The Blazers are kind of a Frankenstein monster. It's like the roster was constructed with very little consideration put into how it all would fit together. I know they brought in RoCo and DJJ to improve the defense and offset some of the shortcomings on that end of the floor because Dame and CJ are so offensive-oriented, but it just doesn't seem like anything was done in terms of really figuring out "OK, this is what we like to do, this is what we need, let's construct a roster where those ideas and those player's strengths coalesce."
It was more like "we need a guy who plays defense, let's get him, we need a guy who can rebound, let's get him, we need a guy to fill out the roster, let's get him."
Was Giles signed because we felt he could help as a backup big or just because our front office thought we had to fill a quota of bigs? Because it's apparent he has no role on this team. No matter how well he played in the preseason, no matter how our depth on the front line was depleted, a way couldn't be made to fit him into our rotation and try to play to his strengths while covering up his shortcomings. It's like Stotts' system is so inflexible that there's really no adjustment that can be made to incorporate someone who is athletic and has some usable skills like Giles.
Or Norman? Norman came over from Toronto and appeared to be a significant upgrade over Trent. Instead, it looks like that trade on the floor was a push, with both players playing similarly in their new homes to the players they replaced. That's a loss for the Blazers, though, because they gave up the younger player who wasn't even starting for a guy who could just leave after half a season in Portland. But our offense or our personnel or whatever combination of the two doesn't share the ball enough to make Powell the kind of threat that really justified his acquisition, IMO. We got a really good player and we have no idea how to fit him in because we run this old-style isolation offense.