Game Thread GAME# 74: CLIPPERS@ BLAZERS - APRIL 1, 2015 - WEDNESDAY, 7:00 PM (PST), KGW & NBATV

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Who do you want Portland's 1st Round opponent to be?


  • Total voters
    16
  • Poll closed .
I'm certainly not advocating getting rid of Stotts, but just like players need to improve, so do coaches. That loss was so deflating because of its importance and our inability to close the deal was maddening. In the bigger picture, only 1 team in the conference has had a clearly superior season than us, so hope for postseason success remains even while I stew over last night's debacle for 48 hours.
 
Agreed on all points. Towards the end of the 3rd quarter Stotts sat all of the starters. 11 pt lead was down to 4 when Dame checked in with about 9 min left in the game. By the time LA checked back in at around 7:00 min mark it was a 1 pt game. What did he think a lineup of Blake, Wright, Freeland, CJ, Kaman was going to do? He assumed since offense came so easy earlier in the game & with Clips on 2nd end of B to B that the starters would be able to restore order if (or when) the bench blew the lead. But too much momentum had been built. He finally panicked & called a t/o just to get LA back in the game when the lead was cut to one. The damage was done and Clips smelled blood in the water. Of course we need to make sure our top guys get enough rest, but when and how you do it are critical. I don't like his sub patterns. Not to mention his defensive philosophy. We are completely fine with giving up uncontested mid range jumpers, & lately we've been giving open 3s also. We never pressure or force t/o's, which is a big reason we don't score many fast break points. He doesn't even acknowledge the defensive failures. Last night he said "I suppose our defense could have been a little better, but you have to credit the Clippers for making shots". He always says that. Yeah Terry, WIDE OPEN shots. Only time I heard him voice displeasure with defense was after loss in ORL a few weeks ago. Other than that it's scary how he sees the game and that his strategy is hopefully our opponents miss all of the open midrange shots we willingly offer up.
While the game wasn't of the same magnitude, the 4th quarter of last night's game kinda felt like Game 1 of the 91 WCF ... Solid lead, four bench players in, by the time starters returned momentum had swing firmly in the visitor's camp.

Also, I keep wondering why we don't look to force more turnovers. They lead to fast break points and when we are clicking, really clicking, it's because we're getting easy looks on the break.

Lastly, I'm getting sick and tired of Stotts' spiel about the other team "just making jump shots." You hit it right on the head, they were WIDE FUCKING OPEN. And it's not like we were banking on Udonis Haslem or Brandon Bass - good, not great shooters - to cool off. It was Blake Griffin and in case Stotts doesn't know, that jumper is money in the bank all night if he's left alone. I guess what frustrates me the most is we didn't even try to do anything different on defense. How is that acceptable?
 
And it's not like we were banking on Udonis Haslem or Brandon Bass - good, not great shooters - to cool off.
First person to correctly guess what my response to this would be gets...um...a congratulations from Capt. Obvious?
 
Also, I keep wondering why we don't look to force more turnovers. They lead to fast break points and when we are clicking, really clicking, it's because we're getting easy looks on the break.

Then again, judging by how poorly we run some of our fast breaks, maybe that's not a good thing to have more of them.
 
Shows we need to do it more.

We're pretty good at the weave. Maybe we should do the weave during our fast breaks, high school basketball practice style!
 
Shows we need to do it more.

We're pretty good at the weave. Maybe we should do the weave during our fast breaks, high school basketball practice style!
Lolololol I'd laugh so hard if we did that. We could call it the Buddy - Ted - Luke three man weave.
 
As an aside: The official score keeper shorted Batum a rebound in the first quarter. He had 4, but only got credit for 3.

And how about that bullshit second foul on Afflalo? RedDick bodied into him, then continued to drive into him like he was a blocking dummy at football practice, and Arron go the foul and had to sit. Also, I watched the last two Clippers games and both games the "screener" routinely sets a moving pick then turns into a downfield blocker and moves the defender five feet out of the way giving the ball handler a clear path to the basket. It's pure bullshit and I can't believe it doesn't get called. Lillard got absolutely creamed on that play in the fourth quarter.

On a positive note: Right from the first possession the Blazers did a great job solving the high Damian double problem.

:cheers:
 
I just don't feel that negative at this point. Batum finding his old productive self is huge. Afflalo is playing with more confidence and being integrated into the offense. Kaman is playing with more passion and hitting shots again. Damon is going to the basket more and also seems to be looking for assists more. Freeland is back. So there are a lot of positives. Defense seems to be the problem. Hopefully the problem has been that Stotts has been trying to keep the defense simple until Afflalo learns it. I am hoping her realizes that his defense is very stagnant and predictable and teams are attacking it's weaknesses. Hopefully he is learning that you have to change things up sometimes, especially when the other team has a hot hand player or when they keep doing the same play over and over. I think we will see in the next half dozen games if this team has the stuff or not. I am still hopeful.
 
. . . Kaman is playing with more passion and hitting shots again. Damon is going to the basket more and also seems to be looking for assists more . . .

Don't suppose you work for ESPN by any chance?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top