BlazerCaravan
Hug a Bigot... to Death
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2008
- Messages
- 28,071
- Likes
- 10,384
- Points
- 113
I don't Believe so. ISIS has taken full responsibility.
To be fair the Saudi government couldn't take responsibility for 9/11 since they're allies.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I don't Believe so. ISIS has taken full responsibility.
It's not my fucking job to answer your questions.
To be fair the Saudi government couldn't take responsibility for 9/11 since they're allies.

Wow... Not sure why you have such hostility right now.
It was a simple logical question. You seem to want to believe what the government has told us with regard to jet fuel but can't explain why you believe that when WTC building 7 didn't have a drop of jet fuel touch it and wasn't it by any plane. I was simply questioning why.
So then if it was Saudi Arabia, who are our allies, that doesn't equate it being an inside job?![]()
It's not my fucking job to answer your questions.
Evading the question implies guilt. Where were you?
How did this turn into a 9/11 thread?
Yeah... I'm just simply asking you questions. Thats it thats all. They are logical questions. No ones treating you like an enemy. Not sure why you're getting so defensive about logical questions...
Some ref is trying to goad me into a technical.
Look I want to believe it was an inside job as much as the next guy, but I just don't think it's viable.
It's not my fucking job to answer your questions.
I HAVENT BEEN GIVEN A CHANCE TO GIVE YOU MY POSITION IN FULL.
I think the Bush Administattion let 9/11 happen. I think they were in on it to jack the economy with that sweet sweet defense spending. I just don't also think they detonated the buildings.
It started because you said earlier that people who believe jet fuel did not cause the towers to fall we're "insane". I'll admit, I take offense to that.
I hope everyone puts me in ignore.
It started because you said earlier that people who believe jet fuel did not cause the towers to fall we're "insane". I'll admit, I take offense to that.
Note that structural steel at 550 degrees C (1022 F) has 60% of the strength of steel at normal temperatures.
It doesn't need to melt to fail structurally.
Now why would we go and do a thing like that?
Real talk: Is Paris an inside job?
Behold the power of quotation marks!I missed this game but the game thread has morphed into some really entertaining reading...I thank you all..
Behold the power of quotation marks!
Probably so. However, molten steel was found so that just destroys that argument.
Yes, we've all seen those pictures. There were bronze, copper, iron, and other metals used in the construction or decoration of the WTC complex, all of those metals have a much lower melting temperatures. You see something melting in a picture and immediately assume it's steel.
So you think that engineers analyze metal by just looking at pictures of it. I guess that proves they are wrong.
Lame.So you believe that the government crashed planes into the buildings and then secret government bad guys were able to run into the buildings and put secret sauces on the metal beams that cuased them to melt where the planes hit and then run out of the buildings without being seen and before the fire department got there.
Yes, I'm sure that's exactly how it happened.
