Nikolokolus
There's always next year
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2008
- Messages
- 30,704
- Likes
- 6,198
- Points
- 113
http://blog.oregonlive.com/behindblazersbeat/2008/12/the_mcmillan_threat_who_was_th.html
Sounds like Nate is just as displeased with Roy burning up all of his energy on the offensive end and not giving enough on defense.
Anyway, interesting read that clarifies (and further muddies) some of what Quick wrote about in his article from Friday.
Is it time for Jerryd Bayless, I asked.
McMillan smiled, giving me the sense that he read what I wrote last night.
"I made the comment for us as a team: I'm looking at change,'' McMillan said. "If I don't see the change we need ... OK we've done some good things, but we are starting to make the same mistakes. We are not seeing our guys take the next step at certain spots. So, that's everybody. We need to take that next step. Defending better. Rebounding better. Attacking better. Not turning the ball over.
"So, yes, I'm looking at Sergio. Yes, I'm looking at Ike (Diogu). Yes, I'm looking at the small forward position. I'm looking at all of our guys, and there are guys who want opportunities. So is it time for Bayless? I'm certainly looking at what we are doing the last couple of games, and if it continues maybe another game or so, we make that move.
"My thing is I don't want to make that move (pause) I'm not flip-flopping,'' McMillan said. "That guy is going to get the same opportunity as the other guy. You don't rush it and you don't flip-flop it and play with guys' minds. We are already playing a lot of guys, and to play you one game ... that I don't want to do.''
"We were a decent, or OK defense team,'' McMillan said. "Now, we are worse. That can't happen. So I let them know that this is a problem. I thought our last game (against Dallas) was just bad. Really bad. Even though that's a good team, it was still bad. So this is where we are: We've had a rotation, but we are going to get guys in and give another guy a shot.''
I then asked, 'Who exactly are you talking about?'
"It could be Bayless. It could be Diogu. It could be bringing Joel back in (as a starter). It could be Travis or Rudy at the three,'' McMillan said. "It's just ... it's ... it's a sense of urgency. LaMarcus ... it could be all of our guys. Brandon ... in the sense of we are playing you too many minutes. Don't tempo yourself, thinking in your mind that you have to bring it tonight again, so you don't give it on the defensive end.''
By the way, that might have been the first time McMillan has ever pointed out a flaw of Roy ... noting that Roy has been exerting so much energy on the offensive end that his defense of late has suffered. I will like to see how Roy responds to that.
Sounds like Nate is just as displeased with Roy burning up all of his energy on the offensive end and not giving enough on defense.
Anyway, interesting read that clarifies (and further muddies) some of what Quick wrote about in his article from Friday.

