Game 2!

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

THE HCP

NorthEastPortland'sFinest
Joined
Sep 16, 2008
Messages
73,052
Likes
62,283
Points
113
They say the team that adapts or makes the best adjustments win in the playoffs. PHX did it to us last year after game 1. What do we need to do to win game 2? In my opinion you know they are going to bring a strong double team now on LA in the post and let us try to beat them from downtown. Do we keep leaving Kidd and hope the law of averages catch up?
 
They say the team that adapts or makes the best adjustments win in the playoffs. PHX did it to us last year after game 1. What do we need to do to win game 2? In my opinion you know they are going to bring a strong double team now on LA in the post and let us try to beat them from downtown. Do we keep leaving Kidd and hope the law of averages catch up?

Get new refs who will call fouls on both ends. It's as simple as that.
 
They will absolutely force us to beat them from the outside. We have to shoot much better from three. Also, it will be crucial for Wallace and Matthews to get going early and often.

I think we will play off Kidd at the start and make him force us to do otherwise.
 
We do exactly what we did last game. Get the ball to Aldridge. Get the ball to Miller and Batum when Terry and Barea are in the game. Post them up over and over until Carlyle has to take them out of the game. Play the same level of defense we did on them when we held them to 14 in the third quarter. Kidd won't score 24 again. We'll win by 5-10 points. If Wallace and Matthews show up and we hit our three point shot, we'll blow them out by 20. I'm not worried about Game 2 at all.
 
Obviously I think we need to get more from Wes....... on both ends!
 
We do exactly what we did last game. Get the ball to Aldridge. Get the ball to Miller and Batum when Terry and Barea are in the game. Post them up over and over until Carlyle has to take them out of the game. Play the same level of defense we did on them when we held them to 14 in the third quarter. Kidd won't score 24 again. We'll win by 5-10 points. If Wallace and Matthews show up and we hit our three point shot, we'll blow them out by 20. I'm not worried about Game 2 at all.

This. Well said Speed.
 
Came in here to drop off my 2 cents, and found that everyone else had already paid up, with interest. Steady as she goes -- there's no way Kidd keeps shooting 60% from 3, and we've got to trust that if Portland stays aggressive, the calls will come. We just have to convince the scriptwriters that we'd actually make the more dramatic 2nd round team...

:devilwink:
 
Just had a chat with Billy Bano in the lobby. He said the game plan went just like they wanted it to, with one exception....... we didn't hit any 3's! He said they are going with the same game plan as game 1!

The Blazers are historically streaky at shooting threes. If that's any part of their gameplan, they are in trouble.
 
The Blazers are historically streaky at shooting threes. If that's any part of their gameplan, they are in trouble.

Streaky we may be, but we will not win this series without hitting more of our open threes. On the flip side, if Dallas keeps nailing this many contested threes, we are also doomed.
 
Streaky we may be, but we will not win this series without hitting more of our open threes. On the flip side, if Dallas keeps nailing this many contested threes, we are also doomed.

Two things really concerned me going into the playoffs, our bench production/back up PG and outside shooting. Both reared their ugly head in the first game. The other thing that surprised me was playing Brandon so much at the end of the game and actually running plays for him.
 
Just had a chat with Billy Bayno in the lobby. He said the game plan went just like they wanted it to, with one exception....... we didn't hit any 3's! He said they are going with the same game plan as game 1!

I'm pretty sure we didn't bank on Kidd hitting six threes either. As an aside, you should probably check with the staff before you post stuff like this, as cool as it is to read it.
 
As an aside, you should probably check with the staff before you post stuff like this, as cool as it is to read it.

Agreed in principle, but do you think Bayno would be chatting about it in the lobby with HCP (whatever THAT stands for...) if it were considered top secret game-planning?
 
Last edited:
I get that Kidd is a 34% 3pt shooter this year, but the 3 years prior he was over 40%. It's not out of the question for him to go on a hot streak when the Blazers give him wide open looks. I get playing off of him, but don't just forget about him, either. It's not out of the question for Kidd to knock down wide open 3pt shots. And when I say wide open, I mean WIDE OPEN. The Blazers played him as if he were Andre Miller.
 
I get that Kidd is a 34% 3pt shooter this year, but the 3 years prior he was over 40%. It's not out of the question for him to go on a hot streak when the Blazers give him wide open looks. I get playing off of him, but don't just forget about him, either. It's not out of the question for Kidd to knock down wide open 3pt shots. And when I say wide open, I mean WIDE OPEN. The Blazers played him as if he were Andre Miller.

Did you see that last three near the end of the game? As a Blazer fan, I'll invite him to take that kind of contested, out-of-rhythm shot ANY day. Yes, he did have some open looks, and yes, he is good enough to go on a few streaks, but the key about that statement is that all streaks end. He's a decent outside shooter, but he's not 60% good, whether or not he has a defender in his grill.
 
Good point Max, you never know huh?
 
Did you see that last three near the end of the game? As a Blazer fan, I'll invite him to take that kind of contested, out-of-rhythm shot ANY day. Yes, he did have some open looks, and yes, he is good enough to go on a few streaks, but the key about that statement is that all streaks end. He's a decent outside shooter, but he's not 60% good, whether or not he has a defender in his grill.

Kidd was definitely on fire last night and that kind of performance won't be the norm.

That said, it's not out of the question for Kidd to hit at a 40% clip in this series if the Blazers give him those kind of looks all series. The Blazers can't play him like he's Andre Miller. Kidd averaged 5.2 attempts/G in Feb from 3 and he averaged 47% from 3 that month. A very poor final two months really took away from his overall % for the year.

I'm not convinced Kidd can't hit at a 40% rate if the Blazers keep playing him the same way. It's playoff time so the old guy is fired up after a long season and is ready to knock down wide open shots - as he did last night. Playing him like he's Andre Miller could be costly, imo.
 
Last edited:
Did you see that last three near the end of the game? As a Blazer fan, I'll invite him to take that kind of contested, out-of-rhythm shot ANY day. Yes, he did have some open looks, and yes, he is good enough to go on a few streaks, but the key about that statement is that all streaks end. He's a decent outside shooter, but he's not 60% good, whether or not he has a defender in his grill.

You give a guy a bunch of opportunities to get into rhythm and he is much more likely to hit those.
 
Kidd was definitely on fire last night and that kind of performance won't be the norm.

That said, it's not out of the question for Kidd to hit at a 40% clip in this series if the Blazers give him those kind of looks all series. The Blazers can't play him like he's Andre Miller. Kidd averaged 5.2 attempts/G in Feb from 3 and he averaged 47% from 3 that month. A very poor final two months really took away from his overall % for they ear.


I'm not convinced Kidd can't hit at a 40% rate if the Blazers keep playing him the same way. It's playoff time so the old guy is fired up after a long season and is ready to knock down wide open shots - as he did last night. Playing him like he's Andre Miller could be costly, imo.

Agreed, and I'll accept 40% from him -- removing 2 of those threes would have completely changed the final couple minutes of last night's match. Game 1 aside, I don't think Kidd has enough in the tank to be the man in this series, and I'd really like to see him shoot more. My hunch is that he actually is what we thought he was, and we're going to see something much closer to his seasonal 36% overall shooting from here on out.
 
Send free throw guy to dallas (he is asking for sponsorship haha)

X
 
You give a guy a bunch of opportunities to get into rhythm and he is much more likely to hit those.

"Momentum" in sports is actually vastly overrated -- this isn't NBA Jam. ;)

He had a good shooting night -- these things happen. If you flip a coin 1000 times you are statistically almost guaranteed to have multiple streaks of 10, 15, or more heads or tails in a row at some point along the way. Eventually, though, it always comes back to 50%.
 
I get that Kidd is a 34% 3pt shooter this year, but the 3 years prior he was over 40%.
Exactly my concern. At this stage of his career, Kidd is a 3-pt specialist and a very respectable outside shooter. He wants that shot and our game plan was to dare him to take it??? Even worse, we were surprised that he kept making open looks? I just don't get the thinking. Make Stevenson, Marion, or Chandler take the open shots, not a future Hall of Famer with tons of playoff experience.
 
Exactly my concern. At this stage of his career, Kidd is a 3-pt specialist and a very respectable outside shooter. He wants that shot and our game plan was to dare him to take it??? Even worse, we were surprised that he kept making open looks? I just don't get the thinking. Make Stevenson, Marion, or Chandler take the open shots, not a future Hall of Famer with tons of playoff experience.

Your "3-pt specialist" shot 27% from behind the arc during the March and April regular season, averaging about 1.3 per game. In Dallas' 4 games against us he averaged 29%, hitting about 1.4 threes per game. Let him shoot.
 
Here are my tips:
  • There will be a new ref crew.
  • Nate needs to keep refs honest. Stay in their ear. Get a T if need be. If things are really going awry, get ejected. Coach ejected due to slimy calls gets more news.
  • We need to put some hard, intentional, fouls on Nowitzki. Make him scared of the interior.
  • Find out what defensive plays lead to Rudy or Miller being on Dirk. Neutralize these plays so only LaMarcus, Batum or Camby are on Dirk.
  • Get a bigger game from 2 of the following 3 players: Wallace, Matthews or Roy
  • Only leave Roy in if he is producing.
 
Your "3-pt specialist" shot 27% from behind the arc during the March and April regular season, averaging about 1.3 per game. In Dallas' 4 games against us he averaged 29%, hitting about 1.4 threes per game. Let him shoot.
So, you're going to value a recent cold stretch above what he's done the past 3-4 years? I'm betting on the clutch vet every time.
 
So, you're going to value a recent cold stretch above what he's done the past 3-4 years? I'm betting on the clutch vet every time.

Really? If you're betting on the clutch vet to significantly (and consistently) exceed his career 32% postseason rate, you are probably going to lose your money. But don't let me (or the numbers) convince you otherwise... ;)
 
Really? If you're betting on the clutch vet to significantly (and consistently) exceed his career 32% postseason rate, you are probably going to lose your money.
He's never been left that wide open that consistently...

But don't let me (or the numbers) convince you otherwise... ;)
Uh, what? The only relevant numbers are him shredding us in game 1 because we dared him to shoot. You're the one unconvinced by the numbers.
 
So, you're going to value a recent cold stretch above what he's done the past 3-4 years?

Uh, what? The only relevant numbers are him shredding us in game 1 because we dared him to shoot. You're the one unconvinced by the numbers.

So, you're going to value a recent (and brief) hot stretch above what he's done the past 16 years? Can't have it both ways -- do you go with the one game outlier or everything else?

P.S. Just to clarify, I'm not saying that we should leave ANYONE wide open if we can help it, including Kidd. He had some good looks, but he also nailed some shots that he should not have. It happens sometimes. Just don't try to paint him as some kind of deadeye that's going to torch us every game if we don't double him outside the arc, all because of a single outburst. He has a WORSE career 3P% than Nic, and yet in that game he hit 6 threes and Batum got 1 on mostly equally open shots. It happens. Let it go and move on.
 
Last edited:
So, you're going to value a recent (and brief) hot stretch above what he's done the past 16 years? Can't have it both ways -- do you go with the one game outlier or everything else?
That's ridiculous. I said his game 1 production was a result of him being intentionally left wide open. That has nothing to do with recent averages. He got hot because we practically begged him to shoot the only shot on the floor he wants to take these days.

Just don't try to paint him as some kind of deadeye that's going to torch us every game if we don't double him outside the arc, all because of a single outburst. He has a WORSE career 3P% than Nic, and yet in that game he hit 6 threes and Batum got 1 on mostly equally open shots. It happens. Let it go and move on.
1) Who said anything about doubling him? That's a pretty poor comprehension of the topic.

2) 40% 3-pt shooters are not a dime a dozen. Combined with tons of playoff experience, I'd say that qualifies him as as much of a deadeye as anyone in the series.

3) His career percentage is totally irrelevant, as he was a terrible 3-pt shooter the bulk of his career. He totally transformed that part of his game when his athleticism declined.

4) "Let it go" is a failure to acknowledge a faulty game plan and "moving on" means going home early...
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top