My two cents ... maybe three cents with inflation ...
* This was one of those games where statistics really were misleading. Nurk finished with good numbers, but I thought he only brought it in spurts. For the most part, he seemed unmotivated and Gobert was his dad. It's very hard to win when Nurk isn't locked in for his 28 minutes.
* Ant shot the ball well, but I thought the game really turned on an easy play that he didn't convert in the first quarter when he boned the layup when the Jazz backed off on his baseline drive. We were rolling and had momentum, but the Jazz come down and hit a 3. Then C.J. comes down and wastes a possession trying for a style-point buck and the Jazz come down and hit another 3, and our nice early lead was gone. I think the Jazz thought Ant was going to flush it, but Ant seemed to be expecting a shotblocker there. Thing is, he has a clear path. He has to go hard and TRY to throw it down. He has these incredible hops but they're wasted on him. He plays like he thinks he's Steph Curry or Lou Williams.
* CJ, CJ, CJ ... smh. It's not that he is selfish and takes bad shots for me so much as WHEN he tries to play hero ball. I could feel that stretch after the Ant miss was a potential momentum-changer. We missed a bunny. They hit a 3. After that, I want to work the clock a bit and get a quality shot or get fouled. I don't want the opponent getting on a roll. Coming down in that situation and just running false offense is poor game sense. It's a lack of awareness. I think these are bad habits from all the years of Terry Stotts, who just let this stuff slide. Breaking him and Dame of that mentality probably isn't doable at this point, at least not to a great degree.
* A lot of people are going to probably think the Jazz's ball movement is what got them running downhill offensively. I think it actually was before that. It's our guards inability to keep the opponents' guards from driving into the paint to initiate thing. When that happens, someone has to help and then the defense has to scramble, recover and close out. That's often going to end up resulting in open 3s for any team that moves the ball quickly. When our guards were able to contest the initial penetrator on their own, Utah's offense completely broke down. It's not our guards' lack of height that's an issue as much as their on-and-off commitment to stopping the dribble.
* Almost all the teams we're competing with to get into the playoffs in the West are deeper than us. That's not misfortune. We blame Stotts or we blame Olshey. In reality, both created that situation. First, Stotts aversion to playing young players and his failure to develop those he did play. Then, the Blazers end up overspending assets on role players like RoCo. A guy picked just outside the lottery can be a rotation player, but it doesn't help you if you're trading away those picks. Both moves are attempts to tread water in the standings. Eventually, you run out of stamina and start to sink.
* Our supporting cast has to be able to do one thing on offense: Make open shots. Look at teams like the Jazz. Their non-stars at least make open shots. Our guys aren't nearly that sure to knock down an open 3 if Dame drives, draws and kicks, and that lets teams just swarm him and CJ with defenders. TBF, CJ and to a lesser extent Dame don't really set up their teammates particularly well on the drive. A lot of Dame's assists are on PnR. When those guys get a seam to the hoop, they're looking to score, not to create an even better shot for someone else.