OT Four Potential Trade Packages for DeAndre Jordan

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

dviss1

Emcee Referee
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
29,691
Likes
27,680
Points
113
http://hoopshype.com/2018/01/23/four-potential-trade-packages-for-deandre-jordan/

Portland Trail Blazers

The New York Times’ Marc Stein surprised basketball aficionados with the following news on Jan. 22:



The report came as somewhat of a shock because the Portland Trail Blazers like to tout their Big Three of Damian Lillard, CJ McCollumand big man Jusuf Nurkic as their building blocks of the future.

It’s only right, as the trio did make a nice run late last season after the team acquired the Bosnian center from the Denver Nuggets.

This year, however, the same success has been hard to come by.

The Blazers boast a mediocre 104.5 offensive rating in 2017-18, the league’s No. 16 mark, and for a team with two scorching scorers like Lillard and McCollum on the roster, that’s simply unacceptable.

The dirty secret for Portland is that Nurkic has struggled mightily this season.

Although his play picked up a bit recently, the Blazers are actually 2.3 points per 100 possessions worse with their starting center on the floor.

Among 5s who attempt at least 10 shots nightly, Nurkic has the sixth-lowest field-goal percentage at 47.1 percent. Even more damning: Of the five centers who shoot a lower percentage, all of them attempt at least three triples per contest; Nurkic has taken seven all year long.

His blend of awkward flip shots near the rim and long 2-pointers have made him a greatly inefficient player in his fourth campaign, so it makes sense why Portland may quietly want help down low.

To acquire Jordan as Stein suggested, a package of Nurkic, Shabazz Napier and Evan Turner checks out financially.

The Blazers would be savvy to sell high on Napier, who finally, in his age-26 season, is starting to resemble the prospect who made LeBron tweet the following back in 2014:



But on top of those three players, since the Clippers would be doing Portland a major favor by taking Turner’s bloated contract off their hands, the Blazers are probably going to have to add their 2018 first-round pick to the pot as additional sweetener.

Would that big of a haul be worth it for Los Angeles’ behemoth?

It’s tough to tell, but at the very least, adding a veteran like Jordan, who’s so aware of his limitations and plays to his strengths so exquisitely, would give the Blazers’ offense a much-needed jolt of life. And he would only help bolster their seventh-ranked defense.

Meanwhile, in return, the Clippers would get an exciting, relatively young point guard, a serviceable wing, a starting-level center and a premium asset in the form of an unprotected first-round pick.

Final package: Evan Turner, Shabazz Napier, Jusuf Nurkic, 2018 first-round pick
 
Last edited:
There are some packages where I would consider him but this is not one of them. And the ones are probably not what would interest LAC.
 
Portland Trail Blazers
The New York Times’ Marc Stein surprised basketball aficionados with the following news on Jan. 22:



The report came as somewhat of a shock because the Portland Trail Blazers like to tout their Big Three of Damian Lillard, CJ McCollumand big man Jusuf Nurkic as their building blocks of the future.

It’s only right, as the trio did make a nice run late last season after the team acquired the Bosnian center from the Denver Nuggets.

This year, however, the same success has been hard to come by.

The Blazers boast a mediocre 104.5 offensive rating in 2017-18, the league’s No. 16 mark, and for a team with two scorching scorers like Lillard and McCollum on the roster, that’s simply unacceptable.

The dirty secret for Portland is that Nurkic has struggled mightily this season.

Although his play picked up a bit recently, the Blazers are actually 2.3 points per 100 possessions worse with their starting center on the floor.

Among 5s who attempt at least 10 shots nightly, Nurkic has the sixth-lowest field-goal percentage at 47.1 percent. Even more damning: Of the five centers who shoot a lower percentage, all of them attempt at least three triples per contest; Nurkic has taken seven all year long.

His blend of awkward flip shots near the rim and long 2-pointers have made him a greatly inefficient player in his fourth campaign, so it makes sense why Portland may quietly want help down low.

To acquire Jordan as Stein suggested, a package of Nurkic, Shabazz Napier and Evan Turner checks out financially.

The Blazers would be savvy to sell high on Napier, who finally, in his age-26 season, is starting to resemble the prospect who made LeBron tweet the following back in 2014:



But on top of those three players, since the Clippers would be doing Portland a major favor by taking Turner’s bloated contract off their hands, the Blazers are probably going to have to add their 2018 first-round pick to the pot as additional sweetener.

Would that big of a haul be worth it for Los Angeles’ behemoth?

It’s tough to tell, but at the very least, adding a veteran like Jordan, who’s so aware of his limitations and plays to his strengths so exquisitely, would give the Blazers’ offense a much-needed jolt of life. And he would only help bolster their seventh-ranked defense.

Meanwhile, in return, the Clippers would get an exciting, relatively young point guard, a serviceable wing, a starting-level center and a premium asset in the form of an unprotected first-round pick.

Final package: Evan Turner, Shabazz Napier, Jusuf Nurkic, 2018 first-round pick


Not no, but hell no
 
I only see one trade package
 
  • Like
Reactions: RR7
Yeah there is no way we can include our draft pick in any deal UNLESS we are able to keep Dame and CJ and Collins and receive a SF in return. In other words I am OK with moving Nurk, and our #1 (and any other filler to make it happen) for a very good wing, but not for a center. Because then we would still be in the same boat.

Last night when Aminu was trying to.....score, with 5 minutes to go, was a perfect reminder of why we need a 3rd scorer on this team.
 
I get that nurk has been frustrating, but that 3 for 1 makes us a worse team, IMO.
We currently have what, 4 players who can "reliably" create their own shot. Lillard, CJ, Napier and turner. This trade turns us, again, into a team with 2. Harkless has been awful, and he'd start by necessity.

Lillard
McCollum/ connaughton
Harkless
Aminu/ Collins/ vonleh
Jordan/ Davis.

Lillard and McCollum would run about 40ish minutes a night, because... who else?
No thanks
 
Davis and two 2nds to BOS for their 1st

CLE Gets: Aminu
LAC Gets: 2018 BOS, 2018 CLE, 2018 POR, 2020 POR, 2022 POR, Turner, Harkless, Leonard, Shunpert
UTA Gets: Napier, Vonleh
POR Gets: Griffin, Jordan, Hood (TPE), Burks (TPE)

:)
 
Rather keep and develop Nurk.
I wouldn't mind Jordan as a stopgap to further develop Nurk while giving Nurk something like 20min a game and DJ 28. Wed be better and if DeAndre left, we'd be fine with Nurk starting back into his C role.

But that's only if DJ comes dirt cheap.
 
I wouldn't mind Jordan as a stopgap to further develop Nurk while giving Nurk something like 20min a game and DJ 28. Wed be better and if DeAndre left, we'd be fine with Nurk starting back into his C role.

But that's only if DJ comes dirt cheap.
tenor.gif
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top