?
Arnovitz: The 20th-ranked defense from a year ago needs to stiffen this season for Portland to take a big leap forward. The Blazers are confident that the continuity of the roster, coupled with another year of seasoning, should push them firmly up the ledger. Hassan Whiteside would've provided the rim protection the Trail Blazers covet, but such is life at the free-agency bazaar.

Ford: Are there enough shots for Damian Lillard, C.J. McCollum, Turner and Crabbe? They want to match the firepower of the Warriors, but I think there could be some major chemistry issues.

Verrier: Defense. The Blazers proved last postseason that they have the scoring punch to trade blows with any team, but it will be hard to match the same deep run in a top-heavy West with a bottom-third defense. It doesn't help that Festus Ezeli, who figured to provide some sorely needed rim protection, has yet to suit up in preseason because of a knee injury.

Engelmann: Point guard depth is an issue. The only true PG on the roster, besides Lillard, is Shabazz Napier, who recorded a -4.4 RPM last season, good for bottom 25 in the league. Yes, McCollum and Turner can handle the ball-handling duties, but Napier has looked almost useless in all other facets of the game as well.

Pelton: Expectations. As noted on the Lakers' broadcast earlier this week, last season was actually the second-worst of the strong Neil Olshey/Terry Stotts era in Portland, but it felt like a huge win because virtually nobody saw it coming. If the Blazers win 44 games again, it will be seen as a disappointment.



3. What needs to happen for the Blazers to be a power in the West?

Pelton: I think they would need a third player to get in the All-Star discussion, presumably in the frontcourt. Realistically, Noah Vonleh is probably the best hope of that happening on the roster.

Engelmann: That window was open this past summer. But the Blazers, in my opinion, blew it when they signed Crabbe and Turner to a combined $145M. Had they used the money to sign Jared Dudley and Matthew Dellavedovainstead, I'd declare them a powerhouse now. As it is, they probably have to hope for further internal growth.

Arnovitz: Pristine health and exceptional progress in the development of at least one or two of their young players. If Crabbe can shoot 42 percent from deep and grow into a rugged wing defender, if Aminu can learn to initiate offense from the wing and continues to hone his shot, if Leonard returns to 50-40-90 form, you can imagine a scenario in which Portland racks up a win total in the 50 range -- but that's a lot of stars to align.

Ford: They are right there with the Spurs, Jazz and Clippers, in my opinion -- all vying for second place in the West. I'd put them fifth, but if their big scorers are all healthy, they can put up points with anyone.

Verrier: A trade for a high-level difference-maker. Portland is deservedly brimming with hope. Its team is young and stretchy and plays aesthetically pleasing basketball. Lillard is a snarly brand of superstar you can get behind. But in an era of super teams, the Blazers appear destined for a Hawksian malaise when they bump their head on their current ceiling once or twice.



4. What trade would make the most sense for the Blazers?
Arnovitz: Portland's brass would ideally like to continue developing its assets and, at the optimal time, aggregate them to acquire a big gun. The elephant in Rip City is whether one of those pieces could ever be McCollum, the NBA's reigning Most Improved Player, who is adored by his teammates, the Blazers' staff and the fan base alike. If the Trail Blazers found an opportunity, would they move him? At present, that's one of the most closely held secrets in the NBA.

Verrier: A swing for the fences. With their cadre of above-average young 'uns and all of their future first-rounders (plus Cleveland's in 2018), the Blazers can put together one of the more appealing packages for a disgruntled star, especially if they're willing to part with C.J. McCollum. I'm not sure of DeMarcus Cousins' interest in craft beer, but a team buoyed by Lillard and an All-Star big man was a serious threat in the West just two years ago (before an injury robbed them of Wes Matthews).

Engelmann: Besides Lillard and McCollum, I doubt the Blazers would get much in return for most players on their roster. They own the Cavs' 2018 1st-rounder, so maybe they can package that with one of their own to create an enticing package. Getting a decent combo guard would help tremendously.

Ford: I think finding a swap for Turner or Crabbe that brought back a more dominant big would give them more balance. They need the equivalent of a Draymond Green-type player right now -- a versatile, multipositional big who can stretch the floor and protect the rim (thought that won't be easy to get). Meyers Leonard and Mason Plumlee are solid, but they could use an upgrade.

Pelton: Even if Festus Ezeli can't give the Blazers regular contributions due to his knee injuries, there's still a crowd up front now that Al-Farouq Aminu is a full-time power forward. So it's probably Portland dealing one of its big men -- either Ed Davis, the oldest player in the group, or Mason Plumlee instead of signing him to a new, more lucrative contract.


5. Fact or Fiction: The Blazers will make the Western Conference final four.
Arnovitz: Fiction, for no other reason that the field is large and the Jazz might be just a smidge better this season. That said, the Trail Blazers show up for big games and cut their teeth during a magical run last spring. In short, it's improbable, but certainly not unfathomable.

Verrier: Fiction. The Blazers should again be in the middle of the traffic jam for the bottom half of the West's playoff bracket, but it's hard envisioning an encore with as much gusto considering last year's path to the second round was cleared by injuries to their opposition's two best players.

Ford: Fiction. I have them fifth in the West, but the distance between them, the Jazz and the Clippers is very short.

Engelmann: Fiction. My projections see five teams battling for the No. 3 and 4 spots in the West, with the Blazers being one of the weaker teams of those five. That would result in a less than 40 percent chance of having homecourt advantage in the first round, making it unlikely they'll advance.

Pelton: Fiction. Certainly, their chances are better than they were this time a year ago, when it proved to be fact. But I wouldn't put the Blazers among the top four teams in the West entering this season, and things get muddled outside of that group.
 
Ford: Are there enough shots for Damian Lillard, C.J. McCollum, Turner and Crabbe? They want to match the firepower of the Warriors, but I think there could be some major chemistry issues.

Yes, because this team has such HORRIBLE chemistry. Did Chad Ford watch this team play even once last year?

5. Fact or Fiction: The Blazers will make the Western Conference final four.
Arnovitz:
Fiction, for no other reason that the field is large and the Jazz might be just a smidge better this season. That said, the Trail Blazers show up for big games and cut their teeth during a magical run last spring. In short, it's improbable, but certainly not unfathomable.

Verrier: Fiction. The Blazers should again be in the middle of the traffic jam for the bottom half of the West's playoff bracket, but it's hard envisioning an encore with as much gusto considering last year's path to the second round was cleared by injuries to their opposition's two best players.

Ford: Fiction. I have them fifth in the West, but the distance between them, the Jazz and the Clippers is very short.

Engelmann: Fiction. My projections see five teams battling for the No. 3 and 4 spots in the West, with the Blazers being one of the weaker teams of those five. That would result in a less than 40 percent chance of having homecourt advantage in the first round, making it unlikely they'll advance.

Pelton: Fiction. Certainly, their chances are better than they were this time a year ago, when it proved to be fact. But I wouldn't put the Blazers among the top four teams in the West entering this season, and things get muddled outside of that group.

This entire section NEEDS to be posted on every bulletin board within 10 miles of One Center Court and the practice facility.

They are saying making the second round last year was a fluke, nothing more than dumb luck and the team isn't goo enough to make it back to the second round this year. But apparently UTA, who hasn't made the playoffs in five years is a shoo-in to make the second round because they got George Hill, Fat Boris Diaw and Iso Joe Johnson.

BNM
 
who is englemman????? if you are that out of touch with a team than ask someone else to take your spot in this discussion. ive never seen such out of touch takes....if they can trade for another combo gaurd???? delevadova and dudley?????????????
 
Apparently, 31-year old Jared Dudley, who played the same minutes as Allen Crabbe, but scored, 22.3% fewer points and had a lower PER, and Matthew Dellavedova and his 11.3 PER are the only things keeping us from being a powerhouse in the West.

Damn, I sure am glad MIL isn't in the West, or the "experts" would be picking them to finish ahead of us, too.

BNM
 
Yes, because this team has such HORRIBLE chemistry. Did Chad Ford watch this team play even once last year?

This entire section NEEDS to be posted on every bulletin board within 10 miles of One Center Court and the practice facility.

BNM

Ford: Are there enough shots for Damian Lillard, C.J. McCollum, Turner and Crabbe? They want to match the firepower of the Warriors, but I think there could be some major chemistry issues.


I have never been a fan of Chad Ford. Not sure why he gets paid.
This statement is ridiculous because it implies that all 4 will play together. Therefore are 3 shooters too many for a team to have on the court at the same time? Of course not. You need at least 3.
 
http://insider.espn.com/nba/insider...5-preview-damian-lillard-cj-mccollum-more-nba

Five of their writers answering questions about our boys.....
Arnovitz, Verrier, Ford, Engelman and Pelton.

2. What is the biggest issue facing the Blazers this season?
Arnovitz: The 20th-ranked defense from a year ago needs to stiffen this season for Portland to take a big leap forward. The Blazers are confident that the continuity of the roster, coupled with another year of seasoning, should push them firmly up the ledger. Hassan Whiteside would've provided the rim protection the Trail Blazers covet, but such is life at the free-agency bazaar.

Ford: Are there enough shots for Damian Lillard, C.J. McCollum, Turner and Crabbe? They want to match the firepower of the Warriors, but I think there could be some major chemistry issues.

Verrier: Defense. The Blazers proved last postseason that they have the scoring punch to trade blows with any team, but it will be hard to match the same deep run in a top-heavy West with a bottom-third defense. It doesn't help that Festus Ezeli, who figured to provide some sorely needed rim protection, has yet to suit up in preseason because of a knee injury.

Engelmann: Point guard depth is an issue. The only true PG on the roster, besides Lillard, is Shabazz Napier, who recorded a -4.4 RPM last season, good for bottom 25 in the league. Yes, McCollum and Turner can handle the ball-handling duties, but Napier has looked almost useless in all other facets of the game as well.

Pelton: Expectations. As noted on the Lakers' broadcast earlier this week, last season was actually the second-worst of the strong Neil Olshey/Terry Stotts era in Portland, but it felt like a huge win because virtually nobody saw it coming. If the Blazers win 44 games again, it will be seen as a disappointment.



3. What needs to happen for the Blazers to be a power in the West?

Pelton: I think they would need a third player to get in the All-Star discussion, presumably in the frontcourt. Realistically, Noah Vonleh is probably the best hope of that happening on the roster.

Engelmann: That window was open this past summer. But the Blazers, in my opinion, blew it when they signed Crabbe and Turner to a combined $145M. Had they used the money to sign Jared Dudley and Matthew Dellavedovainstead, I'd declare them a powerhouse now. As it is, they probably have to hope for further internal growth.

Arnovitz: Pristine health and exceptional progress in the development of at least one or two of their young players. If Crabbe can shoot 42 percent from deep and grow into a rugged wing defender, if Aminu can learn to initiate offense from the wing and continues to hone his shot, if Leonard returns to 50-40-90 form, you can imagine a scenario in which Portland racks up a win total in the 50 range -- but that's a lot of stars to align.

Ford: They are right there with the Spurs, Jazz and Clippers, in my opinion -- all vying for second place in the West. I'd put them fifth, but if their big scorers are all healthy, they can put up points with anyone.

Verrier: A trade for a high-level difference-maker. Portland is deservedly brimming with hope. Its team is young and stretchy and plays aesthetically pleasing basketball. Lillard is a snarly brand of superstar you can get behind. But in an era of super teams, the Blazers appear destined for a Hawksian malaise when they bump their head on their current ceiling once or twice.



4. What trade would make the most sense for the Blazers?
Arnovitz: Portland's brass would ideally like to continue developing its assets and, at the optimal time, aggregate them to acquire a big gun. The elephant in Rip City is whether one of those pieces could ever be McCollum, the NBA's reigning Most Improved Player, who is adored by his teammates, the Blazers' staff and the fan base alike. If the Trail Blazers found an opportunity, would they move him? At present, that's one of the most closely held secrets in the NBA.

Verrier: A swing for the fences. With their cadre of above-average young 'uns and all of their future first-rounders (plus Cleveland's in 2018), the Blazers can put together one of the more appealing packages for a disgruntled star, especially if they're willing to part with C.J. McCollum. I'm not sure of DeMarcus Cousins' interest in craft beer, but a team buoyed by Lillard and an All-Star big man was a serious threat in the West just two years ago (before an injury robbed them of Wes Matthews).

Engelmann: Besides Lillard and McCollum, I doubt the Blazers would get much in return for most players on their roster. They own the Cavs' 2018 1st-rounder, so maybe they can package that with one of their own to create an enticing package. Getting a decent combo guard would help tremendously.

Ford: I think finding a swap for Turner or Crabbe that brought back a more dominant big would give them more balance. They need the equivalent of a Draymond Green-type player right now -- a versatile, multipositional big who can stretch the floor and protect the rim (thought that won't be easy to get). Meyers Leonard and Mason Plumlee are solid, but they could use an upgrade.

Pelton: Even if Festus Ezeli can't give the Blazers regular contributions due to his knee injuries, there's still a crowd up front now that Al-Farouq Aminu is a full-time power forward. So it's probably Portland dealing one of its big men -- either Ed Davis, the oldest player in the group, or Mason Plumlee instead of signing him to a new, more lucrative contract.


5. Fact or Fiction: The Blazers will make the Western Conference final four.
Arnovitz: Fiction, for no other reason that the field is large and the Jazz might be just a smidge better this season. That said, the Trail Blazers show up for big games and cut their teeth during a magical run last spring. In short, it's improbable, but certainly not unfathomable.

Verrier: Fiction. The Blazers should again be in the middle of the traffic jam for the bottom half of the West's playoff bracket, but it's hard envisioning an encore with as much gusto considering last year's path to the second round was cleared by injuries to their opposition's two best players.

Ford: Fiction. I have them fifth in the West, but the distance between them, the Jazz and the Clippers is very short.

Engelmann: Fiction. My projections see five teams battling for the No. 3 and 4 spots in the West, with the Blazers being one of the weaker teams of those five. That would result in a less than 40 percent chance of having homecourt advantage in the first round, making it unlikely they'll advance.

Pelton: Fiction. Certainly, their chances are better than they were this time a year ago, when it proved to be fact. But I wouldn't put the Blazers among the top four teams in the West entering this season, and things get muddled outside of that group.

Insiders? They call themselves insiders? They don't know Jack shit. There are no chemistry problems. Shit, we probably have the best chemistry right now in the league.
Delavedova and Dudley...we'd be a powerhouse of only we just signed them instead of Crabbe and Turner? What utter fucking horse shit.

5th place....behind Utah... what the he'll makes Utah better than the Blazers?

The Blazers will be in the top four and will make the western confrence finals. The four of them can shove their fiction up their asses.

Let'em doubt us again! It's time to destroy!
 
MM's not here at the moment, so I need to fill that slot for him...

So, if Ford and Engelmann had said something nice about the Blazers, their expert opinion would be used to justify everyone's excitement about this season, but since they're not putting the Blazers in the WCF, they're hacks who should be fired?

So predictable...

[/mediocreman]
 
I'm disappointed in Pelton. He actually goes to every home game. He has been to practices. He has seen first hand how much chemistry matters, and how much better Dame has gotten.

But he is also a stats junkie and peddles that RPM shit like no other.

Can't wait to prove these dudes wrong again.
 
MM's not here at the moment, so I need to fill that slot for him...

So, if Ford and Engelmann had said something nice about the Blazers, their expert opinion would be used to justify everyone's excitement about this season, but since they're not putting the Blazers in the WCF, they're hacks who should be fired?

So predictable...

[/mediocreman]

You're hired!
 
Last edited:
Ford: Are there enough shots for Damian Lillard, C.J. McCollum, Turner and Crabbe? They want to match the firepower of the Warriors, but I think there could be some major chemistry issues.


I have never been a fan of Chad Ford. Not sure why he gets paid.
This statement is ridiculous because it implies that all 4 will play together. Therefore are 3 shooters too many for a team to have on the court at the same time? Of course not. You need at least 3.

This also implies that these are selfish players only concerned about getting their own shots. Lillard, McCollum and Turner averaged a combined 15.5 apg last season and all had AST% greater than 20% (33.6 for Lillard, 23.9 for Turner and 21.6 for McCollum). There will be plenty of ball movement, which will result in plenty of open looks for everyone.

Yet another national writer who has no clue why POR signed Evan Turner.

BNM
 
Again they sleep on what our staff does with development of players....Napier will improve here as will Turner...they can revisit this around Christmas and tell me how weak or guard rotation and rim protection is then...
 
I am opening up a twitter account just for the sole purpose of trolling ford and englemann throughout the season. These predictions are outright unjust, uneducated and insulting. I guess they are getting the reaction and attention they were driving for when written.
 
Engelmann: Point guard depth is an issue. The only true PG on the roster, besides Lillard, is Shabazz Napier, who recorded a -4.4 RPM last season, good for bottom 25 in the league. Yes, McCollum and Turner can handle the ball-handling duties, but Napier has looked almost useless in all other facets of the game as well.

Hahaahhah
 
Again they sleep on what our staff does with development of players....Napier will improve here as will Turner...they can revisit this around Christmas and tell me how weak or guard rotation and rim protection is then...

 
I find it funny that the Thunder got worse, the Clippers didn't improve at all, and the Spurs lost their heart and soul.... but our team that finished 5th last year, and added some solid pieces in Turner and Ezeli without giving up any of or core..... won't be in the top 4.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top