GAME 2 - RANGERS-KINGS

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Jones was like he was trying to get around mac..he could have gone to the right but instead choose to cut to his left....in the crease ...and make contact with hank...even milbury thought it was interference. If we dont score in OT..this non call will be the talk of this series.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
You think that would be the talk of the series through two games more than the slew of TO's that we have had in our own zone leading to almost every King goal so far?

Sure we complain about the interference there, and it should have been called, but what about the fact that if we cleared the puck like we should have it never happens and we don't even leave it on the ref to make or not make the call. That is the issue here in my humble opinion.
 
Watching the 2 idiots milbury and jones trying to defend the non-goalie interference call on hank as a good call. Christ they suck and should just put their kings jerseys on. I am totally pissed right now. Till big mac gets up here hank better learn how to use his stick to clear out the d by himself. Those slashes to the back of legs with the goalie sticks hurt
 
You think that would be the talk of the series through two games more than the slew of TO's that we have had in our own zone leading to almost every King goal so far?

Sure we complain about the interference there, and it should have been called, but what about the fact that if we cleared the puck like we should have it never happens and we don't even leave it on the ref to make or not make the call. That is the issue here in my humble opinion.

I agree with you 100% on this, but it's easier to blame the refs....
 
Rangers are a resilient team maybe not the Kings but they have to find a way to get a goal in OT


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
You think that would be the talk of the series through two games more than the slew of TO's that we have had in our own zone leading to almost every King goal so far?

Sure we complain about the interference there, and it should have been called, but what about the fact that if we cleared the puck like we should have it never happens and we don't even leave it on the ref to make or not make the call. That is the issue here in my humble opinion.

Yes...that change the entire momentum of the game. No bullshit goal...then thr gabby goal isnt as bad. Plus we go on the PP

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
kings have been outplayed for most of game, a few mistakes does not make this a tie game, ref incompetence has!
 
If this team didn't have it's collective head up their collective ass with the turnovers, we could have gone to NY up 2-0.
 
kings have been outplayed for most of game, a few mistakes does not make this a tie game, ref incompetence has!

except it does. What counts is what's on the scoreboard not what you feel should be.
 
It was a horrendous call. It should have been a penalty. At the very least the goal should have been waved off.

Game is about momentum swings and that goal changed the game. I try not to complain about the refs a lot but that goal had an enormous impact on the game and Hank


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Fair enough. We'll agree to disagree Al. If we don't turn the puck over it never happens. If we don't turn the puck over the Gabby goal never happens. If we don't turn the puck over the 1st goal in game 1 doesn't happen. If we don't turn the puck over the OT goal in game 1 never happens. I see a theme here.

That is what I would be focusing on, but to each their own.

With that said WIN THIS GAME IN OT AND WE ARE WHERE WE NEED TO BE.
 
We've blown 2 different 2-gl leads this game. Heck, with that type of incompetence defensively we DESERVE to lose.
 
3 different two goal leads. 2-0, 3-1, 4-2 AND that is after we blew a 2-0 lead in game 1.

What else do we need to say.
 
OVERALL the rangers played a great game, they had a few blips which every team has, the rangers all year have been on the wrong side of BAD calls, NOTHING NEW HERE!
 
3 different two goal leads. 2-0, 3-1, 4-2 AND that is after we blew a 2-0 lead in game 1.

What else do we need to say.

you're right. Makes it even worse, lol....but the whiners gonna whine about the refs...
 
Twice a fucking pick by the damn linesman

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
another penalty missed on moore..... this is a recording
 
good. i want the refs to put the whistle away and let the boys play.
 
Calling whinning all you want but when two of the three national announcers said it should NOT be a goal. Then what..we should all CLap our hands and say beautiful goal. Bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
TRIPPED UP AGAIN, and if its not tripping it must be embellishemnt right? so which is it?????lol
 
When your 4th line has been the best these first two games...not good

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
Calling whinning all you want but when two of the three national announcers said it should NOT be a goal. Then what..we should all CLap our hands and say beautiful goal. Bullshit.

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk

yes, it's whining. Like Chuck already said twice, if we clear the zone the play never even happens. If we clear the zone Gabby doesn't tie the game. So yes, you're just whining.
 
Ill stick with the paid announcers, thanks

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 
i'm trying to figure out who is the player Emrick keeps referring to as "Chipotle"
 
It was a horrendous call. It should have been a penalty. At the very least the goal should have been waved off.

Game is about momentum swings and that goal changed the game. I try not to complain about the refs a lot but that goal had an enormous impact on the game and Hank


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dont ever question the official!

Sent from my SM-G900P using Tapatalk
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top