Bogus! Fuck ICE (4 Viewers)

[SharpeScooterShooter]

Again, I asked about the first line of your statement at the time you made it.

I quoted that line.

I did not edit it.

I did not change it.

And dismissed everything else in the quote. I then answered you and you omitted that answer from your timeline.
I said i knew you would get me wrong and then i said of course they are wrong.
Its all in the posts…

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

Truncated?!? I stopped at your first line and asked for further clarification.

Yes. Truncated.





trun·cate
/ˈtrəNGˌkāt/
verb
gerund or present participle: truncating

1. 1.
   shorten the duration or extent of.

 

[Chris Craig]

You mistook me saying i don't care about what trump or ice is doing because its irrelevant to vandalism as me not caring what they are doing. And questioned my compassion about it. I asked you to please dont get me wrong. I thought i clarified i was talking about vandalism and not ice or trump. Because i hadn't previously commented in this thread, you questioned my compassion.

He didn't say you didn't care. He was saying you were focusing on the vandalism Instead of the bigger picture. A small crime vs the egregious abuses happening in our country. He's just saying it's not really worth the time to focus on the small things.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

You mistook me saying i don't care about what trump or ice is doing because its irrelevant to vandalism as me not caring what they are doing. And questioned my compassion about it. I asked you to please dont get me wrong. I thought i clarified i was talking about vandalism and not ice or trump. Because i hadn't previously commented in this thread, you questioned my compassion.

I asked you two questions. That's all I did.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Yes. Truncated.





trun·cate
/ˈtrəNGˌkāt/
verb
gerund or present participle: truncating

1. 1.
   shorten the duration or extent of.

I quoted the first line of your post because that was the part I was asking questions about.

 

[Strenuus]

Stren is neither an angel or evil to anyone here. Either are you. He's not allowed to say fuck you. Report it.

Lol when did I say fuck you to him? Im actually intrigued!

 

[Chris Craig]

Lol when did I say fuck you to him? Im actually intrigued!

Idk. I think he's saying you said it to other people maybe.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

And dismissed everything else in the quote. I then answered you and you omitted that answer from your timeline.
I said i knew you would get me wrong and then i said of course they are wrong.
Its all in the posts…

If you didn't want me to reply to that first line of your post, why did you post it?

 

[Strenuus]

Idk. I think he's saying you said it to other people maybe.

Oh got it.

Moving on. Lol.

 

[Chris Craig]

Oh got it.

Moving on. Lol.

Thank you

 

[Phatguysrule]

Fuck you

Fixed it for you

 

[crandc]

Boys.
An occupying army is terrorizing an American city. An American citizen was murdered and then slandered as a terrorist. Schools are in remote learning because students are afraid to go to school. A group of volunteers is buying food and other necessities for their neighbors who are afraid to leave home. A sick lady was pulled from her car, beaten and arrested trying to get to the doctor. A teen was abducted and beaten. Children as young as six months have been tear gassed.

This is not about you.

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

I asked you two questions. That's all I did.

It’s not what you asked, it’s how you asked.

“Are you that fucking stupid?”

“What is your IQ?”

Both are questions.

Sorry i ever tried agreeing with you on the vandalism post. I figured the intellect here could discuss one without muddying it with the other.

I suppose i should have created a vandalism thread.

It is possible for some people to focus on certain aspects without dismissing others. So sorry i focused on the vandalism. I had no clue it would create such pushback. I thought people would agree. I assumed people would be able to separate the two topics. Thats what I get for assuming.
Im sorry.

 

[ehizzy3]

I also agree, there are illegal immigrants here, and I'm fine with ICE arresting and deporting them, especially if they are violent criminals. I don't think most people here are against that.

There is a way to do that respectfully, within the law, and peacefully as possible. We agree that's not happening. Hiding behind masks, no identity, no accountability. Just a bunch of agents acting like Thugs, basically violenty kidnapping people off the streets, breaking into their cars and homes, going into schools, etc.

That is terror my friend.

Can we stop with the illegal immigrant. This is just another way to dehumanize immigrants and garner support for the way they are treating immigrants. In fact, being here without documentation is not even a punishable crime, it’s a civil violation.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

It’s not what you asked, it’s how you asked.

“Are you that fucking stupid?”

“What is your IQ?”

Both are questions.

Sorry i ever tried agreeing with you on the vandalism post. I figured the intellect here could discuss one without muddying it with the other.

I suppose i should have created a vandalism thread.

It is possible for some people to focus on certain aspects without dismissing others. So sorry i focused on the vandalism. I had no clue it would create such pushback. I thought people would agree. I assumed people would be able to separate the two topics. Thats what I get for assuming.
Im sorry.

Where did I ask you those questions?

You can't because I didn't.

I asked you two simple questions that were polite and not insulting. If you're taking those two questions to mean I'm calling you stupid or you have a low IQ, then the problem is you and not me.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

YES! LOVE THIS!

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

Where did I ask you those questions?

You can't because I didn't.

I asked you two simple questions that were polite and not insulting. If you're taking those two questions to mean I'm calling you stupid or you have a low IQ, then the problem is you and not me.

Where did i say you said that? You cant. Because i didnt.
It was an example of how a question can be asked in different ways.

“May i ask you what you think of how ice is operating?” Is polite.
“Have you seen the news about ive operations?” Is polite.

“You've seen nothing in the thread that makes you care about what ICE is doing and how this administration is using them?” Is insinuating I'm ignoring the meat of the thread and dont co ave any compassion.

“You've seen nothing in the news that makes you care about what ICE is doing and how this administration is using them?” Insinuating the same thing. Combine these questions with your dismissal of the point i was trying to make and, yes, it reads very much like you are judging me.

This is going nowhere. You are right and i am wrong………….

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

He projected, like he always does. He assumes, like he always does.

Anyway, back to much bigger problems.

People who say fuck a sect of voters and fuck them all, should be warned to not say such things… feel special you get special privileges.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Where did i say you said that? You cant. Because i didnt.
It was an example of how a question can be asked in different ways.

“May i ask you what you think of how ice is operating?” Is polite.
“Have you seen the news about ive operations?” Is polite.

“You've seen nothing in the thread that makes you care about what ICE is doing and how this administration is using them?” Is insinuating I'm ignoring the meat of the thread.

“You've seen nothing in the news that makes you care about what ICE is doing and how this administration is using them?” Insinuating the same thing. Combine these questions with your dismissal of the point i was trying to make and, yes, it reads very much like you are judging me.

I asked you those questions because you can not remove the reason behind the vandalism. Which is what you did by saying you don't care about ICE and Trump.

It's important to have the context.

I posted a link to the Boston Tea Party. That was stone-cold vandalism. If you look at the act alone without context, it could even be considered terrorism.

The BTP was bad because it hurt the innocent people who sell the tea, and the taxpayers are going to have to make up for the loss of taxation to the King.

Yes, I asked you those questions because you're trying to talk about the act without talking about the reason behind it.

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

He didn't say you didn't care. He was saying you were focusing on the vandalism Instead of the bigger picture. A small crime vs the egregious abuses happening in our country. He's just saying it's not really worth the time to focus on the small things.

I didn't say he said i didn't care. I said he questioned my compassion.
He posted the vandalism and said that shits gotta stop. I simply added another reason why.

 

[SharpeScooterShooter]

I asked you those questions because you can not remove the reason behind the vandalism. Which is what you did by saying you don't care about ICE and Trump.

It's important to have the context.

I posted a link to the Boston Tea Party. That was stone-cold vandalism. If you look at the act alone without context, it could even be considered terrorism.

The BTP was bad because it hurt the innocent people who sell the tea, and the taxpayers are going to have to make up for the loss of taxation to the King.

Yes, I asked you those questions because you're trying to talk about the act without talking about the reason behind it.

I thought i made it clear i was talking about vandalism in any form. Not the specific vandalism you posted.
Yes, one can discuss vandalism without doscussing ice or trump. Vandalism happens outside of trump aNd ice influences.
I was speaking on vandalism as a whole. Thats why i said i dont care about ice or tump. I was trying to make a statement about all vandalism regardless of motive. Thats why i said i dont care about ice or trump. In the context of vandalism as a whole i felt it was irrelevant.
That is all.
Just one big missindersranding that i thought i could comment/ discuss vandalism as a separate entity.
I was wrong.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

This is very very good.

Did she hit him? @barelyinfo does a breakdown of how we can see she did not.​

 

[Chris Craig]

I didn't say he said i didn't care. I said he questioned my compassion.
He posted the vandalism and said that shits gotta stop. I simply added another reason why.

But, he didn't. He said he didn't see you posting about Ice and then asked what your thoughts were on what's been going on.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

I was speaking on vandalism as a whole. Thats why i said i dont care about ice or tump. I was trying to make a statement about all vandalism regardless of motive. Thats why i said i dont care about ice or trump. In the context of vandalism as a whole i felt it was irrelevant.

And that's fine. I didn't press you further on it. You're the one who has taken issue with how I responded. I only asked questions because I felt I did not have enough information to give you an answer.

 

[Phatguysrule]

Not sure I like the use of see you next Tuesday... But...

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[SlyPokerDog]

 

[Shaboid]

Was that getup designed by Hugo Boss?

 

[BigGameDamian]

 

[SlyPokerDog]