Bogus! Fuck ICE

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!


In Earnings Calls, Private Prison Executives Revel in Profiting Off ICE Arrests​


Eliza Dewey

9–12 minutes



During a second-quarter earnings call in August, an executive with the GEO Group ticked off a list of the private prison company’s accomplishments so far this year. These included securing contracts with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for expanded immigrant detention centers in New Jersey, Michigan, Georgia, and California; working to convert six facilities — most of them former prisons — into ICE detention sites; and making moves to cash in on detention operations at military sites.

“All of these efforts are aimed at placing our company in the best competitive position possible to pursue what we continue to believe are unprecedented growth opportunities,” George Zoley, the executive chair of the GEO Group board, told investors and other stakeholders attending the Aug. 6 call, according to audio and call transcripts from the online investment research website, Seeking Alpha.

Executives at CoreCivic, another major for-profit prison company, were equally upbeat in their earnings call that same month.

“Our business is perfectly aligned with the demands of this moment,” CEO Damon Hininger said on the Aug. 7 call. “We are in an unprecedented environment with rapid increases in federal detention populations nationwide and a continuing need for solutions we provide.”

In some sense, the cheerfulness was not surprising. The day after President Donald Trump was elected to his second term, shares for GEO Group and CoreCivic jumped by double digits. Trump had repeatedly promised mass deportations on the campaign trail, and private prison companies were in place to reap the rewards, based on their longstanding role under both parties in detaining immigrants.

The earnings calls from the nation’s two largest private prison companies offer details about how big players in that industry are championing and profiting from Trump’s mass deportation agenda. GEO Group reported a total second-quarter revenue of $636.2 million, while CoreCivic reported $538.2 million, up 9.8% from the second quarter of last year, with third-quarter reports expected in early November.

“What they’re doing is heinous; there’s no other way to describe profiting off of human suffering,” said Paolo Almiron, media coordinator for the advocacy group Resistencia en Acción New Jersey.

Neither Zoley and the GEO Group nor Hininger and CoreCivic responded to a detailed list of questions on the allegations in this story, including about whether they had ethical or moral concerns about their business. ICE also did not respond to Prism’s request for comment.

Industry Acknowledgment of the Federal Arrest Quota​

Multiple media outlets, as well as White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, reported earlier this year that the Trump administration set a quota of 3,000 ICE arrests per day. That number supercharged the immigration raids that spread across the country this summer, resulting in the increased targeting of immigrants without a criminal record.

In August, however, the Department of Justice denied that such a quota had ever existed.

But on the GEO Group earnings call this summer, these same quotas were described as common industry knowledge.

After Zoley described media reports that ICE wanted to increase its capacity to 100,000 beds by the end of this year, one participant on the call asked a follow-up question.

“Do you have a sense for the detention rate required to justify 100,000 detention beds?” he asked. “In other words, is it [that] 3,000 a day equals 100,000 beds?”

“It is that simple rule of thumb, as you described it,” Zoley responded, adding it was a model “that we’ve heard many times.”

“It was based on the objective of deporting a million people a year,” he said, clarifying that the quota was a “theoretical model” that would likely be affected by lawsuits.

No Mention of Poor Conditions​

Leaders in both calls discussed how much money their companies have made from facilities that have made headlines for allegations of widespread abuse.

Patrick Swindle, president and chief operating officer of CoreCivic, spoke about the company’s revival of the country’s largest immigration detention facility, located in Dilley, Texas.

“We are on schedule to complete full activation by the end of the third quarter, when we expect to generate the full fixed monthly revenue for the facility,” said Swindle, who did not respond to Prism’s request for comment.

The Dilley Immigration Processing Center, formally named the South Texas Family Residential Center, was first opened under former President Barack Obama in 2014, when it faced criticism from human rights advocates for detaining mothers and their children seeking asylum after crossing the border. It was closed last summer by former President Joe Biden’s administration, but Trump’s administration reopened it this spring.

Advocates who spoke with Prism described ongoing poor conditions at Dilley, including delayed medical care and the weaponization of “self-deportation” by federal agencies.

A mother and her child who were sent to Dilley in September after being swept up in an immigration sweep in a Chicago grocery store experienced this firsthand, according to immigrant advocacy group RAÍCES.

The woman had a severe ovarian cyst but was not given access to her normal medication while detained.

“She was at risk of bleeding out, and she was in significant pain throughout the course of her time at Dilley,” said Faisal Al-Juburi, RAÍCES’s chief external affairs officer.

The excruciating pain led her to agree on Oct. 10 to “self-deport,” a strategy that Trump has made a cornerstone of his second administration’s immigration crackdown.

Ten days later, the woman was still in detention without proper care for her cyst, according to Al-Juburi. He said ICE’s only response to repeated advocacy by his organization has been to confirm that she is being processed for removal.

Other media outlets have also covered complaints about delayed medical care at the Dilley facility, particularly for children, held for weeks or months without justification.

Meanwhile, those on the GEO Group earnings call spoke about the Delaney Hall detention center in New Jersey, which began holding immigrants in May. Zoley said the company’s contract at that site was “expected to generate in excess of $60 million in annualized revenues in the first full year of operations.”

The call did not include any mention of conditions at the center. Advocates told Prism about a range of ongoing concerns there.

“The spaces are extremely crowded, the food is in such bad state that people refuse to eat it, the water has a strange odor, and people are not given medical care until they are extremely sick,” said Almiron of Resistencia en Acción.

“Visiting schedules are irregular and are mostly spread through word of mouth,” Almiron added. “It’s only thanks to the work of local immigrant rights organizations that there’s at least an idea of when people can go and visit.”

Kathy O’Leary, New Jersey region coordinator for Catholic organization Pax Christi USA, stands watch outside Delaney Hall three to four times a week as part of a New Jersey coalition called Eyes on ICE.

“What we’re hearing is that people are going without food for 12 hours,” O’Leary said. “The food is coming frozen, moldy, otherwise spoiled, and in meager portions.”

Both advocates described a strict dress code that can keep visitors from seeing their loved ones. One woman traveled to Delaney Hall from Massachusetts to visit her family member, only to be told her jeans did not pass the dress code, O’Leary said. Eyes on ICE volunteers sitting outside the facility found a pair of pants for the woman to wear so that she could enter.

In June, detainees frustrated by inadequate food and overcrowding at the facility broke windows, doors, and security cameras while others made panicked phone calls to loved ones and attorneys outside the walls. Four men escaped through a weak exterior wall, and, ultimately, the facility was put on lockdown. The four men were re-arrested later.

Profiting Off Detention​

Despite increasing anti-ICE protests across the country and viral videos of increasingly aggressive ICE arrests across social media, the second-quarter earnings calls in the private prison industry were business as usual.

“Our financial performance, which has been pretty significant this year, only incorporates … a very small part of the opportunity that’s going to be, I think, near-term for us as we go to end of this year into 2026,” Hininger said.

The content of the calls isn’t necessarily shocking to immigrant advocates.

“At the end of the day, their priority is their bottom line for their shareholders,” Al-Juburi said. “This is what happens when we prioritize profits over people. Is it shocking? Yes. But is it surprising? No.”
 
President Biden had signed executive order prohibiting government agencies from placing spyware on phones. Trump overturned it. He authorized ICE to use spyware programs that are undetectable that provide full access to phones, remotely turn on microphone and camera without user being aware. They are authorized to use to track immigrants and "antifa", catch all term for anyone who opposes Trump.
 
President Biden had signed executive order prohibiting government agencies from placing spyware on phones. Trump overturned it. He authorized ICE to use spyware programs that are undetectable that provide full access to phones, remotely turn on microphone and camera without user being aware. They are authorized to use to track immigrants and "antifa", catch all term for anyone who opposes Trump.

Link please.
 

Had trouble finding article not behind paywall
 
Cuban immigrant, fanatic Trump supporter, is now in maximum security prison in Africa.

He backed Trump convinced that would get bad immigrants out. Good immigrants like him, who wore MAGA hat and displayed Trump flag and Trump sticker of course were safe.

He was picked up and declared guilty of heinous crimes. DHS said he is convicted murderer. Not true. He did nine years for attempted murder. Afterwards he cleaned up his act, worked as a plumber, married, gathered American children. Clean record for decades.

Face eating leopards weren't going to eat his face.
 

She makes some very good (and very obvious, already beat to death points) but I have a hard time believing that an overly made up, very young lady/influencer who is obviously podcasting from her mom's basement is going to sway a single MAGAt. This is the kind of stuff King Dong laughs his ass off at.....just sayin'.
 
She makes some very good (and very obvious, already beat to death points) but I have a hard time believing that an overly made up, very young lady/influencer who is obviously podcasting from her mom's basement is going to sway a single MAGAt. This is the kind of stuff King Dong laughs his ass off at.....just sayin'.
I agree on all accounts. But at this point I'm just hoping that apathy doesn't set in.

 
I agree on all accounts. But at this point I'm just hoping that apathy doesn't set in.


Well it is nice to see a young person taking this all seriously. So many of them have their heads down or have just plain given up. Right now it seems to be the Boomers leading the way, but then, that probably isn't fair. Just my take from participating in No Kings events. The youngsters are probably the ones in the inflatable costumes....
 
She makes some very good (and very obvious, already beat to death points) but I have a hard time believing that an overly made up, very young lady/influencer who is obviously podcasting from her mom's basement is going to sway a single MAGAt. This is the kind of stuff King Dong laughs his ass off at.....just sayin'.

She ought to at least know the difference between "prosecuted" vs. "persecuted" (as she said) to the full extent of the law.
 
Confirmed: ICE Is Arresting American Citizens—and Lying About It

A recent report from ProPublica documents the detentions of some 170 American citizens by Immigration and Customs Enforcement during its anti-immigration operations. But the implications of the report go considerably further, suggesting an agency completely out of control and flouting the Fourth Amendment at every turn.

The report is a harrowing demonstration of ICE overreach. It puts the lie to the declaration of the Department of Homeland Security spokesperson that “we don’t arrest U.S. citizens for immigration enforcement.” The facts on the ground tell a very different tale.

ProPublica’s report chronicled a series of ICE arrests that would be hard to believe if they weren’t backed by official complaints and eyewitnesses. In one, masked agents pointed a gun at, pepper-sprayed, and punched a young man whose only offense was filming them as they searched for his relative. In another, they tackled a 79-year-old car-wash owner, pressing their knees into his neck and back. The man, who had just undergone heart surgery, was left with broken ribs and was denied medical attention for 12 hours. In a third case, agents handcuffed a woman on her way to work and held her for more than two days—without any contact with the outside world.

All Americans, even those for whom immigrants are instinctively “other,” should be disgusted by these abominations, which make clear that there is no foolproof protection for anyone, Americans included, from ICE’s rabid tactics.

The report documents two categories of concern. As ProPublica notes, about 130 of the total number were arrested for allegedly assaulting officers. Many of these allegedly were overblown: ProPublica notes that they produced a “handful” of guilty pleas to misdemeanors. At least 50 of those cases were tossed, or charges were never filed.

So they give rise to questions about whether ICE is abusing its power to arrest law-abiding protesters, like the man who was pepper-sprayed for the “crime” of videoing agents. Protesters can be raucous, but raucousness is not a crime.

It is the other category of detained Americans, at least 50, that presents a graver indictment of ICE. Consider that nothing sets apart these relatively few American victims of ICE from the tens of thousands of people the agents scrutinize. Nor do the agents know their nationality when they confront them. So what we’re seeing in the ProPublica report is very likely ICE’s general M.O. And a series of lawsuits on behalf of noncitizens alleges exactly that.

When agents encounter strangers, the Fourth Amendment imposes three core limitations:

1. If, and only if, agents have particularized suspicion that a person may be guilty of a crime, they can stop the person (make a “Terry stop”) and pose a brief series of questions to dispel or confirm their suspicions. This is the basic dividing line that border czar Tom Homan and others in the administration say the agents are following in nearly every case.

2. If, and only if, agents have developed probable cause that a person is guilty of a crime, they can arrest them—restrain their physical movements. That includes, of course, Americans or anyone else who assaults law enforcement.

3. At all times, including during arrests, agents may not employ force that is unreasonable under the circumstances.

These three guideposts mark the difference between a democracy and a police state. And yet, in case after case, ICE agents are blowing through those guardrails.

The three Kafkaesque tales above all revolve around multiple constitutional violations. Lacking particularized suspicion of an immigration offense, the ICE agents were prohibited from even a brief detention. Their actions plainly constitute arrests without probable cause. And they proceeded to apply patently unreasonable force.

We’ve seen similar arrests and unreasonable force wherever ICE has operated. The abuses in the ProPublica report are only a small subset. It’s been a core reason that a series of courts—from Chicago to Portland to Los Angeles—have come down hard on the agency.

Judge Sara Ellis in Chicago found that ICE agents repeatedly violated reporters’ and activists’ Fourth Amendment rights. She refused the government’s request to limit relief to one immigration facility, concluding that the violations were widespread. “If I felt secure that this was only happening in Broadview,” Ellis said, “I’d be happy to limit it, but I don’t believe that is the case.”

Would that the Supreme Court shared her justifiably jaundiced view. In the court’s recent decision to permit agents to stop people based on their skin color, language, and the kind of work they were seeking, Justice Brett Kavanaugh parroted the administration’s line. He wrote, “If the officers learn that the individual they stopped is a U.S. citizen or otherwise lawfully in the United States, they promptly let the individual go.”

In fact, every week brings new videos of federal agents ignoring, detaining, tackling, and pepper-spraying their prey—deploying force in situations where even local police, bound by far stricter accountability, would hesitate to make an arrest. The pattern suggests not isolated mistakes but a systemic culture of impunity and contempt for constitutional safeguards. Watching Gregory Bovino, the head agent in charge of ICE’s Chicago operation, strut contemptuously into Judge Ellis’s courtroom like Colonel Jessup (Jack Nicholson) in A Few Good Men left little confidence that senior ICE officials are instilling in their agents any ethos of constitutional compliance.

It’s tempting to see these cases as tragic anomalies. They are not. They are the predictable consequence of a political project that conflates law enforcement with warfare and citizens with suspects. Each time a citizen is wrongly detained or beaten by federal agents, the injury extends beyond the individual: It erodes the shared understanding that government power must answer to the Constitution.

What the ProPublica investigation reveals is not simply a rogue agency but a government willing to tolerate—and at times encourage—lawlessness in its name. In community after community, ICE has created zones of fear where both citizens and noncitizens tread carefully, knowing that a routine errand or encounter could end in detention.

The same authoritarian reflex that animates the president’s contempt for judges and journalists is now operating in street-level enforcement, where ordinary Americans are discovering that their citizenship is no shield against state violence.

The lesson of abusive, unconstitutional treatment of American citizens is thus not limited to immigration. It is a warning about the corrosion of constitutional culture itself. A government that flouts the Fourth Amendment and then lies about it to courts and the people has already crossed a moral and legal frontier. The question is whether the country will fight back before the border between law and lawlessness disappears altogether.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top