BigGameDamian
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2012
- Messages
- 33,929
- Likes
- 13,761
- Points
- 113
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

And yet, Portland is a boring place players don't like frequent.
I'm getting mixed signals.![]()
Traffic sucks, but thats about it. and the rain has been a bit excessive this year, but thats the NW.
Traffic sucks, but thats about it. and the rain has been a bit excessive this year, but thats the NW.
Hah, if you think Portland traffic is bad, I'm guessing you've never lived in Seattle or Southern California.
The rain keeps things lush and green, and it beats shoveling snow (other Northern cities) or wildfires (Southern California). Plus, we have the most perfect summers I have ever seen.
BNM
Go visit Seattle,LA.,SF....... their traffic is much worse.Traffic sucks, but thats about it. and the rain has been a bit excessive this year, but thats the NW.
Go visit Seattle,LA.,SF....... their traffic is much worse.
I blame how shitty our interstate system is once you get into the cityAgain, Not really.... and when you consider per capita???
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/20/worst-traffic-top-10-congested-u-s-cities/
Per capita is like per 36 min.....useless stat. I wait in traffic longer in the above mentioned cities than I do in P-Town. That's all I know.Again, Not really.... and when you consider per capita???
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/20/worst-traffic-top-10-congested-u-s-cities/
And yet, Portland is a boring place players don't like frequent.
I'm getting mixed signals.![]()
Link?Almost like you can't generalize about people, and each one is an entity deserving of their own opinions and respect?
I thought Scottie Pippen had a house in Portland as well? Rasheed? Damon?
Per capita is like per 36 min.....useless stat. I wait in traffic longer in the above mentioned cities than I do in P-Town. That's all I know.
Again, Not really.... and when you consider per capita???
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/02/20/worst-traffic-top-10-congested-u-s-cities/
And yet, Portland is a boring place players don't like frequent.
I'm getting mixed signals.![]()
Per capita traffic? What's that? Those cities have worse traffic precisely because they have more people.
I lived in Seattle before I moved to Portland. Both cities have grown considerably in the time I've been here, but Seattle rush hour traffic was worse 28 years ago than Portland's is today. Seattle has no urban growth boundary and poor planning that has led to horrible sprawl. The average lot size up there is much bigger than it is in Portland, and while that sounds nice at first, it creates a transportation nightmare in a large urban area. With everyone so spread out, you can't effectively address your traffic problem through the use of efficient public transportation. Throw in the bottlenecks caused by all the large bodies of water that commuters have to either drive across or around and traffic is an absolute nightmare. Beautiful city, but traffic flat out sucks.
And don't get me started on parking in downtown Seattle...
When we lived in Seattle, we were in the 'burbs and my wife worked in downtown Seattle. On a good day, her commute was 45 minutes each way (on a bad day, an hour and 15 minutes each way). When we moved to Portland, we also lived in the 'burbs and she worked in downtown Portland. On a bad day, her commute was 20 minutes. Of course, being in the 'burbs in Portland means you are physically closer to downtown, but that's the point. In Seattle, everything is so spread out, going into the city from the suburbs is a major undertaking (be sure you have a full tank of gas and the kids have used the restroom). Part of that is geography, but a large part of it is poor urban planning.
About six years after we moved here, we had an opportunity to move back to Seattle (we both had job offers up there). One weekend visit was all it took to convince us it would be a move backwards. Traffic was horrible, and at the time, the cost of a house in the Seattle area was about 50% more than a comparable house in Portland. The difference in housing costs isn't as great as it was then, and Portland traffic has gotten worse than it was 20 years ago, but it's not like Seattle traffic has gotten any better.
I will probably move someplace warm and sunny when I retire, but as far as a place to live from my mid-20s through my mid-50s, and a place to raise my kids, I can't think of a better place than Portland, OR.
BNM
Per capita is not like a per 36. Its a real stat based on population. If you have 1 million people trying to drive on 1000 miles of road, that is different than 100,000 trying to drive on the same amount of road. Or better yet, whats a better situation? 100 cars on the road at once with 25 miles to drive on one road, or 1000 cars on the road with 250 miles to drive on one road?
Per capita is an absolute valid stat for traffic.
I was typing my response when you posted this. It's not just about population. It's about housing density and urban planning. Portland was at the forefront of the New Urban Planning movement. Seattle was a joke. They let the developers do whatever they wanted. That's what led to ridiculous, out of control, urban sprawl, which has made traffic a mess and efficient public transportation all but impossible.
BNM
