F*** YOU NATE MCMILLAN

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
OneSport3

OneSport3

The Knowledge Hoarder
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
3,287
Likes
5,696
Points
113
Get over your stupid man crush on Steve Blake! What's the point of of getting Andre Miller if we're not going to play him down the stretch!???
 
Are you really complaining that Blake got 10 more mins and nearly closed the game for us? Blake provides us something Andre can't.....lockdown D. Learn the game, then post.
 
toutlaw25 said:
Are you really complaining that Blake got 10 more mins and nearly closed the game for us? Blake provides us something Andre can't.....lockdown D. Learn the game, then post.
Click to expand...

:biglaugh:

:sigh:
 
Was it just me, or did going to that zone defense kill us? It seemed like every time we went to it they made a run..
 
VanillaGorilla said:
Was it just me, or did going to that zone defense kill us? It seemed like every time we went to it they made a run..
Click to expand...

Yep--hated the zone. Hated the fact that Blake was the reason for the zone. Hated Blake being out there. :confused:
 
Miller, Blake and Roy makes no sense for the end. Blake is only in there to be able to shoot three's, and Rudy could do that just as well or better.

I do, however, understand Blake, Fernandez, Roy, because in some situations we need two guys that can hit a three after a kickout..
 
VanillaGorilla said:
Miller, Blake and Roy makes no sense for the end. Blake is only in there to be able to shoot three's, and Rudy could do that just as well or better.

I do, however, understand Blake, Fernandez, Roy, because in some situations we need two guys that can hit a three after a kickout..
Click to expand...

I'd rather have Fernandez, Roy, and Webster, because Martell is just as capable of bricking crunchtime 3's as Blanky is, but he is at least capable of guarding SF's man-to-man.
 
Outlaw out, Blake and Nate get the derision after an OT loss in the 5th game in 7 days on the road.

Some of you are predictable to a fault. Why even watch the team play? It just can't be fun to be so negative, can it?
 
Uther TheGardener said:
hmmm show casing? why does nate have love affiars with playing certain players?
Click to expand...

Why do posters here use over-dramatic terms to describe the relationship between a coach they don't like and certain players they don't like? :dunno:
 
"Blanky" +9 for the game.

Miller -2 for the game. :dunno:
 
PapaG said:
Outlaw out, Blake and Nate get the derision after an OT loss in the 5th game in 7 days on the road.

Some of you are predictable to a fault. Why even watch the team play? It just can't be fun to be so negative, can it?
Click to expand...

If you think the Blake and Nate criticism is just because of one game, you are mistaken. I just really didn't like the zone defense and I would assume that was Nate's decision.

I don't think you were considering me one of these negative people, cause I don't consider myself negative at all, but still the Blake and Nate criticizers keep their opinions.. It's not just because of this game.
 
VanillaGorilla said:
If you think the Blake and Nate criticism is just because of one game, you are mistaken. I just really didn't like the zone defense and I would assume that was Nate's decision.

I don't think you were considering me one of these negative people, cause I don't consider myself negative at all, but still the Blake and Nate criticizers keep their opinions.. It's not just because of this game.
Click to expand...

Well, not knowing your posting past, I won't dispute that fact. But some posters in this thread have bemoaned the Blazers' lack of perimeter defense. One way to neutralize that is to play a zone. That said, Oden still got into foul trouble and was outplayed by Horford.
 
I don't think Oden was in foul trouble. He ended with 5, but he was never really taken out of the game because of fouls.
 
VanillaGorilla said:
If you think the Blake and Nate criticism is just because of one game, you are mistaken. I just really didn't like the zone defense and I would assume that was Nate's decision.

I don't think you were considering me one of these negative people, cause I don't consider myself negative at all, but still the Blake and Nate criticizers keep their opinions.. It's not just because of this game.
Click to expand...

Well, to be honest, I can understand some of the criticism but man is it getting old. Yeah, Blake is slumping badly. But maybe we should just make sticky thread where people who hate him can voice there permanent displeasure, like a wailing wall.

I thought MM's harping on Nate in every thread and every post was old but sheesh..now there are threads devoted to bashing on Blake popping up. It's like some posters want him to fail and as soon as he does anything wrong they jump all over him. God forbid he was with the other team the way you guys treat our team. You'd think we all lived in Pittsburgh or something.

Blake is playing, get over it. If you don't like it go write Nate and tell him what an assclown he is (that's just for you MM). Call up the radio show, tell them what an assclown Nate is and what a butt pirate Blake is. Maybe there will be such an outpouring of hatred that Nate benches Blake. Then you can draw lots to see who the next player is you nail to the cross after every game.
 
Last edited:
B-Roy said:
I don't think Oden was in foul trouble. He ended with 5, but he was never really taken out of the game because of fouls.
Click to expand...

Makes it even more troubling that he was outplayed by Horford, IMO.
 
PapaG said:
Well, not knowing your posting past, I won't dispute that fact. But some posters in this thread have bemoaned the Blazers' lack of perimeter defense. One way to neutralize that is to play a zone. That said, Oden still got into foul trouble and was outplayed by Horford.
Click to expand...

I don't think Oden was in foul trouble either.. didn't he get his 4th in OT? And the Hawks got so many offensive rebounds because of that zone. That is the main reason I didn't like it.
 
VanillaGorilla said:
I don't think Oden was in foul trouble either.. didn't he get his 4th in OT? And the Hawks got so many offensive rebounds because of that zone. That is the main reason I didn't like it.
Click to expand...

So, Oden didn't get outplayed by Horford? :dunno:
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Yep--hated the zone. Hated the fact that Blake was the reason for the zone. Hated Blake being out there. :confused:
Click to expand...

Rudy is the reason we play zone...every time he is in the game we play zone at some point...You could say it's because he is good at playing passing lanes or you could say he can't play man defense to save his life.
 
Luther said:
Rudy is the reason we play zone...every time he is in the game we play zone at some point...You could say it's because he is good at playing passing lanes or you could say he can't play man defense to save his life.
Click to expand...

Stop it. It's Blake's fault (and Nate's). Oh, and Outlaw's as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top