Even more proof

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Definition8

Back and better than ever
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
4
Likes
1
Points
3
that what I posted earlier is 100% true...



Dude should just be happy to be there.
 
that what I posted earlier is 100% true...



Dude should just be happy to be there.


you are aware of what the word "proof" actually means, right?
 
Wait. I want to be clear on something.

The reason for your original post was to bag on Aldridge for always wanting things to come easy. For not having fire, for not developing just to develop (which he did), for not having the will and makeup to be the number one guy on a championship team.

But then you say he should just be happy to be at the all-star game, and not want to play more minutes?

This doesn't even make sense.
 
Wait. I want to be clear on something.

The reason for your original post was to bag on Aldridge for always wanting things to come easy. For not having fire, for not developing just to develop (which he did), for not having the will and makeup to be the number one guy on a championship team.

But then you say he should just be happy to be at the all-star game, and not want to play more minutes?

This doesn't even make sense.

If you didn't pay attention to O-Live, then I see why it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, I've seen Def8's posts over there. He really doesn't make a lot of sense. But whatevs! You guys let me come and post here! :P
 
If you didn't pay attention to O-Live, then I see why it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, I've seen Def8's posts over there. He really doesn't make a lot of sense. But whatevs! You guys let me come and post here! :P

yeah, but you're a homer. He's a troll. There's a difference.
 
If you didn't pay attention to O-Live, then I see why it doesn't make sense. Unfortunately, I've seen Def8's posts over there. He really doesn't make a lot of sense. But whatevs! You guys let me come and post here! :P

We let you come and post here because you post pictures of your hot girlfriend, and that one babe with the apple.

which, btw, thanks for the private pictures, those should've been illegal. That barely passes for clothing in my books!
 
that what I posted earlier is 100% true...



Dude should just be happy to be there.


Not getting how LMA wanting more minutes for an exhibition game means he wants things to be "easy".

Sly, if this dude is your OLive troll who you persuaded to come to S2, please just bring back MIXUM and give us somebody at least worthy of trolling the community.

This guy is boring me.
 
What else to expect. The coach was Scott Brooks of OKC giving Westbrook 24 minutes and Durant 37 minutes.
 
What else to expect. The coach was Scott Brooks of OKC giving Westbrook 24 minutes and Durant 37 minutes.

37 minutes in an All-Star game is a crime. I like Durant, but he should have begged his douchebag coach to let him rest a bit. Plus, Westbrook got 28 minutes, not 24.

Simply amazing. What was Brooks thinking?
 
Who the hell told this fool to come here?

People left OLive for a reason, and this guy was one of them.
 
We let you come and post here because you post pictures of your hot girlfriend, and that one babe with the apple.

which, btw, thanks for the private pictures, those should've been illegal. That barely passes for clothing in my books!

Lol
 
37 minutes in an All-Star game is a crime. I like Durant, but he should have begged his douchebag coach to let him rest a bit. Plus, Westbrook got 28 minutes, not 24.

Simply amazing. What was Brooks thinking?

They even said on TNT that Durant told his coach that he wanted to play 40 minutes because they don't play again until Wednesday. Such bullshit.
 
I ran a spreadsheet to find who led in efficiency points per minute. Efficiency points = points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks - turnovers - missed FG - missed FT. Then divide by minutes played. The players below .50 sucked and didn't deserve the minutes they got.

WEST
1.11 Love
.92 Durant
.90 Griffin
.75 Parker
.71 Westbrook
.65 Paul
.60 Bryant
.60 Nash
.50 Bynum
.50 Nowitzki
.30 Aldridge
.21 Gasol

EAST
1.39 Williams, Deron
1.29 Iguodala
1.16 James
1.15 Wade
.78 Rose
.67 Anthony
.52 Howard
.50 Hibbert
.38 Rondo
.30 Bosh
-.17 Deng
-.27 Pierce
 
I ran a spreadsheet to find who led in efficiency points per minute. Efficiency points = points + rebounds + assists + steals + blocks - turnovers - missed FG - missed FT. Then divide by minutes played. The players below .50 sucked and didn't deserve the minutes they got.

WEST
1.11 Love
.92 Durant
.90 Griffin
.75 Parker
.71 Westbrook
.65 Paul
.60 Bryant
.60 Nash
.50 Bynum
.50 Nowitzki
.30 Aldridge
.21 Gasol

EAST
1.39 Williams, Deron
1.29 Iguodala
1.16 James
1.15 Wade
.78 Rose
.67 Anthony
.52 Howard
.50 Hibbert
.38 Rondo
.30 Bosh
-.17 Deng
-.27 Pierce

You need a better life, bro.
 
Sometimes you get SO MAD, doggone it.
 
can we make a new law?

We can call it the Olive exclusion act?

We have enough of them, we don't need anymore.
 
Not getting how LMA wanting more minutes for an exhibition game means he wants things to be "easy".

Sly, if this dude is your OLive troll who you persuaded to come to S2, please just bring back MIXUM and give us somebody at least worthy of trolling the community.

This guy is boring me.

Mixum has been back for some time now.
 
I thought the stimulating Blazer basketball discussions we have here would be enough to tone down his O-live rhetoric. When you meet him in person he's a really nice guy, basketball forums must bring out the worst in him, lol.
 
Last edited:
that what I posted earlier is 100% true...



Dude should just be happy to be there.


Reporter: "Did you expect to play more minutes?"

Adridge: "Definitely"

Yup, absolute proof that he's a second fiddle, 4th chair banana ... no wait, I mean total proof that he should just be happy to be there ... wait ... goddammit, I'm so confused right now.
 
interesting how banning apparently doesn't actually mean "banned"

If you read your moderator manual you would see that all we can do is ban someone's moniker and IP Address. If a person moves or changes internet providers they get a new IP address, are free to create a new moniker and post here again.
 
If you read your moderator manual you would see that all we can do is ban someone's moniker and IP Address. If a person moves or changes internet providers they get a new IP address, are free to create a new moniker and post here again.

And if you figure out it's them, ban them again.

Is that what you did?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top