Politics FAKE NEWS STILL GOING STRONG

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

The first and most effective tool of The Deep State has always been the media, and our government-owned media is of course the most corrupted.

U.S. Government Media Network Extols “Press Freedom” After Firing Journalists Over Soros Report
MAY 07, 2019

It’s ironic that, just weeks after firing journalists behind a broadcast critical of leftwing billionaire George Soros, the head of the U.S. government’s international media networks is proclaiming his support for “press freedom.” U.S. Agency for Global Media (USAGM) Chief John F. Lansing, an Obama appointee, issued a heartfelt statement a few days ago reaffirming his “commitment to the fundamental principles of press freedom.” In the document, titled “Fighting for press freedom, today and everyday,” Lansing assures the world that his agency “will continue to report the truth,” though it recently cost USAGM journalists their jobs. The occasion was World Press Freedom Day, celebrated on May 3, and Lansing expresses deep concern that his taxpayer-funded agency “continues to witness firsthand how a free and independent media is deteriorating worldwide.”

Posted on the agency’s website and disbursed worldwide, the document goes on to say “despite some very dark moments, we have not been silenced. We will continue to report the truth. We will continue to find new ways to get independent reporting and programming to global audiences who rely on it. And we will continue to carry through our mission to inform, engage, and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy. Today, and every day, I am proud to be part of this organization, and call these brave men and women colleagues, as we stand together for press freedom.”

Lansing conveniently omits that he recently utilized Stalinist techniques to retaliate against USAGM journalists and producers involved in the Soros piece. The Spanish-language segment aired in May 2018 on Television Martí and was available for months online until it caught the eye of a scandal-plagued senator tried for bribery and corruption. Eight reporters and editors at the publicly funded media outlet were terminated and, at the request of the disgraced senator, New Jersey Democrat Bob Menendez, Lansing ordered a review of all content to address “patterns of unethical, unprofessional, biased, or sub-standard journalism.” An employee at the Miami, Florida-based Martí headquarters said in a local newspaper report “the environment that has been created by the upper hierarchy of the Agency for Global Media is repressive. People write with fear. Adjectives are no longer used.”

Television Martí—and its radio counterpart—operate under the Office of Cuba Broadcasting (OCB) and comprise one of the USAGM’s five international multimedia networks. The others are Voice of America (VOA), Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty (RFE/RL), Radio Free Asia and Middle East Broadcasting. The media outlets get about $685 million a year from American taxpayers and reportedly reach 345 million people worldwide in 59 languages. The global media agency was created to counter disinformation spread by oppressive regimes abroad. The USAGM website states that its mission is “to inform, engage and connect people around the world in support of freedom and democracy.” Television and Radio Martí were created to promote freedom and democracy by providing the people of Cuba with objective news and information programming.

The Soros broadcast focused on his efforts to cripple sovereign governments in Latin America. Judicial Watch was cited as a source because it investigated State Department funding of Soros groups in Colombia and published a report on Soros’ initiatives to advance a radical globalist agenda in Guatemala. Judicial Watch also released a special report documenting the financial and staffing nexus between Soros’ Open Society Foundations (OSF) and the U.S. government. In that document, Judicial Watch connects the dots between U.S.-funded entities and OSF affiliates to further the Hungarian-born philanthropist’s agenda seeking to destabilize legitimate governments, erase national borders, target conservative politicians, finance civil unrest, subvert institutions of higher education, and orchestrate refugee crises for political gain. A few years ago Judicial Watch exposed a scheme in which the U.S. government spent millions of dollars to destabilize the democratically elected, center-right government in Macedonia by colluding with Soros’ OSF.

More than five months after the Spanish-language Soros broadcast aired on Television Martí, Menendez ordered Lansing to conduct an immediate investigation and the USAGM chief retaliated against his own staff for practicing the “press freedom” he defends weeks later. Menendez, who serves on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee despite his sordid history, blocked President Trump’s nomination last year to replace Lansing as USAGM chief so perhaps Lansing owed him. A few years ago, Menendez was charged with federal bribery and corruption stemming from his relationship with a crooked south Florida eye doctor that lavished him with cash, gifts and trips in exchange for political favors. The eye doctor, Salomon Melgen, got convicted of stealing $73 million from Medicare and was sentenced to 17 years in prison. Menendez got off because jurors were unable to reach a verdict and his trial ended in mistrial. His colleagues on the Senate Ethics Committee determined that the veteran lawmaker not only violated senate rules, but also federal law and applicable standards of conduct. In a public letter of admonition, the committee writes that over a six-year period Menendez knowingly and repeatedly accepted gifts of significant value from Melgen in violation of senate rules and federal law. “Additionally, while accepting these gifts, you used your position as a Member of the Senate to advance Dr. Melgen’s personal and business interests,” the committee writes.
 
Are we back to this? Don't you think it's time to move on to something more productive?

Edit:
1. It's Fox News;
2. You've gotta sit through half a minute of commercial crap;
3. It tells you virtually nothing.

You realize anyone reading it knows you're just trolling, right?

It's a clear and concise article about a lawsuit filed in Federal Court against a proven source of fake news, for deliberately smearing an innocent teenager.

We all know you understand that and are simply posting crap.
 
You realize anyone reading it knows you're just trolling, right?

It's a clear and concise article about a lawsuit filed in Federal Court against a proven source of fake news, for deliberately smearing an innocent teenager.

It's Fox News, it may be concise but it's anything but clear.

As for the trolling crap, no one has accused me of trolling while a multitude have singled you out for that honor. I tell you what, you don't accuse me of trolling and I won't join the chorus of others who accuse you of trolling.

All I really ever want from you is that you try using a credible source. It seems like you're at a loss for words without Fox News.
 
MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski fails to get panel to bash Trump during Memorial Day segment
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski made a failed attempt on Monday morning to rile up her "Morning Joe" panel to bash President Trump on a segment dedicated to Memorial Day.

In the segment, Brzezinski began by asking the "reflections" of MSNBC commentator Mike Barnicle by invoking Trump's deployment of troops at the southern border.

“I want to ask you what your reflections are during this time in terms of our attitudes in America, our knowledge and our understanding of people who serve in the military, who serve multiple tours of duty, who have taken part in wars on behalf of this country, and also, are being deployed by this President by -- let’s say maybe perhaps controversial means in terms of their deployments at the southern border for caravans that are coming in. It’s a convoluting time, is it not?” Brzezinski said.

Barnicle responded by expressing a "sadness" that now surrounds Memorial Day, one that had nothing to do with the president.

“There’s a certain sadness with me, about Memorial Day, because you think of the word memorial, and part of that word incorporates memory,” Barnicle told Brzezinski. He talked about the tendency to forget on a day dedicated to remembrance, about the cultural steps backward of technological steps forward like Twitter, how it used to be there was almost no one in America whose life hadn’t been touched by the loss of an American servicemember."

Brzezinski then pivoted to SiriusXM host and combat veteran Paul Rieckhoff in hopes that he would take the opportunity to slam Trump. He didn't.

“And Paul, I would love for you to reflect on what Mike Barnicle just said,” Brzezinski told Rieckhoff, “And also, given the work that you have done, how you’re feeling about the way the military perhaps is beings used by this presidency? Does it really match their role in history?”

"I think sadly that's right, Mika, but I think as a starting point Memorial Day still can be a time where we come together as a nation at this time when we are so divided,” Rieckhoff responded. "Even if you take just one minute on the a moment of silence... just take one minute and reflect on someone that you know that has died or even if you don't know someone that has died, someone that has died on your behalf to give you the opportunity to go have a barbeque or go to the beach..."
 
I just about don't watch TV during this month and Memorial Day, it always reminds me of the Battle for Iwo Jima. I had just concluded about
Memorial day 1945. I was old enough to know about the war and even followed it some over the radio and Warner Path News at the movies.
News from Iwo Jima made me acutely aware of the war. I hate to see jerks like Joe Scarrbough on TV talking some shit or other this time of year. Silly I know, but it is.

You never hear the real story about battles and fuck ups like Iwo Jima. But Wiki does now gets close.

"After the heavy losses incurred in the battle, the strategic value of the island became controversial. It was useless to the U.S. Army as a staging base and useless to the U.S. Navy as a fleet base.[6] However, Navy Seabees rebuilt the landing strips, which were used as emergency landing strips for USAAF B-29s.[7]"

Not exactly grand historical justification for taking on the battle that brought the most Casualties ever to the US Marine Corp. What goes unsaid in this description of a controversial issue, is the B29 force did not even have as many men to save as the Marines (and Sailor) that were lost. The whole force was only about a third the size of the number casualties taken to capture the friggin island. What fucking plan!

A hugh reason I like Trump, I can not see him wasting good troops in stupid battles like his predecessors in history. Iwo being a massive and terrible example.
 
I just about don't watch TV during this month and Memorial Day, it always reminds me of the Battle for Iwo Jima. I had just concluded about
Memorial day 1945. I was old enough to know about the war and even followed it some over the radio and Warner Path News at the movies.
News from Iwo Jima made me acutely aware of the war. I hate to see jerks like Joe Scarrbough on TV talking some shit or other this time of year. Silly I know, but it is.

You never hear the real story about battles and fuck ups like Iwo Jima. But Wiki does now gets close.

"After the heavy losses incurred in the battle, the strategic value of the island became controversial. It was useless to the U.S. Army as a staging base and useless to the U.S. Navy as a fleet base.[6] However, Navy Seabees rebuilt the landing strips, which were used as emergency landing strips for USAAF B-29s.[7]"

Not exactly grand historical justification for taking on the battle that brought the most Casualties ever to the US Marine Corp. What goes unsaid in this description of a controversial issue, is the B29 force did not even have as many men to save as the Marines (and Sailor) that were lost. The whole force was only about a third the size of the number casualties taken to capture the friggin island. What fucking plan!

A hugh reason I like Trump, I can not see him wasting good troops in stupid battles like his predecessors in history. Iwo being a massive and terrible example.
Happy Memorial Day
 
Happy Memorial Day

@MarAzul "this is why i love trump" lmao

Spot on! Man have you been duped. Trump is handling this the right way and sure as hell about time.

Think about it. Think about that war. Roosevelt called for unconditional surrender as his vision of what Victory would look like.
Well our Nation pursued that awful vision right down to the end. When the Battle of Iwo Jima took place, Japan essentially had no Navy
to meet the US fleet. Our B29s flew a 1000 strong daily over Japan, burning one or more civilian cities after the other. They had no Airforce
to come up and meet the big bombers.

We wasted 28000 Casualties at Iwo but we killed ever Jap on the island. We continued this shit for 6 more months, killing millions.
I have long since forgive Japan for starting that war that we finished with an embarrassing zeal. The Japanese people did not start that war
a few dumb ass politicians did. But I don't know that their dumb ass politician were any worse than our dumb ass leader that called for
Unconditional surrender, and let his wild ass General Curtis Lemay loose on the Civilian population of Japan, fire bombing and killing millions of them as if he were on a mission of sanctioned genocide.

I am pleased to see President Trump welcome the Japaneses people back with the human race.
PS, I lost people in that war, but I do not blame the Japanese people, having long since given up that pain.
 
I have come to the conclusion that only a feeling Democrat (sometime a Rino) will find the need to appear tough and even heartless.
Calling for unconditional surrender is one example of this appearance pretense. How foolish can you get? Where heartless in never needed,
it will never replace logic. I expect even the more ardent of Dems in S2 can understand this logic.
 
Spot on! Man have you been duped. Trump is handling this the right way and sure as hell about time.

Think about it. Think about that war. Roosevelt called for unconditional surrender as his vision of what Victory would look like.
Well our Nation pursued that awful vision right down to the end. When the Battle of Iwo Jima took place, Japan essentially had no Navy
to meet the US fleet. Our B29s flew a 1000 strong daily over Japan, burning one or more civilian cities after the other. They had no Airforce
to come up and meet the big bombers.

We wasted 28000 Casualties at Iwo but we killed ever Jap on the island. We continued this shit for 6 more months, killing millions.
I have long since forgive Japan for starting that war that we finished with an embarrassing zeal. The Japanese people did not start that war
a few dumb ass politicians did. But I don't know that their dumb ass politician were any worse than our dumb ass leader that called for
Unconditional surrender, and let his wild ass General Curtis Lemay loose on the Civilian population of Japan, fire bombing and killing millions of them as if he were on a mission of sanctioned genocide.

I am pleased to see President Trump welcome the Japaneses people back with the human race.
PS, I lost people in that war, but I do not blame the Japanese people, having long since given up that pain.
This is psychopathic
 
MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski fails to get panel to bash Trump during Memorial Day segment
By Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski made a failed attempt on Monday morning to rile up her "Morning Joe" panel to bash President Trump on a segment dedicated to Memorial Day.

In the segment, Brzezinski began by asking the "reflections" of MSNBC commentator Mike Barnicle by invoking Trump's deployment of troops at the southern border.

“I want to ask you what your reflections are during this time in terms of our attitudes in America, our knowledge and our understanding of people who serve in the military, who serve multiple tours of duty, who have taken part in wars on behalf of this country, and also, are being deployed by this President by -- let’s say maybe perhaps controversial means in terms of their deployments at the southern border for caravans that are coming in. It’s a convoluting time, is it not?” Brzezinski said.

Barnicle responded by expressing a "sadness" that now surrounds Memorial Day, one that had nothing to do with the president.

“There’s a certain sadness with me, about Memorial Day, because you think of the word memorial, and part of that word incorporates memory,” Barnicle told Brzezinski. He talked about the tendency to forget on a day dedicated to remembrance, about the cultural steps backward of technological steps forward like Twitter, how it used to be there was almost no one in America whose life hadn’t been touched by the loss of an American servicemember."

Brzezinski then pivoted to SiriusXM host and combat veteran Paul Rieckhoff in hopes that he would take the opportunity to slam Trump. He didn't.

“And Paul, I would love for you to reflect on what Mike Barnicle just said,” Brzezinski told Rieckhoff, “And also, given the work that you have done, how you’re feeling about the way the military perhaps is beings used by this presidency? Does it really match their role in history?”

"I think sadly that's right, Mika, but I think as a starting point Memorial Day still can be a time where we come together as a nation at this time when we are so divided,” Rieckhoff responded. "Even if you take just one minute on the a moment of silence... just take one minute and reflect on someone that you know that has died or even if you don't know someone that has died, someone that has died on your behalf to give you the opportunity to go have a barbeque or go to the beach..."
Fox (entertainment) News, eh. Do you ever receive any credible news sources or is it all fantasy entertainment?
 
The first time I was in Kagoshima, it still looked like this;
kagoshima_1945.jpg

We took on fuel there, but it was no place for liberty.
 

Attachments

  • kagoshima_1945.jpg
    kagoshima_1945.jpg
    25.2 KB · Views: 96
Press trashes Trump’s trip over his shots at those denouncing him

By Howard Kurtz | Fox News
'MediaBuzz' host Howard Kurtz weighs in on the mainstream media and Democratic presidential candidates criticizing President Trump's visits to Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas.

The mainstream media couldn’t stand Donald Trump’s trip to El Paso and Dayton.

The coverage was overwhelmingly negative, going far beyond the Trump-isn’t-very-empathetic reviews he got when, for instance, he was tossing paper towels into a crowd after the Puerto Rican hurricane.

This was more of an indictment: the president made things worse in the wake of two mass shootings.

Now I’ll be the first to say it would have been better if Trump had put his phone away on Wednesday.

And there is no question that his past divisive rhetoric is a legitimate aspect of the story.

But many of the stories and segments were truly striking in their one-sidedness.

They conveyed the impression that only Trump had fouled the atmosphere with partisan swipes and Twitter taunts.

But in most of these instances, Trump was responding to slashing attacks from those he wound up criticizing. And yet that was repeatedly downplayed or dismissed.


It almost seems as if it’s acceptable for the president’s opponents to call him a white supremacist who is fomenting and condoning mass violence, but if he defends himself, he’s committed some awful breach of public decorum. Perhaps some journalists see the anti-Trump rhetoric as justified, and therefore acceptable?

Sure, you can say, he’s the president and should rise above the attacks in the interest of national unity. But why aren’t the critics held to a similar standard?

The New York Times headline captured the media zeitgeist:

“Trump Uses a Day of Healing to Deepen the Nation’s Divisions.”

See? It’s all his fault.

A “day intended to show compassion,” the paper says, “quickly devolved into an occasion for anger-fueled broadsides against Democrats and the news media.”

The “plan went awry” before the first flight, the Times says, when Trump tweeted at "Beto (phony name to indicate Hispanic heritage) O’Rourke," saying he was polling at 1 percent in the Democratic race and should “be quiet.”

But the former El Paso congressman, trying to revive his campaign, has repeatedly slammed Trump as a white supremacist and suggested he is condoning mass violence. Shouldn’t that be mentioned right away?


The Times story also notes that Trump took a whack at Joe Biden, but at least points out that the former VP gave a speech that same day accusing the president of having “fanned the flames of white supremacy.” In fact, the speech was a full-throated attack on Trump’s “toxic tongue”:

“How far is it from Trump’s saying this ‘is an invasion’ to the shooter in El Paso declaring ‘his attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas?’ Not far at all,” Biden said.

The Democratic front-runner has every right to make his case, but isn’t he being divisive as well?


Trump’s tweeted response: “Watching Sleepy Joe Biden making a speech. Sooo Boring! The LameStream Media will die in the ratings and clicks with this guy.”

The Washington Post led its story this way:

“On a day when President Trump vowed to tone down his rhetoric and help the country heal following two mass slayings, he did the opposite — lacing his visits Wednesday to El Paso and Dayton, Ohio, with a flurry of attacks on local leaders and memorializing his trips with grinning thumbs-up photos.”

The president did come on strong after his meeting with Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley. The senator said Trump was well received by hospital patients there, but that some didn’t want to meet with him, and that the president has been using racist language.

Trump “reacted with fury,” according to the Times, and called their presser a “fraud.”

By the way, Trump also accused the media this week of spreading anger and rage, and in our polarized environment, he has a point.


Now the president could have chosen to stay above the fray and ignore the attacks, but that’s not in his nature.

My only question is this: If Trump’s opponents are castigating him in the most caustic terms, and he fights back, why are the stories mainly framed around the president ruining a healing moment? Why don’t they say that both sides are engaging in partisan politics at a time when the country is grieving?

And all this has the unfortunate effect of diverting the focus from the victims and their families at the center of these twin tragedies.
 
Study suggests mainstream media double standard at work after arrest of Rep. Chris Collins
1529679731199.jpg

By Brian Flood | Fox News
1533935486856.jpg

Mainstream media spent more time on the arrest of Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y. in one day than it did in a year where Rep. Corrine Brown, D-Fla., was concerned.

Mainstream media has often been accused of focusing on the flaws of Republicans while looking the other way when it comes to Democrats. Consider this week's coverage of the arrest of Rep. Chris Collins, R-N.Y.

The Media Research Center reported that ABC, CBS and NBC combined to cover Collins’ arrest on evening and morning newscasts for a combined 18 minutes and 24 seconds during the first 24 hours of coverage. The MRC study also noted that similar ordeals involving a Democrat received little to no attention from the same networks.

Former Democrat Rep. Chaka Fattah resigned in 2016 after being convicted of federal corruption charges including bribery, racketeering, money laundering and bank fraud. The networks spent more time on Collins in one day than they did on Fattah in over a year, according to the MRC.

“During the year-and-a-half period in between his indictment and conviction for bribery and fraud, the ABC, CBS and NBC morning and evening programs managed a scant 68 seconds,” MRC associate editor Scott Whitlock wrote.

Former Florida Rep. Corrine Brown was sentenced last year to five years in prison over a variety of charges including fraud, but the networks ignored it all together. ABC, NBC and CBS combined for zero minutes of coverage from Brown’s indictment through sentencing, according to the MRC.

According to the MRC, CBS spent 7 minutes and 6 seconds on the Collins story, while ABC spent 5 minutes and 41 second and NBC dedicated 5 minutes and 37 seconds of airtime on the story.

CBS, ABC and NBC did not immediately respond when asked about the study.

Collins said he believes that charges filed against him "are meritless" and he will remain on the ballot for re-election. The indictment charges 68-year-old Collins; his son, Cameron Collins; and the father of his son's fiancée, Stephen Zarsky, with conspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud and making false statements to the FBI. All three pleaded not guilty in court Wednesday afternoon.

“On Wednesday and Thursday, the networks not only offered a lot of time to Collins’s arrest, but they also heavily emphasized the Republican’s connection to Trump,” Whitlock wrote. “Is that the journalistic standard now? Corruption matters because Trump is President? Apparently, corrupt Democrats were of no concern during the Obama era.”

Collins, who has served New York's 27th District since 2013, ran unopposed in the Republican primary and holds what's largely considered a safe Republican seat in a state that went to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton in 2016. He's being challenged by Democrat Nate McMurray, a Grand Island, N.Y., town supervisor.

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainmen...d-at-work-after-arrest-rep-chris-collins.html
The answer is simple: The mainstream media is all out to get you.
 
Press trashes Trump’s trip over his shots at those denouncing him

By Howard Kurtz | Fox News
'MediaBuzz' host Howard Kurtz weighs in on the mainstream media and Democratic presidential candidates criticizing President Trump's visits to Dayton, Ohio and El Paso, Texas.

The mainstream media couldn’t stand Donald Trump’s trip to El Paso and Dayton.

The coverage was overwhelmingly negative, going far beyond the Trump-isn’t-very-empathetic reviews he got when, for instance, he was tossing paper towels into a crowd after the Puerto Rican hurricane.

This was more of an indictment: the president made things worse in the wake of two mass shootings.

Now I’ll be the first to say it would have been better if Trump had put his phone away on Wednesday.

And there is no question that his past divisive rhetoric is a legitimate aspect of the story.

But many of the stories and segments were truly striking in their one-sidedness.

They conveyed the impression that only Trump had fouled the atmosphere with partisan swipes and Twitter taunts.

But in most of these instances, Trump was responding to slashing attacks from those he wound up criticizing. And yet that was repeatedly downplayed or dismissed.


It almost seems as if it’s acceptable for the president’s opponents to call him a white supremacist who is fomenting and condoning mass violence, but if he defends himself, he’s committed some awful breach of public decorum. Perhaps some journalists see the anti-Trump rhetoric as justified, and therefore acceptable?

Sure, you can say, he’s the president and should rise above the attacks in the interest of national unity. But why aren’t the critics held to a similar standard?

The New York Times headline captured the media zeitgeist:

“Trump Uses a Day of Healing to Deepen the Nation’s Divisions.”

See? It’s all his fault.

A “day intended to show compassion,” the paper says, “quickly devolved into an occasion for anger-fueled broadsides against Democrats and the news media.”

The “plan went awry” before the first flight, the Times says, when Trump tweeted at "Beto (phony name to indicate Hispanic heritage) O’Rourke," saying he was polling at 1 percent in the Democratic race and should “be quiet.”

But the former El Paso congressman, trying to revive his campaign, has repeatedly slammed Trump as a white supremacist and suggested he is condoning mass violence. Shouldn’t that be mentioned right away?


The Times story also notes that Trump took a whack at Joe Biden, but at least points out that the former VP gave a speech that same day accusing the president of having “fanned the flames of white supremacy.” In fact, the speech was a full-throated attack on Trump’s “toxic tongue”:

“How far is it from Trump’s saying this ‘is an invasion’ to the shooter in El Paso declaring ‘his attack is a response to the Hispanic invasion of Texas?’ Not far at all,” Biden said.

The Democratic front-runner has every right to make his case, but isn’t he being divisive as well?


Trump’s tweeted response: “Watching Sleepy Joe Biden making a speech. Sooo Boring! The LameStream Media will die in the ratings and clicks with this guy.”

The Washington Post led its story this way:

“On a day when President Trump vowed to tone down his rhetoric and help the country heal following two mass slayings, he did the opposite — lacing his visits Wednesday to El Paso and Dayton, Ohio, with a flurry of attacks on local leaders and memorializing his trips with grinning thumbs-up photos.”

The president did come on strong after his meeting with Ohio Sen. Sherrod Brown and Dayton Mayor Nan Whaley. The senator said Trump was well received by hospital patients there, but that some didn’t want to meet with him, and that the president has been using racist language.

Trump “reacted with fury,” according to the Times, and called their presser a “fraud.”

By the way, Trump also accused the media this week of spreading anger and rage, and in our polarized environment, he has a point.


Now the president could have chosen to stay above the fray and ignore the attacks, but that’s not in his nature.

My only question is this: If Trump’s opponents are castigating him in the most caustic terms, and he fights back, why are the stories mainly framed around the president ruining a healing moment? Why don’t they say that both sides are engaging in partisan politics at a time when the country is grieving?

And all this has the unfortunate effect of diverting the focus from the victims and their families at the center of these twin tragedies.
Oh, that sneaky mainstream media again. Further proof that they're out to get you.
 
Security guard for CNN's April Ryan reportedly facing charges over incident with reporter

By Brian Flood, Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

Bodyguard for CNN's April Ryan attacks journalist covering her event

New Brunswick Today editor Charlie Kratovil speaks out after the attack on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

The security guard of CNN political analyst April Ryan will apparently face criminal charges after he was captured on video appearing to violently remove a local news editor from an event where the outspoken pundit was a keynote speaker.

The alleged victim, Charlie Kratovil, editor of New Brunswick Today, tweeted an image of himself holding up court documents on Monday, noting that Ryan’s security guard, Joel Morris, will be arraigned on Sept. 12 in Superior Court on charges of harassment, assault and theft by unlawful taking.

A reporter also tweeted the document, but New Brunswick Municipal Court did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for confirmation. The court’s online archive was not updated with Monday’s documents at the time of this report.

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CNN'S APRIL RYAN AFTER BODYGUARD EJECTS LOCAL JOURNALIST: 'WHEN I SPEAK, I DON’T HAVE NEWS COVERING MY SPEECH'
The alleged incident occurred on Aug. 3, when Kratovil said he was covering a speech given by Ryan at the 4th annual New Jersey Parent Summit, which focuses on "educating, empowering and preparing parents for our future leaders.”

In emails obtained by Fox News, Kratovil had RSVP'd to the event and received confirmation.

Kratovil said during the event he was approached by a man who started to ask him questions. He said that he found out later that he was Ryan's security guard.

"During the intro, this man came up to me, mentioned my video camera & asked me 'Who are you with?'" Kratovil wrote on Twitter. "I gave him my card & explained that I followed the proper channels to cover the event. I asked if he had a card & he responded by saying he was 'with the speaker.'"

Kratovil alleged that Morris threatened to "take... down" the camera if he himself didn't and the public relations team began "pressuring" Kratovil to stop recording all while, ironically, U.S. Rep. Donald Payne Jr. was praising the American Urban Radio Networks reporter for her "Freedom of the Press" award she received.

CNN HAS BAD WEEK AMID APRIL RYAN, CHRIS CUOMO AND DON LEMON NEWS: ‘IT WAS QUITE EMBARRASSING’

Morris appears to approach Ryan as she was speaking at the podium and whispered something to her. She nods and then pauses for almost 30 seconds until Morris grabs Kratovil's camera equipment and tripod and walks out of the ballroom.

“Don’t touch my camera, please. Put that down. Don’t you dare. Put that down, sir," Kratovil told the bodyguard as he followed him out of the room.

As Kratovil and Morris begin causing a scene, Ryan explains to the crowd, “When I speak, I don’t have news covering my speech." Kratovil said another journalist was recording her speech.

The two men then enter the lobby, where Kratovil is berated by Shennell McCloud, executive director of Project Ready, the group that hosted the event. McCloud accuses Kratovil of "interrupting" the event and demands his removal from the hotel.

Security camera footage from the hotel lobby appears to show Morris forcibly pushing Kratovil toward the exit.

Once I got the camera back, I was concerned for my physical safety and I asked for hotel security. I was hoping they would maintain order and maybe document the theft of my camera and any damage that may have occurred to it as a result," Kratovil told Fox News. "I was thinking, 'Wow, this guy is really crossing the line here.' At the same time, I was trying not to fall down face first while also trying to protect the camera, and yelling for bystanders to call the police as this was happening."

Kratovil expressed his solidarity with Ryan, an outspoken critic of President Trump and his treatment of the press, but told Fox News that "her reputation" now depends on addressing what had happened and is hoping for an apology.

"I think that the President deserves much criticism for his administration's lack of transparency, his own irresponsible rhetoric towards the media, and his childish attacks on individual reporters like Ms. Ryan," Kratovil said. "Her reputation now depends on finally addressing this situation head-on and proclaiming that what happened that night in New Brunswick cannot be tolerated."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-april-ryan-security-guard
 
Security guard for CNN's April Ryan reportedly facing charges over incident with reporter

By Brian Flood, Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

Bodyguard for CNN's April Ryan attacks journalist covering her event
New Brunswick Today editor Charlie Kratovil speaks out after the attack on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

The security guard of CNN political analyst April Ryan will apparently face criminal charges after he was captured on video appearing to violently remove a local news editor from an event where the outspoken pundit was a keynote speaker.

The alleged victim, Charlie Kratovil, editor of New Brunswick Today, tweeted an image of himself holding up court documents on Monday, noting that Ryan’s security guard, Joel Morris, will be arraigned on Sept. 12 in Superior Court on charges of harassment, assault and theft by unlawful taking.

A reporter also tweeted the document, but New Brunswick Municipal Court did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for confirmation. The court’s online archive was not updated with Monday’s documents at the time of this report.

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CNN'S APRIL RYAN AFTER BODYGUARD EJECTS LOCAL JOURNALIST: 'WHEN I SPEAK, I DON’T HAVE NEWS COVERING MY SPEECH'
The alleged incident occurred on Aug. 3, when Kratovil said he was covering a speech given by Ryan at the 4th annual New Jersey Parent Summit, which focuses on "educating, empowering and preparing parents for our future leaders.”

In emails obtained by Fox News, Kratovil had RSVP'd to the event and received confirmation.

Kratovil said during the event he was approached by a man who started to ask him questions. He said that he found out later that he was Ryan's security guard.

"During the intro, this man came up to me, mentioned my video camera & asked me 'Who are you with?'" Kratovil wrote on Twitter. "I gave him my card & explained that I followed the proper channels to cover the event. I asked if he had a card & he responded by saying he was 'with the speaker.'"

Kratovil alleged that Morris threatened to "take... down" the camera if he himself didn't and the public relations team began "pressuring" Kratovil to stop recording all while, ironically, U.S. Rep. Donald Payne Jr. was praising the American Urban Radio Networks reporter for her "Freedom of the Press" award she received.

CNN HAS BAD WEEK AMID APRIL RYAN, CHRIS CUOMO AND DON LEMON NEWS: ‘IT WAS QUITE EMBARRASSING’

Morris appears to approach Ryan as she was speaking at the podium and whispered something to her. She nods and then pauses for almost 30 seconds until Morris grabs Kratovil's camera equipment and tripod and walks out of the ballroom.

“Don’t touch my camera, please. Put that down. Don’t you dare. Put that down, sir," Kratovil told the bodyguard as he followed him out of the room.

As Kratovil and Morris begin causing a scene, Ryan explains to the crowd, “When I speak, I don’t have news covering my speech." Kratovil said another journalist was recording her speech.

The two men then enter the lobby, where Kratovil is berated by Shennell McCloud, executive director of Project Ready, the group that hosted the event. McCloud accuses Kratovil of "interrupting" the event and demands his removal from the hotel.

Security camera footage from the hotel lobby appears to show Morris forcibly pushing Kratovil toward the exit.

Once I got the camera back, I was concerned for my physical safety and I asked for hotel security. I was hoping they would maintain order and maybe document the theft of my camera and any damage that may have occurred to it as a result," Kratovil told Fox News. "I was thinking, 'Wow, this guy is really crossing the line here.' At the same time, I was trying not to fall down face first while also trying to protect the camera, and yelling for bystanders to call the police as this was happening."

Kratovil expressed his solidarity with Ryan, an outspoken critic of President Trump and his treatment of the press, but told Fox News that "her reputation" now depends on addressing what had happened and is hoping for an apology.

"I think that the President deserves much criticism for his administration's lack of transparency, his own irresponsible rhetoric towards the media, and his childish attacks on individual reporters like Ms. Ryan," Kratovil said. "Her reputation now depends on finally addressing this situation head-on and proclaiming that what happened that night in New Brunswick cannot be tolerated."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-april-ryan-security-guard
 
Last edited:
Security guard for CNN's April Ryan reportedly facing charges over incident with reporter

By Brian Flood, Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

Bodyguard for CNN's April Ryan attacks journalist covering her event
New Brunswick Today editor Charlie Kratovil speaks out after the attack on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

The security guard of CNN political analyst April Ryan will apparently face criminal charges after he was captured on video appearing to violently remove a local news editor from an event where the outspoken pundit was a keynote speaker.

The alleged victim, Charlie Kratovil, editor of New Brunswick Today, tweeted an image of himself holding up court documents on Monday, noting that Ryan’s security guard, Joel Morris, will be arraigned on Sept. 12 in Superior Court on charges of harassment, assault and theft by unlawful taking.

A reporter also tweeted the document, but New Brunswick Municipal Court did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for confirmation. The court’s online archive was not updated with Monday’s documents at the time of this report.

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CNN'S APRIL RYAN AFTER BODYGUARD EJECTS LOCAL JOURNALIST: 'WHEN I SPEAK, I DON’T HAVE NEWS COVERING MY SPEECH'
The alleged incident occurred on Aug. 3, when Kratovil said he was covering a speech given by Ryan at the 4th annual New Jersey Parent Summit, which focuses on "educating, empowering and preparing parents for our future leaders.”

In emails obtained by Fox News, Kratovil had RSVP'd to the event and received confirmation.

Kratovil said during the event he was approached by a man who started to ask him questions. He said that he found out later that he was Ryan's security guard.

"During the intro, this man came up to me, mentioned my video camera & asked me 'Who are you with?'" Kratovil wrote on Twitter. "I gave him my card & explained that I followed the proper channels to cover the event. I asked if he had a card & he responded by saying he was 'with the speaker.'"

Kratovil alleged that Morris threatened to "take... down" the camera if he himself didn't and the public relations team began "pressuring" Kratovil to stop recording all while, ironically, U.S. Rep. Donald Payne Jr. was praising the American Urban Radio Networks reporter for her "Freedom of the Press" award she received.

CNN HAS BAD WEEK AMID APRIL RYAN, CHRIS CUOMO AND DON LEMON NEWS: ‘IT WAS QUITE EMBARRASSING’

Morris appears to approach Ryan as she was speaking at the podium and whispered something to her. She nods and then pauses for almost 30 seconds until Morris grabs Kratovil's camera equipment and tripod and walks out of the ballroom.

“Don’t touch my camera, please. Put that down. Don’t you dare. Put that down, sir," Kratovil told the bodyguard as he followed him out of the room.

As Kratovil and Morris begin causing a scene, Ryan explains to the crowd, “When I speak, I don’t have news covering my speech." Kratovil said another journalist was recording her speech.

The two men then enter the lobby, where Kratovil is berated by Shennell McCloud, executive director of Project Ready, the group that hosted the event. McCloud accuses Kratovil of "interrupting" the event and demands his removal from the hotel.

Security camera footage from the hotel lobby appears to show Morris forcibly pushing Kratovil toward the exit.

Once I got the camera back, I was concerned for my physical safety and I asked for hotel security. I was hoping they would maintain order and maybe document the theft of my camera and any damage that may have occurred to it as a result," Kratovil told Fox News. "I was thinking, 'Wow, this guy is really crossing the line here.' At the same time, I was trying not to fall down face first while also trying to protect the camera, and yelling for bystanders to call the police as this was happening."

Kratovil expressed his solidarity with Ryan, an outspoken critic of President Trump and his treatment of the press, but told Fox News that "her reputation" now depends on addressing what had happened and is hoping for an apology.

"I think that the President deserves much criticism for his administration's lack of transparency, his own irresponsible rhetoric towards the media, and his childish attacks on individual reporters like Ms. Ryan," Kratovil said. "Her reputation now depends on finally addressing this situation head-on and proclaiming that what happened that night in New Brunswick cannot be tolerated."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-april-ryan-security-guard

Trump does that all the time
 
NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn’t happen this week
By BEATRICE DUPUY, ARIJETA LAJKA and ABRIL MULATOAugust 30, 2019
A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these is legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out. Here are the real facts:
___
CLAIM: Photo shows a jaguar being rescued after throwing itself in the water during recent fires in the Amazon.

THE FACTS: The photo, which has circulated widely on social media as a record number of wildfires burn in Brazil, was taken in 2016 by Brazilian photographer None Mangueira as part of a project to save jaguars in the Amazon. It shows a Brazilian army soldier swimming with a jaguar in the middle of the Rio Negro in Manaus, the capital of Amazonas state. Mangueira told The Associated Press that the jaguar, Jiquitaia, was adopted by the army after hunters killed his mother. Soldiers who raised Jiquitaia took him to swim every day. He was 2 years old in the picture. “It has nothing to do with the fires,” Mangueira said. The project, Jaguars in the Amazon, was created by the Military Command of the Amazon, a branch of the Brazilian army. It seeks to promote the preservation of the species in that area. The Amazon provides the largest contiguous area of habitat for jaguars and is considered key to their survival. Mangueira said the photo has been wrongly identified before and used without her authorization. In June 2016, the photo of Jiquitaia was wrongly identified as being Juma, a 9-year-old jaguar shot dead by a soldier after participating in an Olympic torch event in Manaus. She posted on her Facebook page about the misuse of the photo in 2016, “Here’s an alert for us photographers about the bad faith of third parties. Protect you projects, protect your images! Help me spread the truth!
__
CLAIM: The Amazon rainforest — “the lungs of the Earth” — produces 20% of the planet’s oxygen.

THE FACTS: Scientists say while the Amazon is important to the world’s ecosystem, it does not produce 20% of the world’s oxygen. In fact, the region absorbs the same amount of oxygen it produces. The 20% figure circulated widely this month as concerns grew around fires burning in the Amazon. It was passed on social media platforms, cited by politicians and quoted by the media, including The Associated Press. The reality, according to experts, is that forests, including the Amazon, absorb roughly the same amount of oxygen as they produce. While plants do produce oxygen through photosynthesis, experts explained, they also absorb it to grow, as do animals and microbes. “Even if all plants in the Amazon stopped doing photosynthesis, we would not notice,” Jonathan Foley, executive director of Project Drawdown, a global climate solutions, told The Associated Press. “It would take millions of years for the atmosphere to run out of oxygen.” Still, that doesn’t mean the fires aren’t an issue for the planet. The Amazon plays a key role in draining heat-trapping carbon dioxide, CO2, from the atmosphere. It’s estimated the Amazon takes in almost 2 billion tons a year of CO2, making it key to preventing climate change. Scott Denning, an atmospheric scientist at Colorado State University, told The Associated Press that much of the world’s oxygen comes from the ocean. Plants, such as phytoplankton, have contributed to breathable oxygen through photosynthesis for millions of years. Denning said he has a theory about how the 20 percent figure might have originated, citing a study published in Science Magazine in 2010, which found the Amazon accounts for 20 percent of land photosynthesis. Among those who used the false figure was French President Emmanuel Macron, who took to Twitter on Aug. 22 to demand that world leaders at the G-7 summit in Biarritz, France, discuss what he called an emergency. “Our house is burning,” he tweeted. “Literally. The Amazon rainforest - the lungs which produces 20% of our planet’s oxygen - is on fire. It is an international crisis. Members of the G7 Summit, let’s discuss this emergency first order in two days!” Ultimately, the Group of Seven nations pledged $20 million from the group.
___
CLAIM: Video shows a helicopter setting fire to the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.

THE FACTS: The video shows a helicopter participating in an effort to contain a wildfire in the Canadian province of British Columbia in August 2018. The video was shared on Facebook and YouTube, falsely identified as showing a helicopter setting fire to the Amazon rainforest. Tom Arduini, owner of Arduini Helicopters in Williams Lake, British Columbia, told The Associated Press he was flying the helicopter featured in the video. He said fire was being sprayed from the helicopter onto a forest fire below as part of a tactic called back burning, where fires are intentionally set in dry areas to keep a wildfire from spreading. “The area set on fire is known as the fire guard” Arduini said. “If you don’t do it, the fire will continue to burn,” he said. The video was filmed southwest of Quesnel, British Columbia. There was another helicopter flying overhead filming the crew. Arduini posted the video on the company’s Facebook page on August 22, 2018, with the caption: “Busy again this year with firefighting. This time fighting fire with fire!” He said the video was taken a few days before it was published. The video has been used with false claims before on social media. In November 2018, as deadly wildfires burned in California, it was posted on YouTube claiming to show a “helicopter caught causing California fires.”
___
CLAIM: Olive Garden is “funding” President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign.

THE FACTS: Social media users began recirculating the false claim on Twitter early this week, encouraging users to boycott the chain restaurant. Olive Garden responded with a tweet stating that the information was incorrect and that neither the Olive Garden nor Darden Restaurants, Inc., its parent company, contributes to presidential candidates. Darden operates several restaurant chains, including LongHorn Steakhouse, The Capital Grille and Bahama Breeze. Olive Garden, an Italian-themed restaurant, first addressed the claim on Aug.9 after a tweet, which got more than 500,000 likes, included the company on a list of places supporting Trump’s reelection. “We did send a message to our restaurants to address the inaccurate information in case they got questions from guests,” Meagan Bernstein, an Olive Garden spokeswoman, said in an email to the AP. The company tweeted Sunday to clarify that Darden does not donate to candidates on the national level. They posted the information after a tweet emerged stating: “Olive Garden is funding Trump’s re-election in 2020. It would be terrible if you shared this and Olive Garden lost business. In the 2018 election cycle, all contributions to candidates from Darden Restaurants were from individuals, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan research group that tracks money in U.S. politics, which runs OpenSecrets.org. For Darden Restaurants, the site includes a disclaimer that says Darden did not donate the money itself. The false claim about Olive Garden follows an internet campaign earlier this month that called for a boycott of the luxury gym Equinox and cycling studio SoulCycle after it was announced that the owner of the companies, Stephen Ross, was throwing a fundraiser for Trump.
___
This is part of The Associated Press’ ongoing effort to fact-check misinformation that is shared widely online, including work with Facebook to identify and reduce the circulation of false stories on the platform.
 
NOT REAL NEWS: A look at what didn’t happen this week
By BEATRICE DUPUY, ARIJETA LAJKA and ABRIL MULATOAugust 30, 2019
A roundup of some of the most popular but completely untrue stories and visuals of the week. None of these is legit, even though they were shared widely on social media. The Associated Press checked them out. Here are the real facts:
___
CLAIM: Photo shows a jaguar being rescued after throwing itself in the water during recent fires in the Amazon.

THE FACTS: The photo, which has circulated widely on social media as a record number of wildfires burn in Brazil, was taken in 2016 by Brazilian photographer None Mangueira as part of a project to save jaguars in the Amazon. It shows a Brazilian army soldier swimming with a jaguar in the middle of the Rio Negro in Manaus, the capital of Amazonas state. Mangueira told The Associated Press that the jaguar, Jiquitaia, was adopted by the army after hunters killed his mother. Soldiers who raised Jiquitaia took him to swim every day. He was 2 years old in the picture. “It has nothing to do with the fires,” Mangueira said. The project, Jaguars in the Amazon, was created by the Military Command of the Amazon, a branch of the Brazilian army. It seeks to promote the preservation of the species in that area. The Amazon provides the largest contiguous area of habitat for jaguars and is considered key to their survival. Mangueira said the photo has been wrongly identified before and used without her authorization. In June 2016, the photo of Jiquitaia was wrongly identified as being Juma, a 9-year-old jaguar shot dead by a soldier after participating in an Olympic torch event in Manaus. She posted on her Facebook page about the misuse of the photo in 2016, “Here’s an alert for us photographers about the bad faith of third parties. Protect you projects, protect your images! Help me spread the truth!
__
CLAIM: The Amazon rainforest — “the lungs of the Earth” — produces 20% of the planet’s oxygen.

THE FACTS: Scientists say while the Amazon is important to the world’s ecosystem, it does not produce 20% of the world’s oxygen. In fact, the region absorbs the same amount of oxygen it produces. The 20% figure circulated widely this month as concerns grew around fires burning in the Amazon. It was passed on social media platforms, cited by politicians and quoted by the media, including The Associated Press. The reality, according to experts, is that forests, including the Amazon, absorb roughly the same amount of oxygen as they produce. While plants do produce oxygen through photosynthesis, experts explained, they also absorb it to grow, as do animals and microbes. “Even if all plants in the Amazon stopped doing photosynthesis, we would not notice,” Jonathan Foley, executive director of Project Drawdown, a global climate solutions, told The Associated Press. “It would take millions of years for the atmosphere to run out of oxygen.” Still, that doesn’t mean the fires aren’t an issue for the planet. The Amazon plays a key role in draining heat-trapping carbon dioxide, CO2, from the atmosphere. It’s estimated the Amazon takes in almost 2 billion tons a year of CO2, making it key to preventing climate change. Scott Denning, an atmospheric scientist at Colorado State University, told The Associated Press that much of the world’s oxygen comes from the ocean. Plants, such as phytoplankton, have contributed to breathable oxygen through photosynthesis for millions of years. Denning said he has a theory about how the 20 percent figure might have originated, citing a study published in Science Magazine in 2010, which found the Amazon accounts for 20 percent of land photosynthesis. Among those who used the false figure was French President Emmanuel Macron, who took to Twitter on Aug. 22 to demand that world leaders at the G-7 summit in Biarritz, France, discuss what he called an emergency. “Our house is burning,” he tweeted. “Literally. The Amazon rainforest - the lungs which produces 20% of our planet’s oxygen - is on fire. It is an international crisis. Members of the G7 Summit, let’s discuss this emergency first order in two days!” Ultimately, the Group of Seven nations pledged $20 million from the group.
___
CLAIM: Video shows a helicopter setting fire to the Amazon rainforest in Brazil.

THE FACTS: The video shows a helicopter participating in an effort to contain a wildfire in the Canadian province of British Columbia in August 2018. The video was shared on Facebook and YouTube, falsely identified as showing a helicopter setting fire to the Amazon rainforest. Tom Arduini, owner of Arduini Helicopters in Williams Lake, British Columbia, told The Associated Press he was flying the helicopter featured in the video. He said fire was being sprayed from the helicopter onto a forest fire below as part of a tactic called back burning, where fires are intentionally set in dry areas to keep a wildfire from spreading. “The area set on fire is known as the fire guard” Arduini said. “If you don’t do it, the fire will continue to burn,” he said. The video was filmed southwest of Quesnel, British Columbia. There was another helicopter flying overhead filming the crew. Arduini posted the video on the company’s Facebook page on August 22, 2018, with the caption: “Busy again this year with firefighting. This time fighting fire with fire!” He said the video was taken a few days before it was published. The video has been used with false claims before on social media. In November 2018, as deadly wildfires burned in California, it was posted on YouTube claiming to show a “helicopter caught causing California fires.”
___
CLAIM: Olive Garden is “funding” President Donald Trump’s 2020 re-election campaign.

THE FACTS: Social media users began recirculating the false claim on Twitter early this week, encouraging users to boycott the chain restaurant. Olive Garden responded with a tweet stating that the information was incorrect and that neither the Olive Garden nor Darden Restaurants, Inc., its parent company, contributes to presidential candidates. Darden operates several restaurant chains, including LongHorn Steakhouse, The Capital Grille and Bahama Breeze. Olive Garden, an Italian-themed restaurant, first addressed the claim on Aug.9 after a tweet, which got more than 500,000 likes, included the company on a list of places supporting Trump’s reelection. “We did send a message to our restaurants to address the inaccurate information in case they got questions from guests,” Meagan Bernstein, an Olive Garden spokeswoman, said in an email to the AP. The company tweeted Sunday to clarify that Darden does not donate to candidates on the national level. They posted the information after a tweet emerged stating: “Olive Garden is funding Trump’s re-election in 2020. It would be terrible if you shared this and Olive Garden lost business. In the 2018 election cycle, all contributions to candidates from Darden Restaurants were from individuals, according to an analysis by the Center for Responsive Politics, a non-partisan research group that tracks money in U.S. politics, which runs OpenSecrets.org. For Darden Restaurants, the site includes a disclaimer that says Darden did not donate the money itself. The false claim about Olive Garden follows an internet campaign earlier this month that called for a boycott of the luxury gym Equinox and cycling studio SoulCycle after it was announced that the owner of the companies, Stephen Ross, was throwing a fundraiser for Trump.
___
This is part of The Associated Press’ ongoing effort to fact-check misinformation that is shared widely online, including work with Facebook to identify and reduce the circulation of false stories on the platform.

Your president is the source for much of the fake news.
 
Security guard for CNN's April Ryan reportedly facing charges over incident with reporter

By Brian Flood, Joseph A. Wulfsohn | Fox News

Bodyguard for CNN's April Ryan attacks journalist covering her event
New Brunswick Today editor Charlie Kratovil speaks out after the attack on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

The security guard of CNN political analyst April Ryan will apparently face criminal charges after he was captured on video appearing to violently remove a local news editor from an event where the outspoken pundit was a keynote speaker.

The alleged victim, Charlie Kratovil, editor of New Brunswick Today, tweeted an image of himself holding up court documents on Monday, noting that Ryan’s security guard, Joel Morris, will be arraigned on Sept. 12 in Superior Court on charges of harassment, assault and theft by unlawful taking.

A reporter also tweeted the document, but New Brunswick Municipal Court did not immediately respond to Fox News' request for confirmation. The court’s online archive was not updated with Monday’s documents at the time of this report.

CNN did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

CNN'S APRIL RYAN AFTER BODYGUARD EJECTS LOCAL JOURNALIST: 'WHEN I SPEAK, I DON’T HAVE NEWS COVERING MY SPEECH'
The alleged incident occurred on Aug. 3, when Kratovil said he was covering a speech given by Ryan at the 4th annual New Jersey Parent Summit, which focuses on "educating, empowering and preparing parents for our future leaders.”

In emails obtained by Fox News, Kratovil had RSVP'd to the event and received confirmation.

Kratovil said during the event he was approached by a man who started to ask him questions. He said that he found out later that he was Ryan's security guard.

"During the intro, this man came up to me, mentioned my video camera & asked me 'Who are you with?'" Kratovil wrote on Twitter. "I gave him my card & explained that I followed the proper channels to cover the event. I asked if he had a card & he responded by saying he was 'with the speaker.'"

Kratovil alleged that Morris threatened to "take... down" the camera if he himself didn't and the public relations team began "pressuring" Kratovil to stop recording all while, ironically, U.S. Rep. Donald Payne Jr. was praising the American Urban Radio Networks reporter for her "Freedom of the Press" award she received.

CNN HAS BAD WEEK AMID APRIL RYAN, CHRIS CUOMO AND DON LEMON NEWS: ‘IT WAS QUITE EMBARRASSING’

Morris appears to approach Ryan as she was speaking at the podium and whispered something to her. She nods and then pauses for almost 30 seconds until Morris grabs Kratovil's camera equipment and tripod and walks out of the ballroom.

“Don’t touch my camera, please. Put that down. Don’t you dare. Put that down, sir," Kratovil told the bodyguard as he followed him out of the room.

As Kratovil and Morris begin causing a scene, Ryan explains to the crowd, “When I speak, I don’t have news covering my speech." Kratovil said another journalist was recording her speech.

The two men then enter the lobby, where Kratovil is berated by Shennell McCloud, executive director of Project Ready, the group that hosted the event. McCloud accuses Kratovil of "interrupting" the event and demands his removal from the hotel.

Security camera footage from the hotel lobby appears to show Morris forcibly pushing Kratovil toward the exit.

Once I got the camera back, I was concerned for my physical safety and I asked for hotel security. I was hoping they would maintain order and maybe document the theft of my camera and any damage that may have occurred to it as a result," Kratovil told Fox News. "I was thinking, 'Wow, this guy is really crossing the line here.' At the same time, I was trying not to fall down face first while also trying to protect the camera, and yelling for bystanders to call the police as this was happening."

Kratovil expressed his solidarity with Ryan, an outspoken critic of President Trump and his treatment of the press, but told Fox News that "her reputation" now depends on addressing what had happened and is hoping for an apology.

"I think that the President deserves much criticism for his administration's lack of transparency, his own irresponsible rhetoric towards the media, and his childish attacks on individual reporters like Ms. Ryan," Kratovil said. "Her reputation now depends on finally addressing this situation head-on and proclaiming that what happened that night in New Brunswick cannot be tolerated."
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnn-april-ryan-security-guard
This reminds me of Trump.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/blame-abc-news-finds-17-cases-invoking-trump/story?id=58912889
 
CNN keeps trying to outdo itself on presenting non-news segments featuring alcoholic TDS Hollywood dementia-patient because his unhinged, profane rants make their viewers ignore the facts.

Robert De Niro’s foul-mouthed CNN appearance raises eyebrows inside network: ‘What did our viewers gain?’

By Brian Flood | Fox News

Outspoken anti-Trump actor Robert De Niro dropped a pair of f-bombs when asked about Fox News during a conversation about President Trump in a vulgar CNN appearance on Sunday that has critics wondering what he was doing on the liberal network in the first place.

A current CNN on-air personality who spoke on condition of anonymity questioned the decision to book De Niro.

“It’s particularly puzzling that our show, which allegedly critiques media, would choose to host a Hollywood celebrity with zero discernible news value,” the CNN employee said. “What is his credential, other than deeply hating the president? What did our viewers gain from his vulgarity?”

The 76-year-old De Niro appeared on CNN’s media show “Reliable Sources” with host Brian Stelter, who told the Hollywood legend that the liberal network had been trying to book him “for a while.” De Niro is famous for his tough-guy shtick and has used profanity to attack Trump in the past, including famously launching a salty tirade at the president during the 2018 Tony Awards.

During his live CNN appearance, De Niro called the president “crazy” and didn’t disappoint fans of his iconic gangster flicks when he was asked about pundits on Fox News who support Trump.

“F--- ‘em, f--- ‘em,” De Niro said.

The Hill media reporter Joe Concha feels the situation was “contrived” because CNN has allowed profanity on its air in the past and De Niro is known for using vulgar language when speaking about President Trump. CNN has not distanced itself from the interview and even promoted it on social media and its website.

A second CNN personality, also speaking on the condition of anonymity, said they would have quickly ended the interview when De Niro used profanity.

“I would have said, ‘We’re done here,’ but entitlement culture comes from people who are icons in their trade, they think they can get away with that on a Sunday morning,” the source said. “But if it’s good for ratings you can deal with the blowback.”

Stelter, unlike his colleague, did not immediately apologize for the language and noted that it was on cable so the comment wouldn’t result in an FCC violation.

A CNN spokesperson directed Fox News to a Twitter exchange between Stelter and a National Republican Senatorial Committee staffer when asked why the partisan actor was booked on a media show.

“Interviewing one of the best-known actors in the world falls squarely within the purpose, which is (as I say most Sundays) to explore ‘how the media world works, how the news gets made,’” Stelter tweeted when asked the purpose of his show in the first place.

“So his reliability as a reliable source on key issues like impeachment and the President’s mental health is based solely on his status as a celebrity? Just wanted to make clear that was the calculus,” NRSC staffer Matt Whitlock fired back at the “Reliable Sources” host.

NewsBusters managing editor Curtis Houck told Fox News that the CNN media show is “as close to a sermon for the Resistance as one will get” and De Niro's appearance was nothing different.

"Stelter feigned discomfort for what happened, but in reality, CNN couldn't be any prouder of how that went down. De Niro's tirade illustrated why any lecture from [CNN] about civility and decency will continue to ring hollow,” Houck said. “The desire to impeach the president has become such an obsession for CNN and the rest of the liberal media that it's become a 21st-century version of the golden calf that these people worship.”

De Niro – who has played former Special Counsel Robert Mueller on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live – once urged Mueller to speak out against Trump in an open letter published by the New York Times. The Oscar-winning actor has also called Trump a “total loser,” a “f---ing idiot,” “f---ing fool” and said he would like to punch the president in the face.

“No Things Considered” host and political satirist Tim Young also questioned why the actor was booked on CNN’s media show.

"I'm not sure how Robert De Niro is a ‘reliable source,’ or what he would even be a reliable source on. He didn’t talk Hollywood, he was brought on to rant and swear about why he hates Trump,” Young told Fox News before joking, “Oh, I get it, maybe he was a reliable source on Trump Derangement Syndrome.”

DePauw University professor and frequent CNN critic Jeffrey McCall told Fox News: “We live in a weird time in which pop culture blends with public affairs,” but even with that consideration, there is no journalistic purpose to putting somebody like De Niro on “what is supposed to be a serious” show about media and public affairs.

“The producers, including Stelter, just had to know that De Niro would go on television and cut loose with verbal brickbats and that's what they got," McCall said. "Having Hollywood types on news programs to discuss national policy is a problem from the outset, but having an actor who has a history of strident and profane outbursts just further disrupts public dialogue.

“The problem with this interview is not just the foul language, but also the angry and emotional tone that permeates the discussion,” McCall continued. ‘De Niro clearly detests Trump, which he has a right to do, but Stelter needed to guide the discussion into something that might generate meaningful insight… this interview was not good television or good journalism. It simply fuels public disenchantment with how the media does its job, allowing emotion and polarization into what needs to be rational dialogue.”

Media Research Center vice president Dan Gainor mocked the interview on Twitter, writing that “Reliable Sources” is “just left-wing activism” and noting that actual “journalists” don’t care what De Niro thinks of Trump.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/robert-de-niro-cnn
 
Fox News crushes MSNBC, CNN to win 71st straight quarter as ‘Hannity’ finishes atop cable news

By Brian Flood | Fox News

Fox News Channel has been the most-watched cable news network for a whopping 71 straight quarters after dominating MSNBC and CNN during the third quarter of 2019.

Fox News averaged 2.4 million primetime viewers from 8-11 p.m. ET, while MSNBC averaged 1.5 million, and struggling CNN managed only a smidge over the one million mark.

FNC’s primetime trio finished as the three most-watched programs, as “Hannity” finished No. 1 on cable news, averaging 3.3 million nightly viewers. “Tucker Carlson Tonight” averaged 3.1 million to finish second and “The Ingraham Angle” averaged 2.6 million to finish third.

MSNBC’s “The Rachel Maddow Show” finished fourth, behind FNC’s entire primetime lineup. It was Maddow’s lowest-rated viewership since the first quarter of 2017.

CNN’s most-watched show was “Cuomo Prime Time,” which finished No. 23 overall behind 14 different programs on Fox News and eight on MSNBC. “Cuomo Prime Time” was unable to crack the top 20 programs despite a ton of free publicity in August when nearly 10 million people watched a viral video of host Chris Cuomo famously threatening a man who referred to him as "Fredo."

Fox News also topped cable news among they key demographic of adults age 25-54, averaging 366,000 primetime viewers compared to 268,000 for CNN and 228,000 for MSNBC.

Fox News nearly topped both networks combined among total day viewers, averaging 1.4 million while MSNBC averaged 880,000 and CNN averaged 624,000. Among the key demo, Fox News averaged 230,000 viewers compared to 148,000 for CNN and 128,000 for MSNBC.

FNC had double-digit percent advantages over MSNBC and CNN in both categories and a triple-digit percent advantage over CNN in primetime total viewers. But Fox News didn’t only beat MSNBC and CNN, as it topped all of basic cable in both total day and primetime viewers, too.

It was the 13th consecutive quarter that FNC finished atop all of basic cable among total day viewers.

“Fox & Friends” celebrated its 21st anniversary during the third quarter by finishing as the most-watched cable news morning show for the 71st straight quarter with an average viewership of 1.5 million, while CNN’s “New Day” managed a dismal total of 461,000 daily viewers. “Outnumbered Overtime” with Harris Faulkner averaged 1.3 million viewers to beat its 1 p.m. ET competition not just on cable, but it even outdrew ABC News’ heavily promoted “GMA” 25 times during the quarter.

FNC also finished September as the most-watched network in all of cable for the 39th straight month.

All ratings data courtesy of Nielsen Media Research.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top