KingSpeed
Veteran
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2008
- Messages
- 63,334
- Likes
- 22,512
- Points
- 113
How about the time we won IN Boston, by the way?Maybe you have some dirt on those rose colored glasses that managed to lineup right in front of every Celtic shooter.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about the time we won IN Boston, by the way?Maybe you have some dirt on those rose colored glasses that managed to lineup right in front of every Celtic shooter.
We have the all star break soon so..I want Dame to sit a few games.
If he's injured, he needs to rest.
If he's dogging it, all the more reason.
Either way, if he's not carrying the offense, he's actually a liability out there with the way he's playing defense.
Even when dame was playing elite level, we were still losing games early in the season. It's most definitely everybody else not named dame orhow long has it been since Dame was the best player on the floor?
You wanna know why we keep losing? Look no further
And they've won a few that way too, and every team wins some and loses some on tossup games. The record lines up pretty damn close to what it should be based on points differential.Olshey? Yeah he is. We lost a bunch of games on last possessions.
how long has it been since Dame was the best player on the floor?
You wanna know why we keep losing? Look no further
I mean, if you want to ignore the continuous bad defense and pick out a game where we gave up over 120 as a good thing then go ahead.How about the time we won IN Boston, by the way?
LOL.We've only trailed after 3 quarters 11 times?? That's what I take from that stat. That means most of the time we lead after three!
You're ignoring all the times we play good defense. Like tonight!I mean, if you want to ignore the continuous bad defense and pick out a game where we gave up over 120 as a good thing then go ahead.
They just said 1-10 on TNT. Your stat makes more sense.LOL.
Were 4-23 when trailing after 3 quarters.
We've only trailed after 3 quarters 11 times?? That's what I take from that stat. That means most of the time we lead after three! Sounds like the 4th quarter is a big problem.
TNT just said the record is 1-10.Huh? I'm confused... I just posted a stat that we're 4-23 when trailing after 3.
How is that 11 times?
Sorry 54 games is a lot bigger sample size than 1 game.You're ignoring all the times we play good defense. Like tonight!
You're delusional if you really think we lead after 3 in 80% of our games.They just said 1-10 on TNT. Your stat makes more sense.
TNT just said the record is 1-10.
Maybe.Maybe they meant at home?
Dude. It wasn't me. It was TNT. I was saying it didn't make sense.Sorry 54 games is a lot bigger sample size than 1 game.
You're delusional if you really think we lead after 3 in 80% of our games.
It's 1-10 at home.
We've only trailed after 3 quarters 11 times?? That's what I take from that stat. That means most of the time we lead after three! Sounds like the 4th quarter is a big problem.
They just said 1-10 on TNT. Your stat makes more sense.
No you weren't..Dude. It wasn't me. It was TNT. I was saying it didn't make sense.
