Game Thread Game #16 - BLAZERS VS BULLS - NOVEMBER 17, 2021 - WEDNESDAY - 7:00 PM (PDT) ROOT SPORTS

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Who should start?

  • Lillard, CJ, Powell, Roco, Nurkic

    Votes: 4 14.3%
  • Lillard, CJ, Powell, Nance, Nurkic

    Votes: 5 17.9%
  • Lillard, CJ, Little, Nance, Nurkic

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lillard, Powell, Little, Nance, Nurkic

    Votes: 17 60.7%
  • Other ( Please Specify)

    Votes: 2 7.1%

  • Total voters
    28

Chris Craig

(Blazersland) I'm Your Huckleberry, Beardo
Staff member
Global Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jun 25, 2015
Messages
62,047
Likes
62,544
Points
113
2019-bulls-hero.jpg

______________________________________

STARTERS

244706606_536943597402488_9206600258910414322_n (1).jpg

225572844_521567082470889_8190114532599493403_n.jpg

______________________________________

WHEN: NOVEMBER 17, 2021 - WEDNESDAY - 7:00 PM (PDT)

WHERE: MODA CENTER, PORTLAND, OR

New_Court.0.jpg

TV BROADCAST

Root_sports_logo-removebg-preview.png

RADIO BROADCAST

iFl5dde.png

____________________________

BENCHES

BLAZERS


203469-removebg-preview.png 1626204-removebg-preview.png

Cody Zeller Larry Nance Jr
1629642-removebg-preview.png 1629014-removebg-preview.png
Nassir Little Anfernee Simons
203503-removebg-preview.png 1628372-removebg-preview.png
Tony Snell Dennis Smith Jr
203463-removebg-preview.png 1629604-removebg-preview.png
Ben McLemore CJ Elleby
1630535-removebg-preview.png 1630570-removebg-preview.png
Greg Brown Trendon Watford
1629833-removebg-preview.png
Keljin Blevins

BULLS

1627936.png 1628396.png

Alex Caruso Tony Bradley
1628972.png 1629076.png
Troy Brown Jr Tyler Cook
1630245.png 1629653.png
Ayo Dosunmu Devon Dotson
1629750.png 1628993.png
Javonte Green Alize Johnson
1627884.png 1630250.png
Derrick Jones Jr Marko Simonovic
1629744.png 1629632.png
Matt Thomas Coby White

_______________________________________

INJURIES

BULLS


Patrick Williams (Wrist) OUT

Nikola Vucevic (Covid) OUT

BLAZERS

Damian Lillard (Abdomen) Probable

__________________________________

COACHES

131117_lakers_v_pistons_137-removebg-preview.png

Chauncey Billups

https___specials-images.forbesimg.com_imageserve_5f6e27514b2877a0b10c7bf3_0x0-removebg-preview.png
Billy Donovan

_________________________________

NOTES

PAST 5


BULLS


CHI 100 - LAC 90 W
CHI 93 - GSW 119 L
CHI 117 - DAL 107 W
CHI 118 - BRK 95 W
CHI 105 - PHI 114 L

BLAZERS

POR - TOR
POR 95 - DEN 124 L
POR 104 - HOU 92 W
POR 109 - PHX 119 L
POR 109 - LAC 117 L

  • This is the first of two meetings between the Bulls and Blazers. The two teams will meet again January 30th in Chicago.
  • The Trail Blazers and Bulls split the 2021-22 season series 1-1
  • Derrick Jones Jr played for the Blazers during the 2020-21 season
  • Tony Snell was drafted by the Bulls in the 2013 draft, with the 20th pick. He was a Bull from 2013-16

__________________________________


TRIVIA

The Blazers and Bulls last played on January 30th. The Blazers won 123 -122. He recorded 18pts in a start for the Blazers.

__________________________________

71xcqp8-4aL._AC_SX569_-removebg-preview.png





 
I’ll be going to this game with my son.

I’m looking forward to seeing if they can bring the same energy as they did with Toronto. Portland can look amazing in spurts, and down right ugly immediately afterwards.

Lets keep that energy level and intensity high and get that second win in a row!
 
Bulls look good. I'm still not a fan of that DeRozan deal, but I like everything else Chicago did this past offseason and even DeRozan is unquestionably helpful, if overpaid.
 


We got rid of Melo and Kanter horrific defense yet are hardly better in defensive rank thus far.

Doesn't seem like the change in schemes is giving us better results.

Its still early in the season, so I'm hopeful this could improve. The defense has looked great at times. Then other times horrible, giving up way more open threes or dunks than last year.
 
We got rid of Melo and Kanter horrific defense yet are hardly better in defensive rank thus far.

Doesn't seem like the change in schemes is giving us better results.

Its still early in the season, so I'm hopeful this could improve. The defense has looked great at times. Then other times horrible, giving up way more open threes or dunks than last year.
A lot of the problems come from breakdowns at the point of attack.... It starts a chain reactions that is hard to recover from.
The other major problem is that we are almost always playing a smaller lineup compared to the other team. It's tough when you are always giving up size.
 
We got rid of Melo and Kanter horrific defense yet are hardly better in defensive rank thus far.

Doesn't seem like the change in schemes is giving us better results.

Its still early in the season, so I'm hopeful this could improve. The defense has looked great at times. Then other times horrible, giving up way more open threes or dunks than last year.

idk what conclusions you can draw when this team is a top 10 defense at home (and they’ve played some really good teams too) and a bottom 10 one on the road. Seems like a team still finding their way. I’m a lot more optimistic about this team under Billups than I ever was under Stotts. The flashes are louder. The inconsistency isn’t surprising, it’s a completely new system to everyone. It was always going to take time. If we could give Stotts a decade I think we could give Billups at least half a season before judging.
 
Far from an expert, but could it be that all of the constant double teaming is just giving too many wide open 3s? Is there a team that gives up more uncontested 3s, no defender even close, than Portland? Switching and going around picks are harder avoid, but how many times have we seen a Blazer running over, jumping with a hand raised to try and, unsuccessfully, stop a 3 from draining in.
Are offenses FORCING the Blazers to constantly double? Or is doubling Chauncey's attempt to compensate for a defensively weak roster i.e. help defense? I would guess the latter.
 
We got rid of Melo and Kanter horrific defense yet are hardly better in defensive rank thus far.

Doesn't seem like the change in schemes is giving us better results.

Its still early in the season, so I'm hopeful this could improve. The defense has looked great at times. Then other times horrible, giving up way more open threes or dunks than last year.

The fact that it's even great at times should give hope, honestly. Cause we may have had it once in 30 or 40 games with stotts, whereas in 15 games we have had elongated stretches of good to great defense. Yes, we fucking suck at times too but when you're learning all new schemes and coverages thats going to happen. Especially with a bunch of players who don't know much better given the coach they had previously. (Dame, CJ, et al.)
 
We got rid of Melo and Kanter horrific defense yet are hardly better in defensive rank thus far.

Doesn't seem like the change in schemes is giving us better results.

Its still early in the season, so I'm hopeful this could improve. The defense has looked great at times. Then other times horrible, giving up way more open threes or dunks than last year.
 
Far from an expert, but could it be that all of the constant double teaming is just giving too many wide open 3s? Is there a team that gives up more uncontested 3s, no defender even close, than Portland? Switching and going around picks are harder avoid, but how many times have we seen a Blazer running over, jumping with a hand raised to try and, unsuccessfully, stop a 3 from draining in.
Are offenses FORCING the Blazers to constantly double? Or is doubling Chauncey's attempt to compensate for a defensively weak roster i.e. help defense? I would guess the latter.
I'm not an expert either but I don't think Billups is calling for double teams. They happen when one of the other teams' guards gets past our defender and is headed straight for the basket. One guy is still chasing him and another slides over to cut him off from the basket, and so they both end up on him. Probably the guy who gets beat should look to peel off and look for someone else to defend as soon as he sees his guy is cut off? Although he may be so deep by then that it's best to keep two guys on him.
 
Last edited:
They happen when one of the other teams' guards gets past our defender and is headed straight for the basket. One guy is still chasing him and another slides over to cut him off from the basket, and so they both end up on him.

I've seen that very scenario. I figured it's just bad communication.
 
pretty easy to see that Portland isn't as bad as their road record; and they aren't as good as their home record

the game against Chicago will even their road/home balance and it might even their record at .500

Right now, they have a massive 18-7 home/road schedule over the next 25 games. If you count last night, that imbalance was 19-7. I can't recall the Blazers ever having that long a stretch of basketball and having a +12 game home game edge.

Blazers need to take advantage of having a 25-15 home/road edge over their first 40 games because it completely flips in their last 42 games. I think Portland needs to be at least 10 games over .500 at 40 games or they will be facing the real possibility of the play-in
 
So it's just plain bad defense, especially on the perimeter.

mostly. They are 28th in opponent 3ptFG%. Last season, with a historically bad defense, they ranked 20th in opponent 3ptFG%. Their rotations to 3 point shooters has been really bad. I think a significant part of that is length. I think length closes gaps faster that speed and Portland has very little length on the perimeter. Besides that while they are small, they aren't really that fast
 
A lot of the problems come from breakdowns at the point of attack.... It starts a chain reactions that is hard to recover from.
The other major problem is that we are almost always playing a smaller lineup compared to the other team. It's tough when you are always giving up size.

This is what I've been saying for a few years. There is no scheme that can make up for below average point of attack defenders on the outside.
 
Not that Quick enjoys rubbing our collective noses in the teams' short-comings.

To be fair, he was really trying to sell us the Billups was going to bring that "it" factor that Stotts didnt' have. I think he did/does really want things with Billups to be successful and Quick was saying last year he thought this was a top 4 roster in the West.
 
I don't think we are as good as our home record shows. Last night first game that CJ and Dame had good shooting night hopefully it's continues. But last night the bench had a good game that got us back in the game in the first half. Starters have to be energized at the start but lately they haven't been.
 
To be fair, he was really trying to sell us the Billups was going to bring that "it" factor that Stotts didnt' have. I think he did/does really want things with Billups to be successful and Quick was saying last year he thought this was a top 4 roster in the West.

Quick also thought Meyers Leonard had all-star potential
 
Quick also thought Meyers Leonard had all-star potential
Quick once wrote a huge story about Telfair being the player that was going to change the culture for the Blazers. Even proclaimed he would be the face of the franchise for many years.
Jason Quick is rarely correct.
 
Quick once wrote a huge story about Telfair being the player that was going to change the culture for the Blazers. Even proclaimed he would be the face of the franchise for many years.
Jason Quick is rarely correct.

He's been a decent writer at the Athletic, but his player evaluations suck
 
Quick is a puppet for Olshey. I remember this off-season Quick kept repeating that they should keep the starting lineup in tact because for a 20 game stretch to end the season, the analytics said it was the best starting lineup in the NBA.

Blah blah blah

We’re too undersized 1-3 to be a contender. If it wasn’t for Olshey’s love affair with CJ we would’ve upgraded our size and versatility years ago.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top