Politics Fighting back! (3 Viewers)

[JfizzleBlazer]

Not based on AIPAC money. Just based on their support of Israel.

Also, Israel can pay politicians without using AIPAC. That's why focusing on Israel or AIPAC is just a distraction, IMO.


I would gladly vote for Ro Khanna over Newsom.

I was asking because there are things out there that claim Khanna has taken aipac money. He also read Dershowitz book and quoted it.

 

[Phatguysrule]

I was asking because there are things out there that claim Khanna has taken aipac money. He also read Dershowitz book and quoted it.

His stances have been in line with what I expect. So I'm good.

He's also one of 7 members of Congress who publicly reject ALL money from special interests PACs outright. He doesn't accept any money from lobbyists.

I would need to some evidence to believe he is taking money from AIPAC.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

His stances have been in line with what I expect. So I'm good.

He's also one of 7 members of Congress who publicly reject ALL money from special interests PACs outright. He doesn't accept any money from lobbyists.

I would need to some evidence to believe he is taking money from AIPAC.

It could be false. Thats why i'm asking you where you get such info. I'm genuinely curious.

So far I disagree with you on the MTG and Tucker side of things.

Help me out on why you like this guy.

 

[Phatguysrule]

It could be false. Thats why i'm asking you where you get such info. I'm genuinely curious.

So far I disagree with you on the MTG and Tucker side of things.

Help me out on why you like this guy.

I'm not a huge Ro Khana guy. I'd just take him over these other candidates. I could definitely be swayed, but probably not by someone who accepts money from lobbyists.

He's just the most progressive candidate on this list, as far as I can tell.

 

[crandc]

Trump administration dropped their defense of lawsuit so, the rainbow flag is once again flying over Stonewall memorial.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

I'm not a huge Ro Khana guy. I'd just take him over these other candidates. I could definitely be swayed, but probably not by someone who accepts money from lobbyists.

He's just the most progressive candidate on this list, as far as I can tell.

I went back and looked through MTG's positions. I just can't support a coalition with her and her stances. So many of them are so bad.

 

[crandc]

After FIFA invented a Peace prize to give Trump, the German men's team invented their own peace prize, and awarded it to owner of St. Paul bar that became organizing center for anti ICE protests in Minnesota.

 

[Phatguysrule]

I went back and looked through MTG's positions. I just can't support a coalition with her and her stances. So many of them are so bad.

I'm not suggesting you support MTG. That coalition has already gotten the law passed that requires the Epstein files be released.

I've see nothing that would suggest he wants anybody to support MTG or Tucker Carlson.

He simply reached across the isle to them because they were the ones who also supported going after the Epstein files.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

I'm not suggesting you support MTG. That coalition has already gotten the law passed that requires the Epstein files be released.

I've see nothing that would suggest he wants anybody to support MTG or Tucker Carlson.

He simply reached across the isle to them because they were the ones who also supported going after the Epstein files.

He straight up said he wants to create a broad populist coalition with them. Lol.

I don't have any room for people with Tucker or MTGs track record. I don't trust them.

That doesnt mean I don't have room for change from some of those folks. Certainly not them. Or Kelly. Or Fuentes.

 

[Phatguysrule]

He straight up said he wants to create a broad populist coalition with them. Lol.

I don't have any room for people with Tucker or MTGs track record. I don't trust them.

That doesnt mean I don't have room for change from some of those folks. Certainly not them. Or Kelly. Or Fuentes.

I think that coalition would be a good thing, even if it included people like MTG and Tucker Carlson.

It would be much stronger and more persuasive than a coalition without their followers, wouldn't it?

*Edit* I'm not trying to convince you to support him, just following the conversation. MTG is stepping down. She's not going to have much power, so I'm not sure how trust matters. If a cause like this can collect her supporters I think that would be great.

And Carlson is just a means to an end. Communication with more people that he may not be able to without him.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

I think that coalition would be a good thing, even if it included people like MTG and Tucker Carlson.

It would be much stronger and more persuasive than a coalition without their followers, wouldn't it?

*Edit* I'm not trying to convince you to support him, just following the conversation. MTG is stepping down. She's not going to have much power, so I'm not sure how trust matters. If a cause like this can collect her supporters I think that would be great.

And Carlson is just a means to an end. Communication with more people that he may not be able to without him.

We will just have to disagree here. I'm not for reaching across the aisle for those folks.

Massie, fine. Other republicans, sure. Tucker and MTG. No fucking way. A one off? Maybe. But not a coalition.

 

[Phatguysrule]

We will just have to disagree here. I'm not for reaching across the aisle for those folks.

Massie, fine. Other republicans, sure. Tucker and MTG. No fucking way. A one off? Maybe. But not a coalition.

I'm not sure if there are many more willing to address these issues.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

I'm not sure if there are many more willing to address these issues.

And why do you think they claim to want to address these issues?

 

[Phatguysrule]

And why do you think they claim to want to address these issues?

Because that's what their constituents want. That's how they have any power at all. Especially MTG. Tucker Carlson has lost all if his other support.

They both have to cater to the people who want this done if they want to be relevant at all.

Most others are on the take and risk falling off the gravy train if they support going after the Epstein class.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

Because that's what their constituents want. That's how they have any power at all. Especially MTG. Tucker Carlson has lost all if his other support.

They both have to cater to the people who want this done if they want to be relevant at all.

Most others are on the take and risk falling off the gravy train if they support going after the Epstein class.

MTG doesn't have any constituents. They say what people want to hear for clout, money etc. How many times did MTG make sales with insider knowledge? I don't believe they actually care about many of the things a progressive candidate generally cares about.

I don't buy it.

 

[Phatguysrule]

MTG doesn't have any constituents. They say what people want to hear for clout, money etc. How many times did MTG make sales with insider knowledge? I don't believe they actually care about many of the things a progressive candidate generally cares about.

I don't buy it.

It doesn't matter if they care about a progressive agenda right now, IMO.

What matters is if they care enough about the Epstein class to be useful at building support for getting lobbyist and foreign money out of politics.

I think they are both desperate to stay relevant and Ro Khanna was able to take advantage of their tenuous position.

That's just how I see it.

 

[JfizzleBlazer]

I think they are both desperate to stay relevant and Ro Khanna was able to take advantage of their tenuous position.

Exactly why anyone should not trust them or do business with them. They have already proven to everyone who they are. It isn't a good look.

 

[crandc]

In one of his first acts, Hungary's new prime minister announced end to funding Conservative Political Action Committee. He said CPAC is welcome there but not at taxpayer expense.